I agree that most of what he said is true. I never liked the camera on the Droid, but I knew that before I ever purchased mine. I don't use camera's on cell phones really anyway. His comment about the battery door seems a little out of date though. I've had my droid for 2 weeks now, and the battery door is actually very stiff and a little tough to get off. I understand this was a problem at launch, but for an article written and posted in early February, this info seems out of date.
His comments on the iPhone being the hip inner city sidekick was interesting, as I mostly see hipster suburbanites with one. Sure there are plenty in the city that use them, but no more than any other phone. I understand that apple is "hip". But calling the Droid an "everyman's" phone seems a bit misplaced. I would think that the iPhone would be considered the "everyman's" phone due to the smoother, simpler, more "intuitive" interface. The Droid is, in my opinion, more for techies, for people that like gadgets, want to customize, etc. The Droid isn't a pretty phone like the iPhone, so it won't get as many looks from as many random people as the iPhone does. The advertising campaign blitz by Verizon made people sit up and take notice, sure, but even the "Droooiiid" advertising campaign is definitely more aimed a techies, sci fi people, gadget lovers, etc.