• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Change in our Tethering policy (and our approach to some other content)

Phases

NO LONGER ADMIN
Sep 9, 2008
9,068
20,634
Nashville, TN
The tethering policy that we have held here at AF for a long time has now been lifted, as well as our approach to some potentially illegal content. After a long period of discussion between administration and the moderators, we're doing what we feel is best for the Android community and AF in general.

While we as a forum do NOT endorse nor encourage illegal or immoral activity (such as tethering against your TOS, call recording against state law, altering key phone identifiers against carrier policy, etc) - we will no longer blindly ban all conversations relating to such discussions on a site-wide basis. There are so many grey areas that it's simply impossible to continuously determine what is and isn't acceptable in a consistent manner without stifling conversation and muzzling freedom of speech. While AndroidForums.com technically "owns" the content posted on the site, each user is responsible for the lawfulness of their posts and we take no responsibility for what a user chooses to post or ask here.

We will no longer target tethering or other breach-of-TOS conversations on AF. Android related actions that may be illegal in some states (recording phone calls is the best example here) will also be left alone. We will, however, continue to target piracy, copyright infringement, and endorsement of hate crimes, etc etc.

Please know that any information posted here is ours to do what we wish with - including providing account information tied to threads/posts if a court or law enforcement agencies were to ask for it. (Not that we expect that to ever happen) We will, under our sole discretion, comply with law enforcement requests for certain data should we be approached. It will be up to the end user to ensure what they do here remains within the boundaries of the law and agreements they make with carriers, and they will accept ultimate responsibility for any consequences for a breach.

Much like YouTube's policies, we will assume our users are acting within the boundaries of the law, will investigate situations where we're notified of illegal material, and will cooperate with 3rd parties who request we take down information that is shared illegaly. With that said, we still reserve the right to remove any content for any reason we see fit (this is a privately owned site, after all).

To those who are against this: Please understand we cannot please everyone, and this is what we feel is best for the community and the site. Please simply avoid any threads that you don't agree with.

Our staff will not aide in helping users find or create information that is actually illegal. Illegal vs against TOS are two different things and each situation will be taken on a case by case basis. The information may reside on the site - but it will be up to the members to find it or point each other to it. Staff will absolutely not take part in this, and can lose their badge for doing so. (For the record, tethering is not considered illegal.)

In using this site you are agreeing that you understand and will comply with the terms stated above. The site's terms of service, to which all members must agree, have been updated to reflect this change. All site stickies concerning this will be updated or removed shortly.

Thank you.
 
I had no problem with the old policy, this is nice. I have tethered against the TOS, only for the curiosity factor of it. I actually did it with a VZW netbook with unlimited 3G access, how ironic. Anyway, this new policy seems consistent with what I have seen with the posts on the site. Generally to keep it legal and honest. I am a parent and want nothing less from my children than I do from the forum posters. Kudos to the owner, admins, mods, guides, and any others involve for having a great community.
 
Upvote 0
Well you can't be locking tethering threads [like mine that was posted today in LG OV section] if your going to allow and have rooting and breaking threads and forum section.

Using tethering on my OV, which is a built in stock function, doing no root or mods, just downloading an app from the built in market. is legal.

and "Here's something to consider. According to the Privacy Policy that ships on every Android phone, 3rd party apps don't violate the TOS. They can follow their own rules. As far as I know this includes GingerBreak, PDANet, FoxFi etc."

which means makes it all legal.

locking threads about tethering is messed up.

unlock my thread plz. Ive gone above and beyond to only do what my stock phone can physically do with out rooting or breaking.

http://androidforums.com/lg-optimus-v/490497-virgin-ov-2-2-2-wifi-hotspot-tethering.html
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChazzMatt
Upvote 0
Well you can't be locking tethering threads [like mine that was posted today in LG OV section] if your going to allow and have rooting and breaking threads and forum section.

Using tethering on my OV, which is a built in stock function, doing no root or mods, just downloading an app from the built in market. is legal.

and "Here's something to consider. According to the Privacy Policy that ships on every Android phone, 3rd party apps don't violate the TOS. They can follow their own rules. As far as I know this includes GingerBreak, PDANet, FoxFi etc."

which means makes it all legal.

locking threads about tethering is messed up.

unlock my thread plz.

http://androidforums.com/lg-optimus-v/490497-virgin-ov-2-2-2-wifi-hotspot-tethering.html

The action on your thread was taken before the policy change, and per your request, it's now re-opened.

No need for further frustrations on legalities, per Phases' post, tethering isn't illegal and is up to you and your carrier to sort out.
 
Upvote 0
Awesome,:) after I joined, here, it gets better and better every day...

Hey everybody, come to the dark side, we have cookies and milk here!!!

Anybody????

I could give you Darth Vader's personal number...for [size=+1]free[/size]!!! Listen....[size=+1]free[/size]. Repeat...[size=+1]free[/size]. Use it in the sentence..... Damn.....it's really hard to be a darksider these days.....:( ..nahh just kidding:D:D:D

==================================================================================================

Really nice changes, guys, it makes everything, a lot simpler - to everyone.

Peace out, guys:cool:
 
Upvote 0
My hat is off to Rob and Phases. Although I complied with the more restrictive policy, it did bother me and frankly I found myself spending less time here for fear of a slip of the tongue. This is huge IMO and has seriously renewed my desire to contribute regularly again. Thanks for standing up for internet FOS.
 
Upvote 0
Amen, and about time! I have thought that a laissez-faire attitude toward tethering was the wisest course of action for a long time now. Glad to see that the powers that be have now arrived at the same conclusion! The site will be better off now because of this decision. Cheers!

Kind of says it all, right there. ^ ;)
 
Upvote 0
nothing ...

just that the major / most usa carriers do not allow you to do it.. it is in their contract that you signed.. you must pay them a monthly fee to do it.

Thats not entirely true... I can only speak for sprint cuz thats who I use, but there is nothing in the TOS that says anything about tethering.. In fact, sprint has no issue with tethering at all, it is an option on the phone to tether a laptop or whatever via usb, if you use their wireless tether app, they charge you $X/mo, but it does not say in the TOS that you cannot download a 3rd party app to do so, just that they charge for their app...
 
  • Like
Reactions: EarlyMon
Upvote 0
Sorry, late to this conversation...

I'm comfortable with these changes. It makes staff jobs easier to no longer be de facto enforcers of the carriers' policies, and having a lighter touch probably makes the place friendlier for our visitors as well.

US-centric side note: There is no freedom of speech issue, as that's a concept that applies only to government censorship. There is no Constitutional right for anybody to be able to say anything they want in someone else's private venue (such as AF).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seanette
Upvote 0
US-centric side note: There is no freedom of speech issue, as that's a concept that applies only to government censorship. There is no Constitutional right for anybody to be able to say anything they want in someone else's private venue (such as AF).

Quite true, that ^.

In addition, online forums are not little democracies, even though some say they are. :D

If we were to superimpose the "lifestyle" or culture of a successful forum cluster, such as AF, on a country or state or city, etc, that place would be seen as quite the restrictive environment, especially with regard to maintaining order, but also in how the "streets" etc are kept tidy and so on. ;)

Bickering and other unsavory or disruptive behaviors out in the real world are common, for example; no laws broken. Here that stuff is shut down as quickly as possible so productive discourse can continue, or just joking around a bit can continue with no little verbal slap fights erupting. :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueBiker
Upvote 0
Bickering and other unsavory or disruptive behaviors out in the real world are common, for example; no laws broken. Here that stuff is shut down as quickly as possible so productive discourse can continue, or just joking around a bit can continue with no little verbal slap fights erupting. :D

Yep, Wild West at some forums, make sure to wear your flame-reta rdant suit. Yeehaw! :rolleyes:
 
Upvote 0

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones