• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Not going to lie..camera is so-so.

Yaken

Member
Feb 8, 2011
88
8
Saw the pictures in the reviews and they looked great. And in decent lighting they are, but in low lighting they really look very poor. I take a lot of close up pictures in my office, and the lighting in there isn't the best. My iPhone produced better images. But, still loving the phone.
 
As long as I can get a decently clear picture I think I personally won't have an issue with it. It sucks for those who's phones are their only cameras though. Eventually we'll get a glass / sensor quality that will be outstanding in phones, putting up a rivalry to P&S Cameras. Great for those days I don't have my Canon DSLR with me.
 
Upvote 0
As long as I can get a decently clear picture I think I personally won't have an issue with it. It sucks for those who's phones are their only cameras though. Eventually we'll get a glass / sensor quality that will be outstanding in phones, putting up a rivalry to P&S Cameras. Great for those days I don't have my Canon DSLR with me.

I agree here for the occasional phone pic its all good, for those who use as a dedicated camera maybe not
 
Upvote 0
Being a professional photographer, I am a bit biased of course lol. I had amazing picture quality with my BlackBerry Tour. Now this is not to say that ALL BB's took great pictures because it depended on the MP AND if it had zoom/auto focus etc.. So that was just with THAT particular phone. However the iPhone 4 takes amazing pictures.
I think if it were my ONLY camera, I would be very dissatisfied.

BUT, because its just a nice "feature" on an amazing smartphone, the fact that I have my Canon Rebel XS dSLR camera on me at all time no matter where I go... this wont be a problem.
 
Upvote 0
Being a professional photographer, I am a bit biased of course lol. I had amazing picture quality with my BlackBerry Tour. Now this is not to say that ALL BB's took great pictures because it depended on the MP AND if it had zoom/auto focus etc.. So that was just with THAT particular phone. However the iPhone 4 takes amazing pictures.
I think if it were my ONLY camera, I would be very dissatisfied.

BUT, because its just a nice "feature" on an amazing smartphone, the fact that I have my Canon Rebel XS dSLR camera on me at all time no matter where I go... this wont be a problem.


Wish I could carry my Rebel with me everywhere I go, but with the weather, poor glass would suffer from the extreme temperature changes because I don't have anywhere at work I can really store it.
 
Upvote 0
Honestly I can't say its any worse than the issues I had with the iPhone 4 camera. If you look at Apple forums there are at least 4-5 threads full of complaints about that camera. In low light any small lens camera is going to suffer as even with a dual flash it will struggle to let in enough light, its the nature of the beast unfortunately.

Outside or with enough light this camera beats the iPhone 4's camera hands down, for a phone camera its quite good imo.

Just remember florescent lights will create a green cast in most photos, that is not a issue with the camera but rather its color balance since those lights naturally give off a greenish cast. I haven't tested if this camera has that issue like the iPhone 4 does thought.
 
Upvote 0
I am having some really good results with the camera in normal light and even in splotchy light. Its in really dark lighting that the camera fails but honestly that is to be expected. I thought my captivate took great pictures but this one blows that out of the water.....dont even get my started on the dell streaks camera....anyone remember some of those crappy pictures i posted? hahaha
 
Upvote 0
I am having some really good results with the camera in normal light and even in splotchy light. Its in really dark lighting that the camera fails but honestly that is to be expected. I thought my captivate took great pictures but this one blows that out of the water.....dont even get my started on the dell streaks camera....anyone remember some of those crappy pictures i posted? hahaha


I have been having good results...although I haven't used it dark lighting
Just took a pic in the dark and it looks real good no yellowing at all
 
Upvote 0
I also am a DSLR shooter... but you can't compare the little flake of a sensor vs that of even the APSC slr sensors... it's just not fair... that being said... in my little bit of playing the color is just the very bad auto white balance settings...

example... I just took these in my dark living room (sittin gon the couch, only a lamp on in the other room and outside.

defaults out of the camera including auto ISO EXIF data says ISO: 2081
IMAG0001.jpg


2nd shot, only changed the ISO setting to ISO: 800
IMAG0002.jpg


3rd shot, still set to ISO: 800 and changed white balance to florescent
IMAG0003.jpg


4th shot, changed back to auto ISO but white balance set to florecent exif states ISO: 2081
IMAG0006.jpg



sorry i'm on the netbook or else i'd work on some 100% crops for noise... but I think the big issue is white balance... even high end DSLRs have issues with WB (just the nature of the beast as it's guessing what color things are based off of what it thinks "neutral" is.

I took some shots today while out with my fam and was pleased with how they came out (purely as a remember the moment/fun type stuff and thats what I see this camera being for... so if they could work on auto WB i think it's a winner... (or just post process it I believe even picassa has some sort of WB adjustment
 
Upvote 0
I also am a DSLR shooter... but you can't compare the little flake of a sensor vs that of even the APSC slr sensors... it's just not fair... that being said... in my little bit of playing the color is just the very bad auto white balance settings...

example... I just took these in my dark living room (sittin gon the couch, only a lamp on in the other room and outside.

defaults out of the camera including auto ISO EXIF data says ISO: 2081
IMAG0001.jpg


2nd shot, only changed the ISO setting to ISO: 800
IMAG0002.jpg


3rd shot, still set to ISO: 800 and changed white balance to florescent
IMAG0003.jpg


4th shot, changed back to auto ISO but white balance set to florecent exif states ISO: 2081
IMAG0006.jpg



sorry i'm on the netbook or else i'd work on some 100% crops for noise... but I think the big issue is white balance... even high end DSLRs have issues with WB (just the nature of the beast as it's guessing what color things are based off of what it thinks "neutral" is.

I took some shots today while out with my fam and was pleased with how they came out (purely as a remember the moment/fun type stuff and thats what I see this camera being for... so if they could work on auto WB i think it's a winner... (or just post process it I believe even picassa has some sort of WB adjustment


Very very cool you have definitely stumbled onto something
 
Upvote 0

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones