I will use the heck out of it. At my gym, you can get the audio of the various TVs there by tuning into it's FM channel. It would have been great to hear the audio of what you're watching on the TV while on the treadmill.
Unfortunately, you need a wired headset to use it since the wire acts as an antenna. I have an A2DP bluetooth headset that wil be useless for listening to FM.
I will use the heck out of it. At my gym, you can get the audio of the various TVs there by tuning into it's FM channel. It would have been great to hear the audio of what you're watching on the TV while on the treadmill.
Sure that works since the switch to DTV? The audio you used to listen to was for the analog TV signals. I'm pretty sure the audio was moved when the video was switched.
What do you need wireless N for? Wireless G is not even a bottleneck for current mobile phones even with 1ghz snapdragon. The only benefit of wireless N would be range. Most people dont even use wifi.
" Making good on its newly-signed NFL deal, Verizon Wireless has unveiled NFL Mobile, a free sports news and information app optimized for several of the carrier's smartphones.
Verizon Wireless plans to add training camp updates and preseason tilts, along with live streaming simulcasts of NBC's Sunday Night Football and NFL Network's Thursday Night Football as the season progresses, according to the report. "
What do you need wireless N for? Wireless G is not even a bottleneck for current mobile phones even with 1ghz snapdragon. The only benefit of wireless N would be range.Most people dont even use wifi.
I will use the heck out of it. At my gym, you can get the audio of the various TVs there by tuning into it's FM channel. It would have been great to hear the audio of what you're watching on the TV while on the treadmill.
Unfortunately, you need a wired headset to use it since the wire acts as an antenna. I have an A2DP bluetooth headset that wil be useless for listening to FM.
No, its not faster when coupled with smartphones. Even the fastest smart phone today still does not have enough computational power to take advantage of even wireless G speeds.
People please get a proper education before posting....
No, its not faster when coupled with smartphones. Even the fastest smart phone today still does not have enough computational power to take advantage of even wireless G speeds.
People please get a proper education before posting....
Listen, I'm not going to make this a pissing contest, but for you to say that a wireless G network is no different in speed than a wireless N network is just plain ignorant on your part. Why in the world do you think they invented the wireless N network in the first place? Nevermind, don't answer that. You're the one that needs an education.
What do you need wireless N for? Wireless G is not even a bottleneck for current mobile phones even with 1ghz snapdragon. The only benefit of wireless N would be range. Most people dont even use wifi.
Listen, I'm not going to make this a pissing contest, but for you to say that a wireless G network is no different in speed than a wireless N network is just plain ignorant on your part. Why in the world do you think they invented the wireless N network in the first place? Nevermind, don't answer that. You're the one that needs an education.
You just made yourself look stupid. The person your in a feud with is correct. For faster wireless devices such as a laptop or etc, the N speed is faster then b/g, but for smartphones which lack the power to render pages at the speed they would get the data from n wouldnt improve page load time etc due to the phones lack of processing power... sure there is a 1ghz processor but clock speed isnt everything
Also webpages are like a couple 100 kb or what? U really think b/g doesnt get that almost instantly off wifi? b/g isnt whats slowing load times
I'd just like to add that some people's routers run slower (on all connected devices) when they have even one device running g vs all of them running n. Sure you could get a better router that does it right, but that really isn't the point.
As for the FM radio, I understand the need to have the headphones connected because they are the antenna, but can you change the audio output device to the speaker, or possibly bluetooth? I know it seems a little silly, but while running (on the treadmill) it would be lighter not carrying it, and it might keep your phone cleaner.
I can see the merits in both of your arguments. N IS faster, and has more range, however, chris is probably right in that the Incredible may not be able to load pages at the full 100+MB/s rate at which 802.11n is capable of. I don't think the incredible can process data that quickly. But we only have an 13 days!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.