First let me say that I loved the first movie and will absolutely see Part II!!! But, does anyone else find it hypocritical that the cast got up in arms and "revolted" at the casting of Mel Gibson as the crazy tattoo artist and his subsequent removal from the roll and them giving it to Liam Neeson? First, Mike Tyson, a convicted rapist who is known to be unstable and violent was in the first movie and is reprising his roll as himself in the second one. Second, Bill Clinton, a known philanderer who was also accused (and probably guilty of many crimes during his political career) is making an appearance in the sequel. Has Mel lost it a bit? Sure! But I find it strange that the cast, in a morally ambiguous movie to say the least, would so strongly object to one person but have no problem with two others!! Anyone else find this ridiculous?