Yeah 1024 Mhz is what your stock tu runs at max. I run mine at 1.4 Ghz max 0.2 Mhz min with a few other profiles for over 30 celcius, when phone is not used etc...
I basically set mine using smith058's guidelines.
Quote:
Originally Posted by smith058
plugged in set to 1.9/1.3 (high/low) - unplugged set to 1.4/0.2 - screen off 0.4/0.1...
I tried 2 Ghz for a benchmark but it was not stable for me and your battery should be kept under 30 degrees celcius anyway.
Last edited by Loota; March 10th, 2012 at 05:11 PM.
The Following User Says Thank You to Loota For This Useful Post:
Device(s): TOYNBEE IDEA
RESURRECT DEAD
ON PLANET JUPITER.
Carrier: Not Provided
Thanks: 35
Thanked 36 Times in 29 Posts
Yep I set to 1.5 max an 245 min ondemand on my main profile seems pretty snappy an temps running a lil above room temp so I geuss thats allright seems stable
How high has this phone been run safely
i keep my phone on 1.4 always..and lows at between 368 and 460 mhz...on interactivex
i usally never go above 1.4 because im not trying to shorten the life of my phone..and if i do go above 1.4 its usally just to test and benchmark..never usally that long
i found that if i go below 368 on the low side..the phone can be a lil laggy after waking up..
whatever you want bro...just keep in mind that running the cpu at high speed for extended periods of time can deffinetly put some wear on it...just because we can safely overclock to 1.9 doesnt mean its a good idea to run it like that all the time...so the best way to figure out what suites your phone best is by testing out different numbers and governers..untill you have met your needs
Processor speed is measured in Hertz
(same principal)
1024 kHz = 1 MHz
1024 MHz = 1 GHz
so 1.5 GHz measured in MHz would be.... 1512 MHz
and 1.25 GHz would be 1256 MHz
hope this explains it for you
__________________
If someone helps you or if you are using someone's Mods, ROMs, Scripts, etc. Always hit the thanks button --------------------------> Donations are Appreciated
Last edited by mavrikmeercat; March 11th, 2012 at 06:46 AM.
noob question, and ive waited to see if someone else asked it first. But what exactly does the wifi fix do? Im not exactly a fan of fixing (unless thats to tweak to make better) something that already works. I hate to sound insulting but could someone please possibly explain before I jump?
noob question, and ive waited to see if someone else asked it first. But what exactly does the wifi fix do? Im not exactly a fan of fixing (unless thats to tweak to make better) something that already works. I hate to sound insulting but could someone please possibly explain before I jump?
The wifi fix is not really a fix...it replaces your current wifi module with a new one that works with the new kernel.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BobZhome For This Useful Post:
So if I flashed this kernel, without applying the new module, the wifi would not work? Or would certain things not work? Does it change the ability or lack of ability to tether? Sorry for so many questions.
So if I flashed this kernel, without applying the new module, the wifi would not work? Or would certain things not work? Does it change the ability or lack of ability to tether? Sorry for so many questions.
Your wifi will not work, if you just upgrade the kernel. The old wifi module does not know how to properly communicate to the new kernel.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BobZhome For This Useful Post:
I wanted to comment that I have been using this kernel on my Ultra without the wifi module zip on OP flashed to it and I have been using my Ultra tethered to my Intercept over wifi with no problems. It's using the stock wifi module and it works fine. Did I miss reading something?......it works like this fine for me.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to bads3ctor For This Useful Post:
Device(s): TOYNBEE IDEA
RESURRECT DEAD
ON PLANET JUPITER.
Carrier: Not Provided
Thanks: 35
Thanked 36 Times in 29 Posts
me to i did notice i do have some occasional disconnect problems fixed with a reboot but there rare. an dont even know if it has to do with the kernel anyway . so i was wondering the same.thing
posted by tap talk
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to h20 For This Useful Post:
I wanted to comment that I have been using this kernel on my Ultra without the wifi module zip on OP flashed to it and I have been using my Ultra tethered to my Intercept over wifi with no problems. It's using the stock wifi module and it works fine. Did I miss reading something?......it works like this fine for me.
same here...every time i redo my phone i usally install the wifi fix for the hell of it, recently tried without it and have had no problems so far..
Thanks again for your work BZ
If it is possible. I want to use latencytop to test a TS bug theory.
# ./latencytop
Could not open /proc/sys/kernel/latencytop: No such file or directory
Could not open /proc/sys/kernel/latencytop: No such file or directory It will fix that ^^^^
I'm following instructions for installing new kernel. cwm says "restore complete" but when I check settings I says kernel 26357 and rom manager still only has noop or cfq as options for I/o scheduler.
I'm following instructions for installing new kernel. cwm says "restore complete" but when I check settings I says kernel 26357 and rom manager still only has noop or cfq as options for I/o scheduler.
Thanks for the feedback.... I'll look at it tonight when I get home.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BobZhome For This Useful Post:
Sorry about asking for something else to be added to your kernel but making it compatible with CM7 would help. It would need BOOTCLASSPATH changed, the netd fix for CM7, and a rmt_storage fix in the initramfs. Penguinrepair already has these fixes in his kernel but adding them to your kernel would help debug the rotation bug we have in CM7.
You can rip out the initramfs from penguinrepair's kernel and look at the changes.
Edit: BTW...the kernel is not the source of the touchscreen bug. CM7 for the TU does not have the touchscreen bug using a stock kernel and a modified initramfs. Something in the GB stock install is causing the TS bug...my guess is that CIQ is causing latency in the TS data stream.
__________________
Repping Android Creative Syndicate fo' life
Rooted The Samsung Galaxy Prevail and The Transform Ultra, and more boost phones to come!
Did you try the wifi fix? Judging by the description for the wifi fix I believe it will work for this new kernel too... see op
Just wanted to confirm the wifi fix does NOT work with the new kernel. I think that's what Bads3ctor was saying, but I don't fully understand "dev-lish" so I thought I would post in layman's terms.
i keep my phone on 1.4 always..and lows at between 368 and 460 mhz...on interactivex
i usally never go above 1.4 because im not trying to shorten the life of my phone..and if i do go above 1.4 its usally just to test and benchmark..never usally that long
i found that if i go below 368 on the low side..the phone can be a lil laggy after waking up..
Try using SmartassV2 I find that there's no lag when waking and it manages the processors clock more intelligently than interactive when the screen is off.
The Following User Says Thank You to grifta For This Useful Post:
6Likes
so I thought I would post in layman's terms. 
