• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Do We Even Need Faster Phones?

phandroid

Admin News Bot
Apr 12, 2008
10,396
383
When the T-Mobile G1 launched back in 2008 with its 528MHz Qualcomm-made processor, we thought it was fast enough for our needs. I personally went a year and a half without the urge to switch phones and I’m sure there are many who are the same. I even know people still holding on to the [...]

More...
 
Phones performing better and better - this is the trend. This trend stimulates the market to bring better phones out, where nobody wants to buy a phone and be stuck with an old technology. Kind of two forces pushing each other further and further.
Seems to me a rivalry is starting with tablets and notebooks/netbooks.
 
Upvote 0
I see a real need for dual- and quad-core handsets if the future of computing dictates what Motorola has already started with the Atrix, i.e. the smartphone is the real personal computing device, truest to the sense of the word personal. The real PC of the future.

For all users, either business traveling or work or home, docking your personal smartphone will turn it into a full desktop/laptop computer, running full productivity software suites or full HD gaming. This is where we'll need dual- and quad core smartphones.
 
Upvote 0
Do we need faster phones right now? Not really. 1 GHz chips are going to be sufficient for most people. Obviously things are going to get better, but remember there's a difference between a NEED and a WANT. People WANT faster phones, but don't necessarily need them if they have a decent 1GHz chipset.

What we need is better, more advanced batteries. This is one technology that has been on the backburner for quite some time. Fix our weak batteries first, then work on my faster phone. I really don't see why we can't get the battery life of flip phones of the past if we were to just improve Android power management, kernel optimization, and increased capacity (while not increasing physical size) of batteries. That's what we need.
 
Upvote 0
The need arises when there come apps that require powerful processing. The perception of "faster" can be achieved in a different ways: faster processor or GPU, faster memory or I/O, acceleration, SW optimalization, OS tweaks, etc.

I agree.

But the "real life" focus is nearly always what's remarked about... such as watching the progress bar when going from page to page with the web browser on a hand held device, as opposed to not noticing anything at all in a quick transition on a PC or laptop with a fast processor (and/or highly efficient graphics chip).
 
Upvote 0
The focus is currently on making the phones faster and faster...history repeating itself (kinda sort of).

When I was a graduate student in computer engineering, the Pentium processor had just come out for personal computers and all the talk was about how to make microprocessors faster and faster and how great it was, etc. One of my professors put it all in focus with the statement that the software developers, at the time of the Pentium I, were just beginning to write really good software for the i486 processors--they hadn't even started writing code that tapped the potential of the Pentium.

Fast forward to the present...same story all over again. We are now seeing dual-core smartphones and starting to daydream about quad-core tables, etc. But where is the software? None of the current OS software is written for dual-core processors.

So, back to the topic of the thread...do we need faster phones. No...not until we have the software that can run them faster. As we used to say in grad school...how may clock cycles do you want to waste while waiting for the next fetch?
 
Upvote 0
>>"Do We Even Need Faster Phones? "
We dont need faster phones.

But we need more powerful energy efficienct computers using ARM cpus, connected computers, alternative OS to the established superpowers thats been designed around modern CPU's and input devices; making things smaller makes them use less energy (eg display, transport, materials to manufacture), its great that they're advancing so fast.
(you can call these things phones if you like.)

Despite cloud computing its healthy that people should want to keep or carry their own processing and data around, not to rely on centralized control.

>>"Perhaps we're at the dawn of an era of testing the boundaries of what the human eye (and brain) can perceive"

- I dont think we're anywhere near true VR (think of all the behaviour & interaction, not just the visuals)
 
Upvote 0
i'm no processor whiz in any way but i think that a single core in a smartphone is just fine for now (2011). maybe we can get dual core processors in phones once the software and battery life catches up.
so we can save dual cores for tablets since some people do more actual computing on tablets anyway.

just my two cents. correct me if i'm wrong. lol
 
Upvote 0
hi guys,
i think my htc desire is a very nice phone - but it still stuggles to perform as well as i would like - i put this mainly down to the small amount of free ram - but it could be the chip too i guess :/
plus you do need a lot of apps/widgets to get smartphone to actually be smart imo - so that obviously will impact its speed

im pretty sure when i upgrade, i will be going dual core - as long as it has decent ram

i find browsing can often be slower than i would like - but most people put this down to network strangling by the providers

but thats a way off yet - first job will be to root and rom the desire to see how that improves it

cheers
dan
 
Upvote 0
Android’s clear lack of UI responsiveness – even with 1GHz chipsets – compared to Apple’s devices bothers every Android user whether they like to admit it or not

I really wonder how the writer got a job writing about android phones, when he has no clue how to operate one. There is absolutely no lack of UI responsiveness on an EVO(which the writer owned). If there is you have a broken evo or are probably running an auto task killer.

I'd take slightly higher GPU than the EVO for games, but that's already out there. I would take 0 improvements in cell phone processing power for the next 5 years in a trade for perfect cell reception in providers coverage map areas, and much increased battery life.

The fastest phone in the world is useless without coverage and battery, 2 things that have basically been ignored by carriers and manufacturers for years now.

And f#$% 4g man. I should have had perfect 3g everywhere before you clowns even thought about rolling out 4g. Yay! I get my emails in .01 seconds now instead of .05, I'm dying happy - oh wait, I moved 5 feet to the left, crap, no emails.
 
Upvote 0
I have a galaxy s and the damn thing is still slow, and freezes, choppy page turns from home screen to home screen, or looking thru call history..pitiful really...so yea, we need more powerful phones to push thru these android apps and funny quirky UI's on the
handsets
The phone is powerful enough, but Samsung has messed-up with the slow I/O file system. It is fixable by rooting and lagfix.
 
Upvote 0

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones