Why is not running Gingerbread (2.3), it shows it running 2.2.1 which is still Froyo
I signed a one year agreement for my Inc since I am the type of person that wants the newest best fastest thing out. Honestly I am terribly underwhelmed by the lack of progress in Verizon's android lineup. Its like one step forward two steps back. Motorola's locked bootloaders give me no reason to touch any of their phones. HTC has barely improved the specs on their devices tablets included. Nvidia has quad core processors for phones now so double core is obselete and its not even out yet. 4g is only available in one of the cities in which I reside so the thunderbolt is kind of a flop for me. I never thought in a million years I would be saying this now but the incredible is still the best thing Verizon has to offer android wise and its not changing for awhile as it seems right now.
I signed a one year agreement for my Inc since I am the type of person that wants the newest best fastest thing out. Honestly I am terribly underwhelmed by the lack of progress in Verizon's android lineup. Its like one step forward two steps back. Motorola's locked bootloaders give me no reason to touch any of their phones. HTC has barely improved the specs on their devices tablets included. Nvidia has quad core processors for phones now so double core is obselete and its not even out yet. 4g is only available in one of the cities in which I reside so the thunderbolt is kind of a flop for me. I never thought in a million years I would be saying this now but the incredible is still the best thing Verizon has to offer android wise and its not changing for awhile as it seems right now.
Nvidia has quad core processors for phones now so double core is obselete and its not even out yet
Exactly. I am also willing to bet it wouldn't be on Verizon anyway.This phone has only been announced for Europe and Asia so don't get your hope up
Why wouldn't it be? Verizon has the original incredible, why wouldn't they have the new one?Exactly. I am also willing to bet it wouldn't be on Verizon anyway.
Nvidia has only officially announced the Tegra 2, which is dual-core. But, you said that Nvidia has quad-core processors out for phones NOW. I'm not one to call someone a liar.
So, please educate me. Name me ONE phone that is available today that is running an Nvidia quad-core processor. Just one is all I ask.
No phone has a quad core out I obviously know that. But they have been announced. Why buy a single core phone with almost the same generation chip in it that the Inc has running an obsolete version of android, in my eyes at least. 2.3 is out and the honeycomb gingerbread mashup should be coming soon. The Inc s is pretty much the same phone. And the Inc is already a great device. I'm not going to waste an upgrade for something that is obsolete before it is even released.
I'm not going to waste an upgrade for something that is obsolete before it is even released.
I take it, then, that you'll never be upgrading your phone again.
No phone has a quad core out I obviously know that. But they have been announced.
what a useless comment. he obviously is waiting for something a little more bleeding edge than the Inc S. Sure it's an improvement, but worth signing a 2 year contract for? I think not.
Additionally, performance is going to increase despite the same advertised clock speed.
That being said, we aren't going to see this phone in its current iteration on Verizon. Support for CDMA2000 1X, 1xEV-DO Rel 0/A/B is not one of the features of the MSM8255 chipset. As it stands, this is a GSM only phone.
I'm not due for an upgrade for another year or so. I've never understood why people pay such high fees just to upgrade their phones all the time.
We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.