• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Anyone reading the Jobs bio?

Negative. Don't really care much for the guy. However, I did see a short tid bit about him on 60 Minutes last night. It wasn't exactly doing his image any favors. They basically called him a moron.

Yeah, he came off as a jerk albeit a brilliant one. Still, it's a story of a guy who came from poverty to become a multi-millionaire by the time he was 25 and he did it in the tech industry despite having little or no knowledge of coding, electronics, etc....
 
Upvote 0
by perfecting or "borrowing" other peoples work.

The Mac interface and mouse were a Xerox design.

It's hypocrisy like this that makes me dislike Apple's "they stole our ideas, we must sue" attitude.


Right, but Xerox had neither the know how, the money and/or the team to turn it into what Jobs and Woz did. You obviously don't know much about business and marketing because its VERY seldom the person/company who originates the idea that cashes in on it and makes it a success.
 
Upvote 0
Right, but Xerox had neither the know how, the money and/or the team to turn it into what Jobs and Woz did. You obviously don't know much about business and marketing because its VERY seldom the person/company who originates the idea that cashes in on it and makes it a success.
I know enough about business.

I had the misfortune of working very close with marketing types very early in my career and have avoided them like the plague ever since :D

I write the code and let the suits figure out what to do with it.
 
Upvote 0
Right, but Xerox had neither the know how, the money and/or the team to turn it into what Jobs and Woz did. You obviously don't know much about business and marketing because its VERY seldom the person/company who originates the idea that cashes in on it and makes it a success.

The 60 minutes crowd mentioned the bluebox back in the day. For those who don't remember the glories of pulse dialing, the bluebox was a device that phone hackers used to emulate the tones phone companies used to route calls. Someone could use a bluebox to make free long distance calls. Woz made these as a hobby just as a prank thing. Jobs saw them and started selling them to make money. I don't know that Xerox didn't have the know how or money or what it was, but Jobs did the same type of thing over and over again. He took someone else's idea, polished it up and sold it as his own. He got pissed when people did the same to him though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drhyde
Upvote 0
Right, but Xerox had neither the know how, the money and/or the team to turn it into what Jobs and Woz did. You obviously don't know much about business and marketing because its VERY seldom the person/company who originates the idea that cashes in on it and makes it a success.

There was Xerox.

There was the Palo Alto Research Center, owned by Xerox. PARC gang - not typical Xerox gang.

People do things. PARC had the know-how. Xerox just didn't care.

The part about Xerox lacking money back in the day, I think we should take up another time.

Jobs bio - next interesting one will be Gates'.

Whole lotta revisionist history in this industry. Whole lot.

Jobs and Apple didn't steal PARC tech - they bought it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: psychotron
Upvote 0
by perfecting or "borrowing" other peoples work.

The Mac interface and mouse were a Xerox design.

It's hypocrisy like this that makes me dislike Apple's "they stole our ideas, we must sue" attitude.

I recall something from the new book. Corrections are always welcome. Regarding Google and Android: "it's a stolen product." "I will spend my last dying breath if I need to," Jobs told his biographer, "and I will spend every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank, to right this wrong."
 
  • Like
Reactions: EarlyMon
Upvote 0
^Those comments are being attributed to the book in reviews, certainly.

I hope both sides are treated failrly. That is to say, Mr. Jobs and the readers.

Not sure how much Steve actually participated, but one can likely believe that although the book might not necessarily be a love letter to Mr. Jobs and to a lesser degree, Apple, (Very hard to separate one from the other) Mr. Jobs likely had his own personal view of Mr. Jobs that is probably different than what we understand about Mr. Jobs.

I am also certain that Mr. Walter Isaacson recieved a fine advance.

Apparently, SJ was arrogant, did not care for Microsoft, despized Googler/Android, and was poorly paid at a buck a year.

I'll wait untill it is marked down at Border's to decide one way or another.
 
Upvote 0
According to the author, Jobs did not even see an advance copy of the book and had no say over what was in it other than what he actually told the author in interviews of course. The author does say that Jobs saw the original cover, hated it and helped design the current one.

I am not prepared to doubt the author. That said, I know that some public people try to influence what is written about them when they work closely with the author. Again, not suggesting anything untoward, just saying.
 
Upvote 0

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones