Realistically, this comparison still does no justice. Who is going to use navigation to find their way around a building? Doing that in the bathroom shows that the G2 has faster GPS in the BATHROOM. Which is great if I wanted to navigate somewhere while I'm taking a shit...
A REAL GPS comparison should be done outside, in the open, with the GPS program itself as it was intended to, not something you downloaded off the market. You brought the G2 into a place where you knew it was going to perform better. The general public isnt going to take their phone into a bathroom and use their GPS. However, they will do it outside when they want use the actual navigation program.
When I'm in my car or standing outside somewhere the GPS on my Vibrant flies! I dont need a benchmark test to show me that its not quite as fast as the G2, I think I'll take the real-world experience. Not to mention each person is going to have a different experience with the GPS, it's all about location.
Its cool that you compared them, but I don't think it showed much... Do it outside somewhere and post those results. If the G2 is still fast than so be it, but I think the majority of people need more convincing than a market program GPS test in your bathroom. Use the actual GPS program that we would use if we were to navigate somewhere. There's numerous thread posts out there now that have determined that benchmarks are becoming less and less important. They were great a couple years ago when the phone technology wasnt so advanced, but now they don't mean much, unfortunately.
So in a nutshell, I say scrap the program you just used, take both phones outside in an uncontrolled environment, open the navigation programs and look up a destination. I think that will serve FAR more justice than the video posted above.
Not trying to be a jerk, but I hope I'm not the only one that thinks this was a bad comparison. Just saying...
