What do we think about this then?


Last Updated:

  1. gadgetmann

    gadgetmann Active Member This Topic's Starter

    Joined:
    May 19, 2010
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    3

    Advertisement
  2. 8Ball

    8Ball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2010
    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    11
    Iphone appeared slightly quicker, but the Desire looked like the pages were rendered better for the screen.
     
  3. furious duck

    furious duck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    159
    Likes Received:
    10
    You've got to love the conclusion at the end of that scientific test. ;)
     
  4. brykins

    brykins Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    647
    Likes Received:
    77
    I can't believe that a half second difference in opening a web page will (a) ever be noticed by anyone or (b) really sway people to one device or the other. Pretty pointless test if you ask me. But what do we expect from the "Gadget Inspectors"?
     
  5. gie62001

    gie62001 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    Messages:
    269
    Likes Received:
    25
    hmmm the test they did is misserable :) hehe look at the content of pages the phones had to render only text and nothing else. why didn't they load pages full of flash content or images or other scripts that are heavy on loading?
    another thing the resolution of the desire is much greater so it has to render more pixels.
    and how do we know if it was connected to even the same wifi router?
    very unprofessional test. but you can see more tests on youtube which shows better tests :)
    i think either Apple paid poor Telegraph or gave free iphones to these two guys to run this test :)
     
  6. gie62001

    gie62001 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    Messages:
    269
    Likes Received:
    25
    yep the conclusion is just ridiculous :) hehe but very pleasant for iphone fanboys
     
  7. kingvortex

    kingvortex Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    30
    LOL @ the guy calling it an 'HT Desire' before the test starts. Get it right if you want to be taken seriously!
    This 'test' is a joke anyway. How many other apps are running on the Desire when they perform it? There could be a few, slowing it down by the milliseconds that the iPhone wins by. As we know, the iPhone does not multitask, so nothing else CAN be running in the background ;).
    Also, it is stated that the exact same app cannot be loaded on each device for testing. How about, just off the top of my head, Shazam??
     
  8. jason-567

    jason-567 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2010
    Messages:
    225
    Likes Received:
    27
    Whatever that test says, im never going back to a iphone
     
  9. JasonC

    JasonC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2010
    Messages:
    317
    Likes Received:
    38
    Worst test ever, where do they get these people?! and I bet they get paid s*** loads.
     
  10. gadgetmann

    gadgetmann Active Member This Topic's Starter

    Joined:
    May 19, 2010
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    3
    Yeah I must admit that the conclusion they drew was hardly based on a thorough test of all the features!

    It's like saying I am today testing a Ferrari and a Ford Galaxy. Look I can put more petrol in a Galaxy therefore its the better car.
     
  11. gie62001

    gie62001 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    Messages:
    269
    Likes Received:
    25
    :):D hehe
     

Share This Page

Loading...