• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Root Fast Evo with 2.2 and custom kernel

EarlyMon

The PearlyMon
Jun 10, 2010
57,583
70,387
New Mexico, USA
They tell me this will change again when the Droid X and Samsung Galaxy get 2.2 - I wouldn't know.

Until then, here's our moment in the sun.

Made this using the Quadrant benchmark, free from the Market, using a the stock rooted 2.2 rom and the netarchy-toastmod 3.7.6c kernel with the 30 fps cap lifted. No over-clocking, no hair-on-fire super tweaks, no killing every process to tweak the benchmark - just downloaded and run, the number on the bar says 1165.

EVO-Froyo-fast.png

The Nexus One 2.2 at the top uses the exact same processor (aside from the radio-control circuit) as our EVO. I attribute its higher score to the fact that it's sleeker and not running Sense. I happen to like Sense so I don't care.

Enjoy.
 
That's a little odd because I've gotten over 1300 with the leaked 2.2 from HTC. I figured our scores would be much higher with the FPS lifted.

I wonder what's biased mine? No telling what I have running - I've got some 60+ user apps added on to stock.

Over 1300 though? Cool!

Guess if I get time, I'll restore from backup and see what's different.

PS - I just read that the AAC+ codecs were broken in 2.2 and one of the kernel mods noted for the google kernel to fix that degraded the Quadrant scores.

No idea if that made its way into this kernel, though.
 
Upvote 0
I personally like sense also, but am going to try sense free once...just so I know :)

I didn't use quadrant, but according to linpack my phone went from a 1965 cray to a 1969 cray in 6 weeks. Gotta love progress.

:lma0: Yeah, I know, right? And where's the bench? :more lma0:

In other news - the Droid X forum has a 3 page thread with everyone there shooting it out with Quadrant. I noticed at least one report of exceeding 1300.

Now. I am patiently waiting for then to get 2.2 and see if they get the near doubling again in capability - as the original benchmarking brou ha ha suggested - or if they'll get just some incremental improvement per my claim that there were some shenanigans as to how they were getting 2.2 performance out of a supposedly all 2.1 phone.

I'm especially interested in that. :D

I also noted that the Quadrant reported the Snapdragon had frame buffering where the OMAP3 did not.

I will be more than happy to eat crow if I was wrong - but - until then, I'm going to keep my eye them.

That looks like this:

0~]
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones