• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Samsung s2 better than evo v ???

I would be so pissed if I bought an s2 for $329 a week ago.
I think the s2 is better in some regards, but I find it odd that the sale is only on the white model, and only until tomorrow.

I know me tooo I would also be pissed off if I ordered one for 329..I actually ordered it for today cuz I did want the s2 and I saved up $100 LOL from its original price $329 ......$230.99 isn't bad and I would of order it in white any ways...i remember when evo v came out first day n i paid $300!!:(
 
Upvote 0
Yes but the biggest problem is the lack of development for the Virgin mobile galaxy s2. Hopefully soon more developers will purchase and start hacking for them. :)

I think as of right now developers won't buy this phone cuz of the price but as soon as price goes down they will get it .
 
Upvote 0
The Virgin Mobile site is only showing it for $279.00 this morning for the white model. I guess I missed the opportunity. It's only $50 off now. Is the Samsung really a better or faster phone than the EVO V 4G?

Seems like it was a one day sale. Now, as you said, it's $50 off, which is good for several weeks (sometime in March). On paper, the processors are the same (dual core 1.2GHz). The screen is a tad larger, and is AMOLED, but the qHD screen of the EVO is sharper (higher resolution). The Samsung also comes with more memory. Luckily for the S2, the battery is removable else it wouldn't even be a consideration for many. I also like that Swype is included with the stock S2, not so with the EVO.

If 3D means nothing to you, the 8MP camera of the S2 is likely better than the 5MP camera of the EVO.

I can't speak of any other differences as I lack hands-on experience with the S2. When I made my decision, the EVO was less than half the price of the S2. If they were the same price, or within $25, I could have gotten it instead. Even at the $230 price it was for a day, I couldn't justify the extra cost. My whole plan for switching to VM was to save money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EazySteve
Upvote 0
The phones don't perform a lot differently, so it really comes down to things like the camera or screen size/resolution. I would be happy with a S2 had I started with it, but it's not an upgrade. One thing I can say is that on the S2 camera, the color green is way over saturated. If you have an EVO, best to hold on to it until at least May or until the next VM Flagship phones are announced. I would hate to pay several hundred dollars for an S2 and have the S3 or EVO LTE drop a few months later.
 
Upvote 0
i have both phones my s2 is boost. they are both good pieces of hardware i love the feel of the evo in my hand a good solid feel. both phones are great performers the cameras are not a selling point for me. both take good pics to me. either one is a good choice. there is a lot of development for the s2 already done. dont limit yourself to vm development
 
Upvote 0
The camera of the s2 wasn't a selling point to me ether in fact it was the size of the screen. I remember when evo v came out I bought it because of the 3D n 4g , but honestly I would hardly even use 3D, I do get 4g in my area so that was the only big user difference from my previous phone (triumph). I mean I hate to leave my evo but I do want a big screen phone with good performance.. oh and I also bought it cuz of the one day sale for $230 I thought it was good time to buy it...:)
 
Upvote 0
The camera of the s2 wasn't a selling point to me ether in fact it was the size of the screen. I remember when evo v came out I bought it because of the 3D n 4g , but honestly I would hardly even use 3D, I do get 4g in my area so that was the only big user difference from my previous phone (triumph). I mean I hate to leave my evo but I do want a big screen phone with good performance.. oh and I also bought it cuz of the one day sale for $230 I thought it was good time to buy it...:)

I posted the sale price down in the Virgin Mobile section. I was surprised no one commented on it. Lowest price it has been since they started selling it. I would of jumped on it had I recently not joined VM and got my EVO.
 
Upvote 0
i have both phones my s2 is boost. they are both good pieces of hardware i love the feel of the evo in my hand a good solid feel. both phones are great performers the cameras are not a selling point for me. both take good pics to me. either one is a good choice. there is a lot of development for the s2 already done. dont limit yourself to vm development

Well of course but they don't work properly at all (roms etc). The data and 4G breaks...
 
Upvote 0
Is that a good or bad thing?

I assume good if you own an evo v. The galaxy s2 has a slightly larger screen (4.52 vs 4.3) and it has a lower resolution (800X480 vs 960X540). If the screens were the same size, it would be less noticeable though you could still see a difference. The s2 still has a really nice screen.

Edit

Does AMOLED have backlit black? If not, then the s2 likely produces a better black. Also, is it more energy efficient?
 
Upvote 0
Does AMOLED have backlit black? If not, then the s2 likely produces a better black. Also, is it more energy efficient?
OLED screens do not have a backlight. They are basically thousands of tiny compounds that act like LEDs, so the pixels produce their own light. As a result, colors are not as washed out and blacks are truly black (because to show black, that part of the screen just turns off). Some people think they look over-saturated, which would just be personal preference I guess. I used to have a Zune HD with an OLED screen. It was low-res, but the colors were amazing.

Energy efficiency - Yes and no. The energy use of an OLED is totally dependent on what's on the screen. Mostly black images use a lot less power than an LCD, but mostly white images actually use a little more. Some people think this was one of the reasons behind the color scheme changes in Gingerbread, as the Nexus One and Nexus S both use OLED screens. So pick a dark wallpaper :p

More notes: OLED screens are subject to burn-in, more so than plasma. They also tend to wear out faster, and not evenly. The compound used to create blue light degrades faster than the others, so as an OLED screen ages, the color balance will go funny.

Oh, and if you're wondering, the "AM" in "AMOLED" stands for "Active Matrix." It basically refers to the way the pixels are arranged.

So: Pros are fantastic colors and potential battery savings. Cons are burn-in susceptibility and shorter life.

Speaking of screens and Samsung: This may be just me, but TouchWiz is even worse than HTC Sense. At least HTC Sense tries to make things look a little shiny. TouchWiz looks like a cartoon.

Only slightly related rant:
I hate how TV manufacturers are calling some TVs "LED TVs," because this implies that the screen is using LEDs - they aren't. The backlight on those TVs are LEDs, but the screen itself is still good-'ol LCD. They do produce a much better picture than older flat screens (which used fluorescent backlights), but they really should be called "LED-backlit LCD TV." But I guess that many acronyms in one place gave the marketing department a seizure.
 
Upvote 0
Only slightly related rant:
I hate how TV manufacturers are calling some TVs "LED TVs," because this implies that the screen is using LEDs - they aren't. The backlight on those TVs are LEDs, but the screen itself is still good-'ol LCD. They do produce a much better picture than older flat screens (which used fluorescent backlights), but they really should be called "LED-backlit LCD TV." But I guess that many acronyms in one place gave the marketing department a seizure.
That's why they put "LED/LCD Combo" on the box now.
 
Upvote 0
Having the evo v n the s2 on my hands I did notice some difference between the two
* evo v screen has more resolution n looks more bright than s2. But s2 screen isnt bad ether cant complain about it.
* s2 is much lighter than evo v.
* camera is a big difference. s2 pictures look more sharp, well it is 8mp vs. 5mp
* battery life on S2 is way better than evo v.
* quadrant score: the S2 performed way faster than evo v. I do have my evo v rooted running cm10.1 overclocked to 1.5 and it still fell behind the line... In my opinion s2 performance is grater than evo v..

Evo v still a good phone tho :)
 
Upvote 0
The service for me would be the kicker. VM in my area is horrible, but Boost is nice, though I don't know why.
I'm still thinking about making a switch though because of the screen size and the camera. The lack of developement is a big turn off, as I have a great more respect for this phone since I rooted it.
But what I'm thinking about is waiting to see what happens with the S3 32gig version now that Verizon has said it is at the end of its life with them. That might be worth the wait.
 
Upvote 0

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones