1) While Sprint may have good service they rarely get good phones. While the evo may be nice, I know myself and I like to have the latest and greatest. The evo will be Sprint's flagship for at least 1 year and they won't be picking up anything else during that time. I need more options than that.
2) While the screen is 4.3in, it is using the old TFT technology. AMOLED is definitely what the future screens are moving towards, so I would rather go with that.
3) there is not much difference between 4.3 and 4"
4) The Hummingbird processor pisses on the snapdraggon
5) I like being on a carrier that uses sim cards so I can import nice phones from europe and austrailia. I just like having options.
Well for those of us outside the US its not a option anyway, But if it was a option the Galaxy S still has these features that the EVO does'nt:
Super Amoled Screen.
Better Processor.
Better GPU.
Internal Memory + Card Slot.
DLNA.
Bluetooth 3.0.
DivX/XviD Support.
But the EVO still looks like a awesome phone and it has the same screen as my fiancee's HD2 which is still a very nice screen plus it still has a better camera and a flash.
im gonna go with doctajay's answer!! he made a perfect point good job doctajay!!! and also i noticed that HTC devices doesn't take good pictures for some reason so i don't think mega pixel really matters here because i know for a fact that Samsung takes awesome pictures!!! only thing galaxy s is missing is flash for the camera... if galaxy s had flash for the camera.... it would have been ALMOST perfect android phone (well with froyo update of course) can't wait to get this device in my hand!!!!
I want to keep my cheap plan on T-Mobile and I want the latest and greatest. I'm willing to wait till end of July to decide on a phone to get and it's probably going to be the Galaxy S from the looks of it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.