Yeah...but wouldn't it be hilarious if they were!?! Haha.
After all the upgrades and phones I raped from vzw, this may be a true story...lol
Upvote
0
Yeah...but wouldn't it be hilarious if they were!?! Haha.
Ok, I'm never one to dig on this, and make noise about phone releases being so close, and always being behind the curve when it comes to keeping up with Technology!
However, as Android fans, and Bionic owners we just got slapped by Moto and Vzw...
Why even release the Bionic, and then a month...A MONTH LATER, release a phone from the same phone manufacturer that beats out the previous one so bad when we talk about screens, and what not?
Yes the Razr comes with a Super Amoled qHD screen...seriously now? And the usual Dual core stuff, with probably a better camera that doesn't take a year to Auto Focus.
Yea I'm a little pissed! It is what it is! And I wouldn't even post if it was a new phone from HTC, Samsung (Prime) or LG! But coming from Moto, come on! Not cool moto, not cool VZW!
That can mean that one store pulled it because they got a bad batch.
Some silly assumptions going on in this thread. Say what you want about Motorola, but the Bionic is a good phone. It would be stupid for them not to release it. That being said, if the Razr is ready for primetime, it would be stupid not to release that too. There are plenty of people who held off on getting the Bionic for the Prime or another rumored phone. The Razr is now another choice for them to consider.
Remember, the Bionic came out September 8th. This phone is announced a month later. Good luck getting it in your hands this month. Mid november is the earliest in my opinion.
I think the Razr is going to be a great phone, I have a lot of faith in Motorola. Even phones that where "notorious" such as the DX2 where actually good phones, people just nitpick on room for improvement. Yes they could have given the X2 1GB of ram, but then what would be so impressive about the Bionic? Everyone wants every phone to have top of the line everything and I completely understand that. But you can't get mad that the Razr is coming out when it was understood that because of the delays, newer phones were right around the corner. You either were patient, and now you can get the Razr or the Prime. Or you got impatient and got the Bionic. If you don't like your Bionic that is a seperate issue. I love mine.
And to make this wall of text even larger, I don't see why everyone is acting like the Razr is going to be some gift from god! As has been stated above, it's specs are marginally better than the Bionics, nobody knows if the camera is better you are just speculating. If the screen is of such importance to you then you shouldn't have gotten the Bionic. I for one prefer battery life. Pentile looks fine to me, yes I can see "pixelation" if I look for it. But I don't look for it. And I get better outdoor visibility and better battery life for my sacrifice. And then there is this non-removable battery nonsense. I've ripped on Apple for years for this sinister business practice. I've had to battery pull my Bionic twice since getting it. What the heck happens on the Razr? Hopefully they code a kill switch into the power button like on a PC. All these points have already been mentioned, and some others I didn't mention like the lack of an extended battery. I guess what boggles me the most is how the news of a phone with such a big glaring design flaw, is upsetting to someone who is happy with their Bionic. It sounds to me like you are not satisfied, and are using this as an excuse. If that is the case, then I'm sorry but you messed up. Better luck next year.
Why do people care? If you are content with what your can do, them be happy. That razr phone isn't any better.
Yea the screen is different, (wont really say better cuz thats a matter of opinion), yea the cpu is a wee bit faster, yea it seems to have an upgraded front camera..
Only thing that blows me away is the rated talk time. I hope thats true. I will take a non removable battery anyday in Android land with that talk time.
galaxy nexus also looks alot better spec wise than the razor. 720P screen also is AWESOME!!!
I find it hilarious when people say a 720P screen on something that is 4 inches big is going to be any better than most other screens...
720P resolution only looks different to the human eye (from 480(not sure exactly, is it 480p?)) if the screen is about 20-25 inches big. Same as the simple fact that 720p is NOT different than 1080p unless the screen is bigger than 40 inches.
There is only so much that you cant fit on a 4 inch screen.
I find it hilarious when people say a 720P screen on something that is 4 inches big is going to be any better than most other screens...
720P resolution only looks different to the human eye (from 480(not sure exactly, is it 480p?)) if the screen is about 20-25 inches big. Same as the simple fact that 720p is NOT different than 1080p unless the screen is bigger than 40 inches.
There is only so much that you cant fit on a 4 inch screen.
I find it hilarious when people say a 720P screen on something that is 4 inches big is going to be any better than most other screens...
720P resolution only looks different to the human eye (from 480(not sure exactly, is it 480p?)) if the screen is about 20-25 inches big. Same as the simple fact that 720p is NOT different than 1080p unless the screen is bigger than 40 inches.
There is only so much that you cant fit on a 4 inch screen.
We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.