• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

***Official Samsung Fascinate 2.2 Speculation Thread***

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think it is taking so long because Verizon don't really care if it is late. They would like to have it right but are not putting a ton of money into testing because the majority is happy with their phone. The people wanting 2.2 is just a drop in the bucket compared to how many out there own them. I see people everyday that don't know their phone is slow or glitchy. "It just runs that way" is what I was told today until I showed her my phone with voodoo SC 2.9...

Well and I was cheating a bit I had SPB Mobile shell running but she really wants an update now...
 
Upvote 0
... I see people everyday that don't know their phone is slow or glitchy. ...

It's all point of view I suppose. My Fascinate is stock 2.1 still and it is not slow or glitchy. It runs just fine. I want many things that Froyo offers, but I still think it is very very good as is now. It's all in one's point of view ...
 
Upvote 0
I think it's a combination of two things: first, ineptitude on the part of Samsung Mobile (which is, after all, not a software company); and second, Verizon's rigorous testing. The first is a bad thing, and the second is a good thing. But both mean delays.

There is plenty of evidence that Samsung has been trying. They've delivered multiple builds of Froyo to Verizon; unfortunately, it has taken them forever to do so, and the builds have been too buggy for Verizon to release. (This would also explain why Samsung is so tight-lipped about what's going on: they can't exactly admit that they keep screwing it up.)

I wish Samsung were better at this, but they're not. And given their apparent quality problems, I'm glad Verizon is testing the hell out of it.

What you say is likely partially true, but I did some more digging, and my inside source in Verizon (you can choose to believe whether it's legit or not, but I believe him/her) said "working for Verizon sucks now because of the internal changes that have been made in order to cater to Apple's demands." He also claims that the iPhone is the sole reason they got rid of or drastically reduced the "New every 2" program as well.

They still have AT&T by the balls as well. Anyone that wants to get an early upgrade (not eligible for a 2 year contract renewal) can get an iPhone for only $100 over the normal 2 year commitment price ($200 + $100 = $300). With any other phone you have to pay $200 on top of the normal 2 year commitment price (Atrix $200 + $200 = $400). Why should Apple users get special treatment when we all pay the same for phone and data plans?

Like I mentioned before. This is of course, Samsung's fault for being late on all the builds, and sending them to Verizon and other carriers in ridiculously imperfect states. But regardless of Verizon's rigorous testing, sweeping changes have had to be made company wide to both accommodate the current iPhone 4 and get ready for the new version coming soon. I think this is part of the reason why Verizon resisted for so long. But I don't believe the additional delays specific to Verizon now are solely because of their rigorous testing process. I still believe one of their overarching priorities, perhaps the most prominent one now, is the iPhone. I hope I'm wrong, but I see too much evidence. And not one person has yet been able to point out another smartphone that's received as much special treatment as the iPhone 4 did, even though it was a 6th months late release.
 
Upvote 0
What you say is likely partially true, but I did some more digging, and my inside source in Verizon (you can choose to believe whether it's legit or not, but I believe him/her) said "working for Verizon sucks now because of the internal changes that have been made in order to cater to Apple's demands." He also claims that the iPhone is the sole reason they got rid of or drastically reduced the "New every 2" program as well.

They still have AT&T by the balls as well. Anyone that wants to get an early upgrade (not eligible for a 2 year contract renewal) can get an iPhone for only $100 over the normal 2 year commitment price ($200 + $100 = $300). With any other phone you have to pay $200 on top of the normal 2 year commitment price (Atrix $200 + $200 = $400). Why should Apple users get special treatment when we all pay the same for phone and data plans?

I wouldn't sweat it too much, It's all technical sales numbers mumbo jumbo, without getting into too much detail and/or lingo, there are always ways around stuff like that, manufacturer rebate's, online rebates, subsidies, intro offers and stuff like that, that can be used to level the playing field.
 
Upvote 0
Seriously? The Mesmerize for US Cellular gets 2.2 today. Never again Samsung.

Android 2.2 Froyo for the Samsung Mesmerize now available from U.S. Cellular | Android Central



I'm willing to bet a large sum of money that Verizon shares a lot of if not an equal share of the blame as well. You call Verizon, they blame Samsung and tell you to contact them. You call Samsung, they blame Verizon and tell you to contact them. As usual, the customers get screwed because there is no accountability.
 
Upvote 0
hasnt this thread become rather silly because the ODIN file for stock FROYO
has been out for ages. I am running it on my Fascinate and have been for a while. I dont see how anyone who knows what FROYO is hasnt already updated their phones.



I wouldn't say so seeing how the thread is about the official version to be released over-the-air. Despite how easy it is, most people aren't comfortable with going that route and should not have to.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones