• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Will The HTC EVO 3D Be A One-Time Deal For HTC To Manufacture?

I would bet many of us don't even last the 2 years. Think about how many people came from the EVO to the 3D in only one year. I know I probably won't make it, so will have the next best thing to come out. I bought the 3D because it made me happy when I saw it and played with it in the store, and continues to do so, but I'll be chomping at the bit this time next year as well because there are sure to be some super duper phones coming out again.

I hate to admit it but I'm the same way. I loved my EVO 4G and here a year later I have this phone and love and am having a blast with it :D. I am thinking at the moment that I will keep this phone longer than a few months. I have a feeling though, gadget junkie I am, that I will be enticed by another device before then and end up with it. Lol my husband calls me a phone s-word. ;) He does end up with some great hand me downs as a result for someone who doesn't care nearly as much as I do about phone specs and making his phone do cool stuff.
 
Upvote 0
They're have been less confusion, they'd have avoided the worst of the shock over the economic slump, and they'd have given themselves time to develop the solutions to avoid that stupid active glasses tech altogether.
Sorry, I had to respond to this. I will always be a fan of Active over Passive. For Passive reduces resolution drastically. Active can also adapt better to different uses of 3D and movement. I feel my Active glasses make the glasses actually worth it for the 3D, with Passive I'd wonder why I have this expensive TV and I have to use these cheap glasses to use it.

Passive is only good if you have a lot of people viewing the 3D. For me that's not the case.


As for the rest of this thread, I agree with the iPhone statement. But regardless of that I think 3D is here to stay, especially as the technology advances and more people use it and find out that it's not as bad as they want to believe it is. Though I don't think it will get to a point where every phone does 3D, only a few will. The main hurdle with 3D is content, once more movies or even TV shows come out in 3D, then I can see it taking off more. The 3DS is also a huge boost for the 3D technology growing, Nintendo has been one to really push innovation.


After fully reading the rest of the posts on here I have a couple other things to say.

For WiMAX, it actually is not that much different than LTE. The industry is jumping on LTE which is why Sprint is going towards it, but I don't think it's like HD-DVD and Blu-Ray where one would become obsolete. WiMAX is sorta a long-range Wi-Fi connection that I feel many places including campuses will take up. The great thing about WiMAX is that it give complete free access to the internet where LTE can be controlled by the companies running it to add limitations. I've always been one for Net Neutrality. I used to be on the LTE bandwagon because of it's speeds over LTE, but that's because of more people being on it and the fact it is currently capped at 5 MHz width capacity which will like double, maybe quadruple which should raise WiMAX speeds up to 30Mb/s. Not to mention WiMAX 2 around the corner sporting real-world speeds of up to 100Mb/s. There just needs to be more WiMAX towers, and that only needs time and more investment from Sprint and other backers of WiMAX.

As for eye strain I can see it in some people. My father for one can't see 3D at all because he has a bad eye. My gf hates seeing stereoscopics, one because she hates new technology, and also she says it hurts her eyes. She's threatened to break up with me because I was pushing her to watch something in 3D on my 3DTV. So she'll never enjoy my 3D Blu-Ray movies, my 3D PS3 games, she finds the 3D on my 3VO to be neat but she's not that into it, and she has said she'll only play 3DS games in 2D once I get one. Some people are just like that, and some people just can't help it. But I think most people if they give it an honest try will love it.

As for future proof technology, I don't think you can get much better than the 3VO. I'm always after something that is going to last me. I got my computer 5 years ago and it is still going strong because I made sure it had a dual core processor, a dedicated graphics card, and 2GB of RAM. Sure it's showing it's age now but it's held up really nicely over the years. My TV is a Sony 1080P LED 3DTV, and the only thing I've felt I've missed out since getting it is the feature on the newer Sony models where they can listen to music on a show and tell you Shazam/Soundhound style what it is, which is cool but not a big deal. I chose the PS3 over the 360 not only because I liked my PS2 and enjoy Sony games, but also because of Blu-Ray because I knew it would win in the HD Media format war. The reason I'm saying all this is because I want to get the point out that I'm really cautious when buying new technology, and I find the 3VO a phone I can enjoy for the next 2+ years. Sure they might have higher resolution in the future but who needs it, they might have quad processors but how fast do you need it to go, especially since you can overclock to processor on the 3VO to 1.5-1.8, and graphics might get better with Tegra 3 and OMAP 4-5 chips but I only play the most casual of games on my phone to pass the time, if I want to play games that's what I have my handheld systems from Nintendo and Sony for. And as I stated above WiMAX is only going to improve so you can't get much faster, you just might see phones that handle the larger amount of data being transferred better, and by then you should be up for a upgrade on your phone. As for 3D sticking around, as already stated by others as more content is made available the more 3D will be accepted and people will shy away from a product if it doesn't allow 3D. So I'm sure in a couple years there will be yet another amazing phone with stereoscopic display. I'm just hoping that phone hasa rotating dual camera system, so I can take 3D photos and video in landscape and portrait.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EarlyMon
Upvote 0
I hate to admit it but I'm the same way. I loved my EVO 4G and here a year later I have this phone and love and am having a blast with it :D. I am thinking at the moment that I will keep this phone longer than a few months. I have a feeling though, gadget junkie I am, that I will be enticed by another device before then and end up with it. Lol my husband calls me a phone s-word. ;) He does end up with some great hand me downs as a result for someone who doesn't care nearly as much as I do about phone specs and making his phone do cool stuff.

I have no intentions on upgrading to anything else in the near or distant future (5 years). I have invested far too much time and money upgrading this device to exactly where I want it. All of this done in a very short amount of time. So for me, to upgrade just for the next latest and greatest gadget just goes to show how little respect I had for the 3DVO.

It's s great conversational piece, and friends and coworkers that have never seen the technology seem to get a real kick out of seeing themselves in 3D when I take their pictures during happy hour. One thing I've noticed in a "happy hour" setting is that when people lay their cell phones on the tables in front of them, I can't help but to realize how superior my 3DVO seemed, compared to the iphones, Blackberries, and other smart devices out there. As people fumbled through their devices, checking messages, making calls, and showing apps to other people, I found that my 3DVO has a bigger screen, the live wallpapers really get noticed, the speed of amazes them, the functionality, and image/video clarity all seem lightyears ahead, compared to what everyone else prided themselves on with their respective devices.

So with all that said, I have very little motivation to upgrade in the near future. Should HTC continue with the next generation of 3DVO with a quad core, then I might consider it. But if it came down to me getting that, then I really see no need to upgrade to another smart device from then on out. The dual core is already fast enough as it is for me. Having double that might be overkill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarrieK
Upvote 0
Well Prof, at least for now I don't forsee jumping to another device. I am still learning new things about this phone and I am having a great time with it. I use the mhl a lot. Can take my phone to a friend's house and voila, instant entertainment! I also enjoy experimenting with 3D video and photography. At this point it would take a lot for me to move on to something else.
 
Upvote 0
Well Prof, at least for now I don't forsee jumping to another device. I am still learning new things about this phone and I am having a great time with it. I use the mhl a lot. Can take my phone to a friend's house and voila, instant entertainment! I also enjoy experimenting with 3D video and photography. At this point it would take a lot for me to move on to something else.

Glad to hear that you and your husband are enjoying the device. And as you've eluded to with the entertainment factor, it certainly does pay for itself when my wife is shopping and the kids are restless. I have quite a few movies and games uploaded on it, so I have more than enough to entertain both myself and anyone else that can tolerate looking at such a small device for well over 24 hours straight of continuous gazing... But I seriously doubt anyone could do that, let alone my 4000mah battery be able to handle that amount of straight usage.
 
Upvote 0
Glad to hear that you and your husband are enjoying the device. And as you've eluded to with the entertainment factor, it certainly does pay for itself when my wife is shopping and the kids are restless. I have quite a few movies and games uploaded on it, so I have more than enough to entertain both myself and anyone else that can tolerate looking at such a small device for well over 24 hours straight of continuous gazing... But I seriously doubt anyone could do that, let alone my 4000mah battery be able to handle that amount of straight usage.

While it is a good diversion for little ones (or big ones for that matter. ;)) to view media on the phone itself, using mhl has been awesome. The adapter charges while hooked up to the tv, and you can not only view picture slide shows and home video but stream YouTube videos, movies, and play games with surprisingly good quality. This thing is amazing!
 
Upvote 0
While it is a good diversion for little ones (or big ones for that matter. ;)) to view media on the phone itself, using mhl has been awesome. The adapter charges while hooked up to the tv, and you can not only view picture slide shows and home video but stream YouTube videos, movies, and play games with surprisingly good quality. This thing is amazing!

In your experience (or any other user here) with viewing 3D content from the phone to your 3D television, what's the clarity of pre-loaded or downloaded 3D movies like?

That's one of the top two reasons why I went with this device. Compared to buying both a dedicated 3D camera and a 3D video camera, the 3DVO was far more cost effective than buying both of those devices. Next on my list is to build a powerful PC to accomodate 3D Blu-ray viewing, burning, and converting to digital files for my 3DVO. And hopefully in a couple of years, our glasses-less technology will be perfected for larger sized displays for home entwrtainment usage.
 
Upvote 0
In your experience (or any other user here) with viewing 3D content from the phone to your 3D television, what's the clarity of pre-loaded or downloaded 3D movies like?

That's one of the top two reasons why I went with this device. Compared to buying both a dedicated 3D camera and a 3D video camera, the 3DVO was far more cost effective than buying both of those devices. Next on my list is to build a powerful PC to accomodate 3D Blu-ray viewing, burning, and converting to digital files for my 3DVO. And hopefully in a couple of years, our glasses-less technology will be perfected for larger sized displays for home entwrtainment usage.

My tv is not a 3D tv but we can still view movies and pictures taken in 3D just fine. I haven't experimented with converting yet but I have seen posts by people who have.
 
Upvote 0
There's already plenty of 3D adult content on the market right now. But I don't think the lack of it is the reason why we haven't seen a big boom in sales of 3D merchandise. From what I've gathered on a variety of electronic sites over recent years is that the utilization of 3D glasses for 3D televisions seems to be the main problem that plagues retailers and manufactures, as well as the buyers motivation to invest in that sort of product. But now with the introduction of the glassesless Nintendo 3DS, and the HTC EVO 3D, it's apparent that more and more people are warming up to the lenticular/stereoscopic technology. And with HTC's EVO 3D being the number one phone in America right now, it just goes to show that the glassesless technology is exactly what people prefer, in order to fully embrace the whole 3D movement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EarlyMon
Upvote 0
I'm extremely satisfied with my EVO 3D purchase. I hope to see Sprint move to LTE in two years when I am due for an upgrade and that is when I will be updating my phone. I can't believe they'll dump more money into expanding WiMax and quite frankly, when you're around wireless internet all day I have no need for super fast internet speeds. Even if it is a one time deal, it is a deal that has pleased many.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EarlyMon
Upvote 0
I wonder how the decision from Sony to not subsidize those 3D glasses for movie theatres will affect the 3D industry as a whole, and whether or not it'll affect future production of 3D movies from other studios.

From what I understand, Great Brittain already has a program in place to where people can purchase and bring their own 3D glasses to the movies. And if people forget to bring them along to the 3D movie they planned on seeing, they can buy another set through consession stands. I hope that America adopts that policy as well, as it'll create jobs, and help the economy. However, I don't know how that'll affect ticket costs, and if that added "3D experience" surcharge will be dropped.

Bottom line, I hope that Sony's decision and lack of involvement in providing theatres with 3D glasses doesn't cause a ripple effect in the film industry and slowly diminish the 3D experience... Hell, we just got started only a couple of years ago.
 
Upvote 0
Depends on:

How well does the Evo3D sell?

Is there some other cost effective way for HTC to distinguish the Evo line in 2012 over competing phones by Apple, Samsung, and Motorola?

How much market penetration does 3D get in other entertainment sectors (Theaters, computers, TV's, etc etc)?
 
Upvote 0
3D is a gimmick. the market will dictate if it makes it into other devices. that said, i dont think the next version of the EVO will have a 3D camera system. this one will be around for a while. there wont be any new breakthrough technology in 3D in the next year. further, the next version of the evo is already being drawn up. so .. yeah.. i think its a one time deal if i had to pick a side...

Everything we need to create stunning 3D images is available. Producing 3D for the web is easy, and producing 3D hard copy is easy as well. With nothing more than a high quality printer and a few supplies, 3d prints are available. All it will take is public acceptance. We are not reinventing the wheel and we are not talking about advanced technology or high costs.

The problem is the same today as it was twenty, thirty, forty years ago: the public does not seem to embrace stereo photography. They never have. Even during its hey-day, 3D was only used by a small percentage of people.

Someone mentioned if Apple did it, it would gain immediate acceptance. Perhaps this is true. I know exactly how to design a 3D printer that would be capable of incredible color and sharpness. The problem is building a commercial version. The required tech is as old as the hills and engineering is required, but it is simple to do.

All I know is there is a huge market for printed 3D images; architects, industrial designers, the porn industry, and more could help push 3D to greater heights.
 
Upvote 0
I wonder how the decision from Sony to not subsidize those 3D glasses for movie theatres will affect the 3D industry as a whole, and whether or not it'll affect future production of 3D movies from other studios.

From what I understand, Great Brittain already has a program in place to where people can purchase and bring their own 3D glasses to the movies. And if people forget to bring them along to the 3D movie they planned on seeing, they can buy another set through consession stands. I hope that America adopts that policy as well, as it'll create jobs, and help the economy. However, I don't know how that'll affect ticket costs, and if that added "3D experience" surcharge will be dropped.

Bottom line, I hope that Sony's decision and lack of involvement in providing theatres with 3D glasses doesn't cause a ripple effect in the film industry and slowly diminish the 3D experience... Hell, we just got started only a couple of years ago.

If you are talking about polarized viewers, there are at least fifteen companies making them. They are dirt cheap, too. Always have been inexpensive in bulk.
 
Upvote 0
There's already plenty of 3D adult content on the market right now. But I don't think the lack of it is the reason why we haven't seen a big boom in sales of 3D merchandise. From what I've gathered on a variety of electronic sites over recent years is that the utilization of 3D glasses for 3D televisions seems to be the main problem that plagues retailers and manufactures, as well as the buyers motivation to invest in that sort of product. But now with the introduction of the glassesless Nintendo 3DS, and the HTC EVO 3D, it's apparent that more and more people are warming up to the lenticular/stereoscopic technology. And with HTC's EVO 3D being the number one phone in America right now, it just goes to show that the glassesless technology is exactly what people prefer, in order to fully embrace the whole 3D movement.

Seen tons of 3D films over the years. My first was a reprinted version of Arch Obler's 'Bwana Devil.' If the glasses are correctly made and they match the projection system; not to mention, if the projectionist knows his stuff, people forget they are wearing glasses.

When something is not right, eyeballs suffer. Also, for any of you that have seen 'Commin' At Ya' you will understand another big issue: too much crap flying off the screen. It is something almost every 3D film suffers from and it can be quite tiring. People go to 3D movies because they expect what they get and a bad experience drives viewers away.

Lenticular is almost the only choice for glass less stereo viewing. It suffers from a quality problem compared to a polarized system. The Evo 3D must use a lenticular system because polarized systems are impractical.
 
Upvote 0
If you are talking about polarized viewers, there are at least fifteen companies making them. They are dirt cheap, too. Always have been inexpensive in bulk.

Let's hope that this is the begining of change in the industry, and that there is a standardized way for movie patrons to view the 3D content of their choice without being penalized by the makers and suppliers of these movies.
 
Upvote 0
Does anyone know if there's been any public data that suggests that the sales of the HTC EVO 3D (or other 3D smartphones) is on the rise or decline? My guess is that with the holidays approaching, we might see a spike in sales, which will only help support the demand for 3D devices on the market... And that in return might also prompt HTC to come out with a 3.0 version of our devices with the 3D technology, furthering its development and possibly refining the "kinks" we've had to bear... One can only hope.
 
Upvote 0
Ok I am due for an upgrade next month and am looking at the EVO LTE. Mu question is if I give up my EVO 3D what do I do with the hundreds of 3D pictures I have taken? Personaly I love the 3D but the EVO 4G that I handed down to my wife is about shot so she is pushing me to take the upgrade.
I have read all the complaints about the 3D pictures and video but I think they are awesome. I was hoping there would be a 3DLTE but since most people saw it as a gimmick I kinda doubt it.
 
Upvote 0
I think you're right... if Apple introduced 3D in their next phone it would be a moot point. Suddenly it would be better than the invention of the proverbial sliced bread ;) I enjoy the 3D aspect so I hope it sticks around. I also agree with Marc though, no reason for the next EVO to have 3D since that feature is the one touted for this phone and is its main selling point even though it is an excellent phone without the 3D.

My guess is if Apple were to add 3D, it would eclipse anything currently being done.

My problem with the EVO is it creates terrible 3D and the users expect too much. they do not know how to photograph in 3D and they think every picture they take will be spectacular. There are ways to create spectacular 3D, but it requires work on the part of the viewer.

3D is old hat and we know how to create bloody good 3D images. My thinking 3D was added in an effort to bring something new to cell phones rather than addressing a real "need." Just marketing of something even the uses of the EVO do not understand.
 
Upvote 0

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones