• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Root Rooted, want CM7, don't want to lose 4G

I read a few threads on here where people were suddenly unable to restore certain nandroids, IIRC it was more then one backup too. If this were to happen, is there a way to extract the keys from the nandroid? Or would you just be SOL if something happened?

That sort of thing is usually user error. If not, there's probably not going to be anything wrong with the wimax backup. There are several ways to fix such an issue to, at least, restore wimax, such as moving the wimax.img to another backup, and fixing the md5sum files, etc. Just know that if you lose your wimax keys, and have a bad backup (unlikely), we can probably get it fixed, still. That being said, if you're that paranoid, you can do a manual backup by running this from the terminal emulator:

su
mkdir -p /sdcard/nandroid/RSA-PR-BACKUP
cat /dev/mtd/mtd0 > /sdcard/nandroid/RSA-PR-BACKUP/wimax.img

I got that from here. Don't actually do anything in that thread. I'm just giving credit. Anyway, should you need to restore such a backup, you should be able to follow the instructions here. Really, though, you should be fine if you just make a nandroid backup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ghxost
Upvote 0
depends on what was causing the issue, you can extract the wimax.img from the nandroid with adb. I saw a thread on xda about restoring keys from a corrupted img. Looks like it can be done HOWEVER you would need to know what your keys were and what your cert was, basically it is a wimax.img template and you plug in your own info if so you would need to copy those things to your lappie.

And akaza linked the thread i was referring to so taaa daaa.
 
Upvote 0
sidenote, 6 hrs off charger with moderate useage(no different than usual monday activities) and 82% batt left!!!!!!!!!! OMFG!!!!!!! Lovin this new kernel!! Matt, you may also be interested in trying out the BFS kernel in my sig.... not linked yet, but i cant imagine that youd have trouble finding it lol


Yeah I tried bfs once upon a time ago, phone wasn't super happy but I may try again. I'm 8 hours off with decent usage and at 75. I left data on all day though which is a big difference and I usually don't.
 
Upvote 0
I need to try a BFS kernel. I'm running SZ 1.1 CFS right now and I don't think I've ever flashed a BFS build. Do some people actually find that their phone performs better with BFS?

I hate constantly switching kernels since my battery life the first 24 hours is hit or miss. It really seems to settle down on my phone a lot after a couple of days/charge cycles. Right now I'm at 59% at 8.5 hours off charger . But then the other day, with a settled SZ 1.0.1 CFS, I was at 20% after 24 hours of use after only being charged to 88% when I took it off the charger.
 
Upvote 0
I need to try a BFS kernel. I'm running SZ 1.1 CFS right now and I don't think I've ever flashed a BFS build. Do some people actually find that their phone performs better with BFS?

I hate constantly switching kernels since my battery life the first 24 hours is hit or miss. It really seems to settle down on my phone a lot after a couple of days/charge cycles. Right now I'm at 59% at 8.5 hours off charger . But then the other day, with a settled SZ 1.0.1 CFS, I was at 20% after 24 hours of use after only being charged to 88% when I took it off the charger.


Depends on what you are looking for bfs typically is better performance though if your screen is off enough you may get better battery. Basically consider cfs more flat line kind of performance and bfs a higher peaks and lower valleys...
 
Upvote 0
Depends on what you are looking for bfs typically is better performance though if your screen is off enough you may get better battery. Basically consider cfs more flat line kind of performance and bfs a higher peaks and lower valleys...
Yeah I get that, but it seems like people have more issues with BFS, and I don't know that I've ever seen someone who said that they get better battery life with it. But I haven't exactly gone looking for that info much either. I just flashed SZ 1.1.0 BFS by the way. So far it seems fine, seems about as responsive as CFS for me.
 
Upvote 0
Yeah I get that, but it seems like people have more issues with BFS, and I don't know that I've ever seen someone who said that they get better battery life with it. But I haven't exactly gone looking for that info much either. I just flashed SZ 1.1.0 BFS by the way. So far it seems fine, seems about as responsive as CFS for me.


Well it's the high peaks and low valleys that piss phones off sometimes. Takes a minute to wake from that low valley, lag etc
 
Upvote 0

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones