Which one, Im having a really hard time to choose one. I do like sense ui and thats steering me towards the Desire more at the moment. So would like some more opinions.
If I flashed Desire onto it would that invalidate the N1 warranty?
Also, are the buttons at the bottom of the N1 that bad?
Also, I hadn't thought about this before: you can probably root your Desire and put stock Android on it if you prefer not having Sense, but I need someone to confirm that for me. Can't see why it wouldn't work. And I guess that would mean you can get instant updates from Google like Nexus users.
If I got the Desire it wouldnt be on contract it would be outright purchase so either way I guess both would have to be shipped to HTC for repairs?
I like the Nexus buttons but I like the Desires pad, overall the Nexus imo is a better looking phone. But Desire has Sense, but is also 1 1/2 months away... sigh.
.....These are just my opinions.
As for running Sense on the N1 being as fast as the Desire... they've ported the Sense/2.1 ROM to the DROID and it runs FLUIDLY. I don't think that it will be a problem for the N1 to handle.
If you have 100MB of free RAM then you have 100MB of wasted RAM. RAM is meant to be used. It frustrates me that people tout how much free RAM they have. Having all your apps running with 100MB of RAM free or 16MB of RAM free should provide no perceivable difference.
Apps2SD doesn't free up RAM; it frees up ROM.
...
That's cute, but I'll bet anything that your average PC with 2 GB of RAM with a lot of Firefox tabs open will run more sluggishly than a PC with 4 GB of RAM and the same number of tabs open. But hey, sure, whatever you say.
Don't recall saying that apps2sd frees up RAM. Reading comprehension and all that.
Oh yeah, and most custom ROMs reallocate /dalvik-cache free up about 40-50 MB of internal storage. One of the many reasons I can't live with the stock ROM: unoptimized, wasted space.
Just look at apps2sd and the kernels that let you use all of the N1's RAM.
Er, also ported to the N1. Before the Droid, actually...
Let's bet on it. We're not talking about the performance bottlenecks that bely computers where a CPU needs to wait for a HDD to deliver data or that an OS and its system processes are occupying a large portion of the available RAM. Unless you're running so many apps at the same time that those apps are competing for memory cap space, you're not going to see a perceivable difference. Adding 17-20% more RAM where RAM isn't a bottleneck is not going to improve overall system performance. I mean, it's not like our devices are running Windows Vista here!
But yeah, I guess if you're running a dozen or more apps and have just about every system process running at the same time, then yeah, you're right... Good to have more RAM.
You use a copulative conjunction ("and") which unites the two words in the same line of thought. You followed it by the use of the relative pronoun ("that"), creating a restrictive clause, whereby the clause "let you use..." refers back to the linked nouns. So yeah, my bad for being grammatically correct in reading your sentence.
We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.