• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Who's getting a Nexus and doesn't have LTE?

Do you currently have LTE in your area?

  • Yes and so excited to use it on my Nexus!

    Votes: 50 51.5%
  • Nope, but I need to have a Nexus anyway.

    Votes: 40 41.2%
  • Not yet, but I should be getting it any day now :(

    Votes: 7 7.2%

  • Total voters
    97
  • Poll closed .

breadnatty08

pain rustique
Nov 8, 2009
19,884
6,125
I've been following the Pre-Release thread for the Galaxy Nexus (phew, what a rush!) and have seen quite a few folks say they don't live in an area with 4G LTE coverage. I live in DC and with my Bionic (yep, it's going to the wife when I get my Nexus :p) I get incredible download speeds. With the occasional drop of data, which is a known issue on most of the LTE phones, it's a huge step up from my Droid.
My question is, are folks getting this phone without having LTE coverage in their area? Is it a big issue to you? Are you upgrading from another LTE phone, is this your first one?
 
No LTE here. Can't see it in the immediate future either (i can't even get DSL or broadband cable!) But i want the phone for the software basically. I'll keep the 4G off almost all the time.

Eesh. When my parents first moved to IN several years ago, they weren't able to get broadband in their neighborhood. I was naively flabergasted :rolleyes:
I know the phone is going to be amazing without it, but I'm curious how many others are making this a big selling point for them.
 
Upvote 0
I'm within 2 hours of lte; I have no clue when it will be in my area though. Since I don't tend to upgrade until 20-24 months, it's likely to be here during the life of the phone. This will be my first Android; I currently have an Omnia 2.
I'm in the same boat. Currently have the Omnia II, and waiting for the Galaxy Nexus, and I live about an hour and 20 minutes away from an LTE area. Can't wait for the Galaxy Nexus!
 
Upvote 0
I seriously considering an HSPA+ international version and staying with Tmobile...


As long as I can get 32GB I'm not worried about the speed differences. It's hard to leave unlimited data for VZ.... even though the VZ network would be better and faster... I'd potentially pay though the nose if I was developing an app I needed to test on 3g/4g
 
Upvote 0
With all the delays, lack of information, and a bunch of other BS, I should have just gotten the 4S. The only thing holding my back is the stupid glass on the iPhone.

I have a feeling that Apple has taken a huge bite out of Android that will not be truly seen for 2-3 years. When Schmidt is worried about Siri as a search engine, you know there is a great concern at Google.
 
Upvote 0
With all the delays, lack of information, and a bunch of other BS, I should have just gotten the 4S. The only thing holding my back is the stupid glass on the iPhone.

I have a feeling that Apple has taken a huge bite out of Android that will not be truly seen for 2-3 years. When Schmidt is worried about Siri as a search engine, you know there is a great concern at Google.


Ehhh....I would not believe that for a second, He was only saying that to get big brother off his back. The last thing he needs is people believing there's a monopoly ANYWHERE. If anything I would say that the iPhone is slumping and Siri is the only thing that is going to rescue them at all. You can only make the same device for so long before people realize that they are not getting anything new. Android is selling 550,000 handsets a day and has 2 hundred million activated worldwide....They are not worried about anything.
 
Upvote 0
I don't understand why Verizon doesn't sell 3G and 4G versions of their phones. I would consider a 3G only version if it was $100 cheaper than the 4G. While 4G is impressive it's one of those nice to have features. Most cell phone users aren't power users and would opt for a cheaper 3G version. The lower price point would also make it more competitive against the fruit phone.
 
Upvote 0
I don't understand why Verizon doesn't sell 3G and 4G versions of their phones. I would consider a 3G only version if it was $100 cheaper than the 4G. While 4G is impressive it's one of those nice to have features. Most cell phone users aren't power users and would opt for a cheaper 3G version. The lower price point would also make it more competitive against the fruit phone.

The development, manufacturing and stocking costs to have two phones of the same spec but different radios is probably FAR more than the actual sales they'd generate with the lower cost phone, especially when you consider that they might be cannibalizing the higher cost phone from people who might have opted to pay the extra money if the lower cost phone wasn't there.
 
Upvote 0

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones