Root BAMF Control Freak 2.0 kernel, What are your settings?

[Ibrick]

So, those of you running Adrynalyne's new kernel, Control Freak 2.0, what kind of settings are running?

Have you UV'd even further?

I've settled on these settings for now, and it's running great so far. I was able to UV as far as 50mv lower than my posted settings and had no issues, but I wanted things as stable as possible so I bumped them back up. It does make me curious how far I could push things, but at the current settings with 'Green Power' I get more than adequate battery life. For the TBolt at least..

I'm running min 245, max 1480

Sleep max- 245
Ramp up step- 1280
Max ramp down- 1024
Max CPU load- 85%
Min CPU load- 30%

At the following voltages;

245 @ 850mv
368 @ 900mv
768 @ 1000mv
1024 @ 1050mv
1280 @ 1125mv
1480 @ 1175mv

For comparison, Adrynalyne's stock settings, and HTC's settings;

Adrynalyne:

245 @ 900mv
368 @ 950mv
768 @ 1025mv
1024 @ 1075mv
1280 @ 1150mv
1480 @ 1200mv

Factory HTC:

245 @ 1000mv
368 @ 1050mv
768 @ 1100mv
1024 @ 1100mv

 

[ridobe]

I didn't change any of the smartass settings, or to say I did but reverted back. All of my undervolting was exactly 100 less than what Adryn had all the way up to 1ghz. I didn't overclock so I stopped changing the values.

I ran very stable. I was suprised. However, wtf was up with my battery life? It drained faster than when I was stock unrooted. Can the UVing have an effect on this? I was running his 4.4.7 kernel prior to this and all was grand. The 2.0 was based on this. So, I take what was running great and undervolt it and the battery goes to s***.

 

[ballisticn8]

ok, i tried going through adryn's kernel thread but its like 200 pages or something.

what are the directions on custom setting voltage levels for the kernel?

 

[WormDoes]

Not running CF 2.0, but these are my voltages on LeanKernel 2.4.6 extreme version

184-750
245-750
368-825
768-850
1.0-950
1.2-1050
1.4-1100

I'm going to disable 184 as it can't run any lower than 750 and 245 can handle that, so 184 is pointless

 

[bjanow]

I didn't change any of the smartass settings, or to say I did but reverted back. All of my undervolting was exactly 100 less than what Adryn had all the way up to 1ghz. I didn't overclock so I stopped changing the values.

I ran very stable. I was suprised. However, wtf was up with my battery life? It drained faster than when I was stock unrooted. Can the UVing have an effect on this? I was running his 4.4.7 kernel prior to this and all was grand. The 2.0 was based on this. So, I take what was running great and undervolt it and the battery goes to s***.

Dude, you ain't kidding. My batt went to the crapper too with 2.0. I just flashed back to 4.4.7 and will monitor. Even without UV the batt sucks on 2.0.

 

[scotty85]

Dude, you ain't kidding. My batt went to the crapper too with 2.0. I just flashed back to 4.4.7 and will monitor. Even without UV the batt sucks on 2.0.

well heck! i just switched to cf 2.0. i havent changed any voltages,so i guess ill see how it goes

 

[digdug1]

Not running CF 2.0, but these are my voltages on LeanKernel 2.4.6 extreme version

184-750
245-750
368-825
768-850
1.0-950
1.2-1050
1.4-1100

I'm going to disable 184 as it can't run any lower than 750 and 245 can handle that, so 184 is pointless

im on the special edition 1.92x with these settings:

245 @ 750
368 @ 750
786 @ 850
1017 @ 950
1222 @ 1050
1408 @ 1125
im keeping my min set at 368 since my voltage is the same as 245.

this plus liquid 1.45 is a great combination!

 

[Ibrick]

Surprised u guys are having worse battery life on CF2.0.. since switching over to it, I've noticed a pretty decent increase in battery life..

 

[bjanow]

I know, it's nuts. But with 2.0 my batt dropped like a rock no matter the voltages or speed. I went back to 4.4.7 and even OCd to 1.28 just to test and batt life is back to normal, i.e. great. Oh well that's the way things go with these devices. That's why we root.. choices.

 

[howarmat]

every phone is different lol

I am using his settings right now, i might change them up a little and see

 

[ridobe]

Not running CF 2.0, but these are my voltages on LeanKernel 2.4.6 extreme version

184-750
245-750
368-825
768-850
1.0-950
1.2-1050
1.4-1100

I'm going to disable 184 as it can't run any lower than 750 and 245 can handle that, so 184 is pointless

I've since gone to Leankernel 2.5 extreme and I'm bump charging now. I have the exact same voltages as you except 245 is 800. I am using his interactivX governor now as he suggests it. We'll see.

 

[Ibrick]

I've since gone to Leankernel 2.5 extreme and I'm bump charging now. I have the exact same voltages as you except 245 is 800. I am using his interactivX governor now as he suggests it. We'll see.

Same here, I switched over the Imoseyon's 2.5.1

I like CF 2.0 and will probably go between the two. I find I cant leave the settings alone and am constantly fiddling with something when running CF2.0..

At least running 2.5.1 extreme, the 1.4ghz version, I'm limited to just playing with the voltages, which is much less addicting than playing with the smartass settings. I just leave it on InteractiveX and let it do it's thing.

Changed up my voltages from the OP..

Currently;

245 - 750
368 - 800
768 - 950
1017 - 1050
1222 - 1100
1408 - 1150

 

[jenseits]

I can't for the life of ne figure out why I can't edit the vdd file. I didn't have a problem til I flashed bamf remix 1.7. I used root explorer last time and it was fine but now I can't do anything to it