• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Root Tried this on CM9 and am noticing a real speed boost

I have found that the on/off button in this app is unreliable. During testing, I have found the button showing "off" but the app was actually running. Alternatively I have found the button showing "on" but System Tuner showing it as Stopped.

Edit: after seeing app as stopped, and turning it back on, verified in System Tuner, then posting this message, went back to System tuner and seeder was again stopped.

Seems to need a bug fix
 
Upvote 0
I disagree. I'm not seeing any obvious differences in CPU clockspeed times.

If this is indeed true, the increased clockspeed times are so miniscule that they are not noticeable on the charts. Smartass 2 gov, btw.

This would be easy to test, if say raising your minimum clockspeed to whatever elevated level you think is causing the effect, or perhaps using performance governor (I wouldn't suggest that one as you will definitely see an extreme decrease in battery life) and just uninstall the apk.

I want to know if the app has to be running continually, or does it just have to be run once at boot (to make the change it makes) and then that change sticks until reboot.
 
Upvote 0
I will try it again next time I use cm9 maybe it will work on that better

That's what I like about this group. We help out and have many data pionts. So it seems that this might get worked in to CM9. There was a part on how to intergrate it. Maaaaaybe next week, if g60 doesn't do it first, I can slap together a "test" build with this in it.

Gotta set the calender reminders.
 
Upvote 0
I can't say its not a placebo effect, but things are running well for me in CM9 using it. I don't see the frequent key board lag I used to have, apps open and close in a snappy manner, and in general it feels smoother like it was freshly booted, but all the time. My battery seems to be worse off, but I can't say that wasn't happening prior to using this because its been pretty bad lately, but I'm not using any particular battery saving methods.
 
Upvote 0
I disagree. I'm not seeing any obvious differences in CPU clockspeed times.

If this is indeed true, the increased clockspeed times are so miniscule that they are not noticeable on the charts. Smartass 2 gov, btw.

This would be easy to test, if say raising your minimum clockspeed to whatever elevated level you think is causing the effect, or perhaps using performance governor (I wouldn't suggest that one as you will definitely see an extreme decrease in battery life) and just uninstall the apk.

I want to know if the app has to be running continually, or does it just have to be run once at boot (to make the change it makes) and then that change sticks until reboot.

Read the xda post
 
Upvote 0
Read the xda post

Already did.

I never claimed this did anything, I'm just saying that if it DOES anything at all, it definitely hasn't raised my clockspeed... And I can prove that much anyway. Would posting a chart of my clockspeed distribution with and without the apk installed, over a 8 hour period prove it to you?

Quality of random data is a whole different issue, but I have seen no apparent effects, either positive or negative.
 
Upvote 0
Read the post sweener put in Fix '90%' of lags in android (Needs Root) : Android

From what it is saying all this is doing is firing off a randomizer at 1 second intervals. Yes that will hold your governor's cpu speed threshold to the upper end. The ranomizer itself is going to use CPU cycles to run so what would make you think the CPU governor wouldn't be affected?

Pffft

Um, because I have been logging my CPU speed/time distribution, using system tuner, instead of taking someone elses word for it.

Why don't you you post your personal results instead of quoting others? There's also a ton of posts to the contrary, some that say they have lowered their speeds, while seeing performance increases not seen by raising the speed without the app.

There's just too many opposing results being posted to draw any sort of consensus without doing your own testing. I did. That was my results.
As always, ymmv, and I won't argue with whatever results you see in your setup. Just stating what I have personally seen in mine.:rolleyes:
 
Upvote 0

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones