There is a good chance that you still had water residue from installation that simply froze under the protectorJust wondering, has anybody seen their screen protector go bad while being outside in a cold? Spent about 5min outside today using my Note2 while it was just about 20degC; now I see some swirly pattern under my screen protector. Hardly noticeable with a screen on, but when it's off I can see it really well. Almost like that sticky substance on a screen side got all funky, and its permanent since I have been inside where its warm for a few hours now and it hasn't changed. Of course, I'm just accounting this due to a cheap material on my $0.50 eBay screen protector (which so far has been great, up until being in the cold).
Anybody else seen this, with either cheapo or brand/quality screen protectors? Its hard to describe, but it does look like a swirly oily pattern all over the screen protector on the side facing the glass display of the phone.
Just wondering, has anybody seen their screen protector go bad while being outside in a cold? Spent about 5min outside today using my Note2 while it was just about 20degC; now I see some swirly pattern under my screen protector. Hardly noticeable with a screen on, but when it's off I can see it really well. Almost like that sticky substance on a screen side got all funky, and its permanent since I have been inside where its warm for a few hours now and it hasn't changed. Of course, I'm just accounting this due to a cheap material on my $0.50 eBay screen protector (which so far has been great, up until being in the cold).
Anybody else seen this, with either cheapo or brand/quality screen protectors? Its hard to describe, but it does look like a swirly oily pattern all over the screen protector on the side facing the glass display of the phone.
I still use applicator liquid even on dry ones just because it doesn't usually hurt anything but helps with alignment a ton, im sure other do too.Water residue? Most of these are dry applications. Just an adhesive on the protector that sticks to the screen. No water or liquid needed. Maybe to clean the screen before application, but that's it. I actually prefer dry applications.
I still use applicator liquid even on dry ones just because it doesn't usually hurt anything but helps with alignment a ton, im sure other do too.
The one i posted above was the very first dry apply protector ive done thats gone on perfect with no liquid.
My spigen olephobics finally showed up today, let them warm up from the mailbox, then built up enough courage to put one on. After I got the thing lined up enough for my tastes I'm pretty happy with it.
Can you guys with Spigen olephobics screen protector PLEASE confirm for me if you see a weird rainbow/swirly effect under the fluorescent lights? I just googled this problem and found it to be common with a lot of different (cheap) screen protectors, like I have now. Just would like to confirm if it still exists (probably not) with Spigen one.
I have Spigen Ultra Oleophobic. I have no such problems like the ones you describe. It looks fine under fluorescent lighting at work. At home I have 2 fluorescent tubes, CFCs and LED bulbs. No incandescent. Still displays like naked screen. No odd effects with it.
I don't own a Defender. I posted a pic of my Note and Note 2 with Otterbox Commuter cases on them earlier.One more question, if decide to splurge on Otterbox Defender (still considering), would there be an issue with Spigen screen protector and plastic screen cover? I could have swear watching someone's YT review where they claimed response delay due to interference between screen protector and Defender's screen cover.
Just got this today from MobC
MobC Smasung Galaxy Note 2/N7100 Screen Protector HD Film - Fine Crystal[2-Pack] | eBay
Stuck it on, nice cut, leaves about a 3mm gap around the edge cause of the curved surface of the screen.
Comes supplied with all you need to fit and remove any dust particles.
Stuck on straight perfectly, no bubbles no dust, looks perfect at the moment.
Feels nice, not as nice as the bare screen, but good enough for a screen sticker.
Notice a tiny bit of rainbowing reflection, but only when the screen is off!
I'll report back in a few weeks time if my opinion changes however
I have Spigen Ultra Oleophobic. I have no such problems like the ones you describe. It looks fine under fluorescent lighting at work. At home I have 2 fluorescent tubes, CFCs and LED bulbs. No incandescent. Still displays like naked screen. No odd effects with it.
Yep. I'm looking at mine right now under fluorescent lights at work and it looks perfect.
Just so you guys can see what I'm talking about, here is a shot of my phone screen at work under fluorescent lights. Once you step outside under natural light or at home under regular light bulbs - it looks as good as Spigen I actually found a lot of people complaining on-line about similar swirly-rainbow effects under fluorescent lights, even with some other premium screen protectors (although, not Spigen). Like I mentioned before, I gave one more shot with eBay order (they usually refund you back if it doesn't work as expected), and once that experiment fails - will order Spigen.
[/QUOTE]
I've got the Spigen Ultra [B]Nano[/B] screen protector for the Galaxy S3 installed on my phone and I can see a similar adhesion pattern/effect under certain light with the screen off sometimes, though its not a worry of mine.
You probably won't see this pattern when you buy the Spigen Ultra screen protector for your Note 2, as the material is thicker and more rigid than their Ultra [B]Nano[/B] line. My point here is that the adhesion pattern effects companies no matter what their perceived value/quality is or where it was purchased from. Spigen is not inherently immune to issues. It has to do with a product's attributes and install and not the companies name or make up. And reminder that there is no
Wow...I'm suffering from information overload on this thread. I've got a Otterbox Commuter and a Samsung protective + case to decide between the two to protect my precious new Note 2. I had a generic screen protector I got from Costco with accessory pack and although I had to trim it, it did its job, protect my screen up until it took a dive in bathtub.
I'm confused at the difference between the screens that are Crystal or Oleophopic, whats the difference? I want a screen protector that doesn't inhibit the touch screens ability to be used and isn't so thick that I can feel it on the edge of my fingers and covers as much of the screen as possible so the Otterbox case covers the edges to keep it from getting dirt.
I don't abuse my phones, I treat them gingerly but I will be putting it into my pocket alot and using it when my hands may not be entirely clean. I don't care if I have to wipe down the screen frequently, I'm used to that, its a small price to pay to protect my $700 screen IMO and I don't want one that distorts the screen/colors like those gawd awful ZAGG protectors do.
I wanna order my protector tomorrow it will be here this week so I can put it on my replacement Note 2 due my first one with stuck pixels and my Commuter Otterbox will be here
So should I do the MobC for my needs?
Or go with the Spigen? I Don't like that it doesn't protect the lenses according to a users pictures of the product
Anyone tried the ISmooth? Seems like the reviews on it are better all around
We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.