• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

EVO camera blind test

Which video was better?

  • Left

    Votes: 3 1.6%
  • Right

    Votes: 180 98.4%

  • Total voters
    183
I am no fanboy of HTC nor Apple. Seriously. I just hate being tricked.

iPhone 3GS on the right.
EVO on the left.

i highly recommend you watch ONLY the right side of the video. and then ONLY the left side of the video. the motion blur is horrible on the EVO.

if anyone wants more comparisons, it'll take me a bit but i'll try to get them out. as far as the lighting, there was ample light in the room. at least for the "3 MP" iPhone. i'm telling you guys, HTC compresses the crap out of the video. 8MP or 500MP, it's really what you voted on that matters, not how big the stupid MP number is.
 
Upvote 0
I was gonna say that the "photographer" was not as steady with the camera on the left. It looks almost like the erratic movement was intentional. With that said...who ****in' cares. We all know if we are not getting what we want out of an Android product that there are(or will be) ways to optimize it! This phone is new. We will figure it out. In the mean time, do not tie your whole being up in it. It is just a phone.

why would I or anyone do this? i am not a apple employee or HTC CEO. i just want my dollars to count.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EarlyMon
Upvote 0
at least for the "3 MP" iPhone.

The other issue is that 3 mp camera needs only to power 3megapixels, then light up the resolution needed for the picture.

A 8 megapixel camera will have to power the 8 megapixels, and light up the need resolution.

Which means, no matter how you downgrade the resolution of the video it is still going to have 8 megapixel of noise, which is going to suffer in lower light. There is no way around this, the more megapixel you power, the more heat, the more noise, the higher the iso you have to go. Just the way the senor works.

The 3 megapixel is using 1/2 to 1/4 the power of the 8 megapixel, which means that you can really up the power and keep the noise down when compared to 8 megapixel.

This is why the films like avatar, star wars ( the latest ones), and even lord of the rings where shot with 1.67 to 2 megapixel camera (kind of complicated). 1920x1080 is all you need for highest definition.

So your "offical" test is kind of invalid because you are using difference sensors. But it is only a phone. If you want good video, get a good camera.
 
Upvote 0
I was gonna say that the "photographer" was not as steady with the camera on the left. It looks almost like the erratic movement was intentional.

Last year, I bought 6 different video cameras. I've seen how different sensor react to motion and how they compare to each other. What you are seeing is bad motion jello-effect. Mostly due to the sensor design.

The EVO sensor is made by Omnivision. If you notice, the fps drops real quick when the lighting condition gets darker. I've seem 10fps videos from the EVO. That tells me, it is a cheap sensor.

The ideal camera will be 720p/30fps in all lighting conditions. iPhone 4 may deliver on that.
 
Upvote 0
So your "offical" test is kind of invalid because you are using difference sensors. But it is only a phone. If you want good video, get a good camera.

Invalid or not, just look at the video and vote with your eyes. I don't think anyone cares about sensor jargon. Period. There is a reason HTC is advertising the 8MP camera. They know people want "more" megapixels regardless of quality.

And I have a good camera, but I also have other nice things.

The point is not what I have, but how HTC's 2010 Camera compares to the competitions 2008 camera.
 
Upvote 0
I am no fanboy of HTC nor Apple. Seriously. I just hate being tricked.

iPhone 3GS on the right.
EVO on the left.

i highly recommend you watch ONLY the right side of the video. and then ONLY the left side of the video. the motion blur is horrible on the EVO.

if anyone wants more comparisons, it'll take me a bit but i'll try to get them out. as far as the lighting, there was ample light in the room. at least for the "3 MP" iPhone. i'm telling you guys, HTC compresses the crap out of the video. 8MP or 500MP, it's really what you voted on that matters, not how big the stupid MP number is.
Thanks for the video. It's really a shame that such a great piece of hardware tech as the Evo is equipped with a cheap camera sensor.
 
Upvote 0
My problem with the video is that the left is way too dark in comparison to the right to be the same lighting conditions IMO. Now if the person would be so kind as to pan around the entire room to show the lighting conditions are the same I would be more inclined to believe it. (the shades look like they are drawn in the one on the left & you cannot see the lighting conditions on the right) and you cannot see if the lights are on.

It's not the lighting conditions at issue, it's the camera metering. The sensor has nothing to do with it, it's the settings the camera chooses to shoot the scene. Clearly the camera on the right boosts ISO to a greater degree to get a shorter shutter speed.

That's photography 101.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EarlyMon
Upvote 0
Thanks for the video. It's really a shame that such a great piece of hardware tech as the Evo is equipped with a cheap camera sensor.
Nice comparison work. I may have to fire up the Pre and compare that one as well once I get it back from warranty work.

Perhaps it may not be a sensor issue as much as it is an encoding one. It might be possible that there is a software-based improvement to be made. I for one know that the Pre and iPhone record at a much higher sound sampling frq. and bitrate and there is room for software improvement on that side of things.
 
Upvote 0
reemas please go outside in sunlight and take a video with the cameras on the ground and some objects moving (you or balls or a dog or whatever). For indoor, can you set it on a table or use a tripod?

I agree with your points, we voted on what we preferred plain and simple. There's a lot of variables with moving the camera/phone around so the tripod/tabletop should resolve that variable.
 
Upvote 0
What's his next test. Let see how a movie looks on the Iphone compared to the Evo but lets make it fair by taping electrical tape around the screen to make it the exact size. What is it buddy are you scared to unleash the true potential of the Evo so you drop it down by not one resolution but TWO. If your going to make a test please do it like i see on any Iphone vs anything site and go all out. If the Iphone had a higher setting i promise he would not have lowered that setting. Boooo i want a hamburger with fries.

In this current implementation of video recording, changing the resolution to 720p does not improve the frame rate of the recording which is the main issue being demonstrated/criticized here: low frame rates with challenging levels of indoor lighting.

In fact, if anything, the frame rates would get worse as you go from a lower to higher resolution.

Increasing the resolution would be irrelevant. Similarly, recording/shooting photos in daylight is not challenging to most sensors/video implementations, so suggestions to shoot video outside are irrelevant for this test as well--both cameras will do it well. That's like testing a BMW and Hyundai to see how well they can drive through a school zone; every car goes 5 mph just fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EarlyMon
Upvote 0
In this current implementation of video recording, changing the resolution to 720p does not improve the frame rate of the recording which is the main issue being demonstrated/criticized here: low frame rates with challenging levels of indoor lighting.

In fact, if anything, the frame rates would get worse as you go from a lower to higher resolution.

Increasing the resolution would be irrelevant. Similarly, recording/shooting photos in daylight is not challenging to most sensors/video implementations, so suggestions to shoot video outside are irrelevant for this test as well--both cameras will do it well. That's like testing a BMW and Hyundai to see how well they can drive through a school zone; every car goes 5 mph just fine.

they do find at 5mph but can both do good at 100mph
 
Upvote 0
I'm not surprised. I'll tell you first hand that in most practical situations for sending pics to friends my Black Berry Tour with a 3.2megapixel camera took far better pictures then the EVO. Outside in the daylight the EVO takes amazing pictures but for practical pictures, like taking a picture of something close and sending to a friend as "hey did you see this" or something the Tour owns the EVO. I bet the 5mp on the iPhone tears the EVO to pieces.
 
Upvote 0
The iPhone one looks better... Heck, I have a Evo and I can accept that. Why are people being so defensive as if someone is attacking their religion or something? The Evo excels in a lot of other ways over the iPhone but I do think they just wanted to be able to write 8mp and 720p on paper so it looks good and sells. The 720 video doesn't look as good as it should and neither do the pictures... it all has to do with the sensor. I can guarantee all of you that the new iPhone 4's camera may only be a 5mp but it's going to take some really good pictures.

I love the Evo a lot, and the camera takes good enough video and pictures for a cell phone and that's good enough for me. I'm not going to nit-pick. If I want to take good pictures, i'll get a good CAMERA out.

Note: I'd really like to know what 3 blind people clicked on "left" in the poll. lmao
 
Upvote 0
In fact, if anything, the frame rates would get worse as you go from a lower to higher resolution.

This, exactly.

I was hoping I didn't have to explain it to some guy brought this up. Thought we all knew 720p would look WORSE in terms of frame rates. The only thing 720p does it make the resolution larger.

Also guys, the bitrates were as follows:
(I didn't choose these settings, the phone/camera did automatically...)

iPhone 3Gs: 3700kbps
EVO: 970kbps

Framerates were:
iPhone: 23 frames/sec
EVO: 9 frames/sec

All this info is DIRECT from the files off the phones. (Audio wasn't included but the EVO really, really compresses the audio.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: EarlyMon
Upvote 0
Capture2.PNG

YouTube - Boom

I have the lights off with the Tv paused. This is what 9 frames per second looks like buddy. So When you made that video you had the lights off like me with only some parts of the tv screen to light you up. Shoot i even dirty the lens just to get it that low. Come on guy you were caught. Be honest 9 frames per second?????? You must have a lemon then.
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
If he post the original source video, will you retract your comments? The files can easily be viewed and the meta-data can be extracted in an app like VLC.

I've seen it go down to 10fps when the metering goes crazy.
He is not the first either:

http://androidforums.com/htc-evo-4g/92774-mediainfo-output-evos-hd-video-capture.html

The camera goes down from 16-10fps in low light. This is a fact.

Ok 10fps when there is very low light like i just proved with almost no light. Meaning no outdoor sunlight influence correct. But there is plenty of light Not enough for it to go to 9 frames per second. I stand with the words i wrote or then there is no such thing as free speech correct. If he or she wants to prove it. Prove it. I would love to study the original file and see why it dropped to 9 frames per second. I have been working on making the resolution higher and also maybe i can stop it from dropping that low and make a zip file for people to flash. Root of course needed to flash ZIP. But i have never gotten that low unless i tried. Once i receive the original i'll run a test to see the actual frames per second as the video is playing.
 
Upvote 0
Brush up on your Digital Camera language folks. The Digital sensor in the EVO is a newer generation of sensor than whats in the Iphone 3GS, and it's manufactured by the same company, same technology, same production processes..... the words cheap is a poor way to describe the sensor.

More Mega Pixel does not equal better quality. Generically, you getter better quality from larger pixels (pixel pitch) and larger camera sensors. In reality there are many specs to the camera sensor that really dictate the "quality". I'll try to keep it as simple as possible.

The Iphone 3GS has a 1/4 camera sensor, the Evo a 1/3.2 camera sensor (slightly larger). The Iphone's sensor is divided into 3.1M pixels providing a 1.75 pixel pitch (Large), the Evo's sensor is divided into 8M providing a 1.4 pixel pitch (small). What this means is that although the Evo has a larger sensor and more pixels, those pixels are less "sensitive" because they have less area to capture light. This correlates directly to why low light conditions would lag in the Evo. The Iphone has larger pixels, better capable at capturing more light per pixel. In good lighting the Evo should have superior pics. Since this same sensor is responsible for video, the same applies to video capture for each phone.

Now that was speaking from a purely hardware specs comparison of each sensor. The design of the sensors give the manufacturers of the phone a great deal of freedom over the operations of the sensors (metering, etc etc etc).... so the other part of that equations is going to be the software written to control the camera sensors.

If I were to describe the sensor in the Evo, I would call it a marketing trick that plays into the consumers line of logic that more MP = better pictures. The engineering behind it produces 8MP, but it hampers sensitivity of the sensor, which can introduce the blurring you guys see. This is very reminiscent of the Intel vs AMD clock speed wars, where AMD proved with the Athlon line of processors that you can compute more data with lower clock speeds.

Just to set up some of the fragile egos for the Iphone 4 release..... it will have the same size sensor as the Evo, with 5MP, giving it 1.75 pixel pitch..... theoretically producing better pics! It will also be better at taking wide angle photos due to the packaging and the lense.
 
Upvote 0

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones