Nope, I'm right. 100k is not "3G", but some people on this forum have tried to claim Metro does. They do NOT. Metro's 100k - 170k is 2G speeds.
If you claim they have 3G you are dead wrong.
Even Metro management says they have 2G. I think they know their own network.
I never mentioned broadband so you are wrong again there too.
And my analogy was correct. So you are batting zero. I don't care how many 3G "parts" might be somewhere in Metro's network if they don't have 3G speed, they don't have 3G for our discussion purposes.
THIS below was 3G two years ago. Two freakin years ago, 2009. This is now 2011. You have to have at
least that to have 3G.