So, apparently someone got hold of an S3 and did back to back camera shots with a HOX
Michael's Album: GALAXY III v One X [Photos]
Full size here:
Photo Comparison Samsung Galaxy III and HTC One X
My first thought was the S3 looks horrendous, washed out colours, not sharp, flare from lighting... but on second look its better at some pictures - the roses in the hallway and the apples are sharper than the HOX and less saturated. The image looking down a road with cars parked either side the HOX white balance is off (cold) and slightly underexposed.
Some shots show camera shake and/or loss of focus. Both of these could be user error (My HTC Desire can be a little awkward sometimes).
Note there is no EXIF data on any of these images, someone removed it.
Its also odd that Samsung let someone wander off with an unreleased phone that from what I read is still on pre-production software. I looked on a map and found the outside locations are up to a mile from Earls Court, but all reviews etc that I've seen no-one got allowed to be out of the building with the phone.
In the outside pictures there are no cars or people, which would indicate early morning ? I wouldn't expect that area of London to be that quiet in daylight hours.
The HOX uses the same sensor as the SG2, I don't know about the lens, but at any rate the S3 having a worse lens than the S2 or HOX doesn't really make sense.
What do we think guys ? I posted here because until I actually see some confirmation I'm treating this as rumour.
Edit: also just found this that has a few detail pictures from an S3 vs S2 which would be more what I'd expect :
xda-developers - View Single Post - Samsung Disappoints & HTC Steals The Show!