• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

does atrix havea film over the glass?

was it real noticeable or did it blend very well and you had no idea it was on i mean did it look like there was nothing there but there was a film?
Yes, I couldn't see it at first, but I looked close and saw an edge, so I started picking at it and there was this beautiful screen. I put it back on though, no need to mess with it until it starts getting scuffed up and such.
 
Upvote 0
It's just the factory film. I just didn't notice it when I got my phone and actually placed another screen protector on top of that one.

It may well be the factory film, but I plan on plopping another screen protector on-top of it as soon as possible. I'm not sure why the factory put it on, but it does nothing, absolutely NOTHING, to inhibit fingerprints. So I mean to put a Steinheil Ultra-Fine screen protector on it in the near future, as the constant need to remove the fingerprints wastes a lot of time.

-Mike
 
Upvote 0
It may well be the factory film, but I plan on plopping another screen protector on-top of it as soon as possible. I'm not sure why the factory put it on, but it does nothing, absolutely NOTHING, to inhibit fingerprints. So I mean to put a Steinheil Ultra-Fine screen protector on it in the near future, as the constant need to remove the fingerprints wastes a lot of time.

-Mike
Own a Nexus One and the smudge thing will kill you (before you put on your screen protector). When I first got my Atrix, I was amazed at how much less it picks up smudges compared to my Nexus One. This was discussed before, but the Atrix has an anti smudge coating on it. I wonder if this 'coating' is the same as the 'film' that the OP notices?
 
Upvote 0
Own a Nexus One and the smudge thing will kill you (before you put on your screen protector). When I first got my Atrix, I was amazed at how much less it picks up smudges compared to my Nexus One. This was discussed before, but the Atrix has an anti smudge coating on it. I wonder if this 'coating' is the same as the 'film' that the OP notices?

The Nexus Prime/Nexus 3 (whatever they end up calling it) Will be my *next* phone, no two ways about it. An anti-fingerprint screen protector is the first order of business on all new phones. :)

-Mike
 
Upvote 0
I'm a bit of newbie when it comes to some of these things, but on the Atrix, with its Gorilla Glass and apparantly anti-fingerprint coating...is a flim still necessary?

If so, can anyone recommend one?

My point earlier was that fingerprints make me *crazy* so for me a screen protector was a necessity. I use Steinheil Ultra Fine Anti-Fingerprint on all of my android phones, and they work. Unless you're eating a pizza while you're using the phone, fingerprints are a thing of the past. You can find them either on Amazon or at their home - Atrix 4G - Motorola - Cell Phones

-Mike
 
Upvote 0
yep, but ur gonna get fingerprints on your protective screen film anyways, so whats the difference? is what im trying to say

unless you get the matte finish, but then your screen looks worse..

Yes, my screen protector has a matte finish. No, it does not show fingerprints. No it does not look worse.

-Mike
 
Upvote 0
A lot of products ship with a plastic film over the glass, or over other fancy trim parts. AFAIK there's nothing on the Atrix that is supposed to stay there as a Gorilla Glass Protector.

And while the Gorilla Glass is pretty good...I figured it was cheap protection to add an Otterbox that came with a screen protector. Basically invisible although the first one found a dust spec while I was applying it. I'm happier knowing that IF something in my pocket scratches it, or if someone with acrylic fingernails pecks at it, there's something easily replaceable on it.
 
Upvote 0
A lot of products ship with a plastic film over the glass, or over other fancy trim parts. AFAIK there's nothing on the Atrix that is supposed to stay there as a Gorilla Glass Protector.

And while the Gorilla Glass is pretty good...I figured it was cheap protection to add an Otterbox that came with a screen protector. Basically invisible although the first one found a dust spec while I was applying it. I'm happier knowing that IF something in my pocket scratches it, or if someone with acrylic fingernails pecks at it, there's something easily replaceable on it.


I agree. I had a LG Shine that has a glass screen, I think, and even though I was carful and carried it in a belt case, the screen still had scratches on it. So, regardless of the phone I have, I have put a screen protector on it. As you said, If a scratch appears, I just replace the screen protector. Instead of living with the scratch, replacing the screen or phone its self.
 
Upvote 0
...sand is nothing but small diamonds,..

Sometimes sand is ground coral (calcium minerals, soft), sometimes ground basalt (volcanic black sand, still soft) sometimes it is other things but the vast majority of sand is ground up quartz and if you see dark red gems in it, that's ground up garnet.

Quartz is pretty much the primary mineral in sand, so sand and glass are actually about the same hardness in most cases. Diamond dust as sand just isn't going to happen.

The problem is that most sand grains are rough from being broken down, not polished, and those rough points and edges gouge into things. If Gorilla Glass can't be scratched, in ten years we can all laugh at the money we spent on screen savers. Hey, remember rotary dial phones? No no, they didn't need screen savers either!
 
Upvote 0

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones