kewl, but I see more of a need for root for vv4/5.
agreed
Upvote
0
kewl, but I see more of a need for root for vv4/5.
kewl, but I see more of a need for root for vv4/5.
Someone who has another daily use phone should try this!
I'd be down, but I can't afford to brick my daily driver.
Thanks for your work on this Sammy. I understand that this has CWM, but does that mean it has root as well?
Someone who has another daily use phone should try this!
I'd be down, but I can't afford to brick my daily driver.
Thanks for your work on this Sammy. I understand that this has CWM, but does that mean it has root as well?
agreed
This is an alternative implementation of the su binary for Superuser on Android.
This implementation is compatible with the original su binary but differs in
the following:
o it doesn't use the am command for notifying Superuser.
The old C++ code crafting intent body is used instead. The code supports
Android versions up to ICS inclusive.
o it sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the value copied from the parent process
on ICS or higher.
o it is linked dynamically.
o it tracks both su.db and permissions.sqlite databases when checking
whether the caller is allowed to call su. Thus, all Superuser versions are
supported.
The implementation is compatible with Superuser 3.1.3 or less.
You already do. As far as I can tell. The su binary should still work and so should the superuser.apk (I've never seen an su binary not work, if it's installed). What we didn't have was a way to get root access (an exploit) to get the binaries in the right folders and with the right permissions.
If my file that injected cwm inside the bin works, and it flashes ok. That means you don't *need* an exploit to get those files in there anymore. just boot into cwm (this has root access built in), take the root zip file and flash it.
I didn't exploit things like other files do, I just completely bypassed their security methods by modifying data during transport from LG -> your phone. The oldschool swapparoo lol
i was going to do it but someone said not even the cab vv3 cab bring me back so im on the fence
Yea, I'm saying if this fully flashes and it perma-bricks, you are permanently bricked!
So people who have this phone as daily, DO NOT TRY.
To have this brick it has to be hard brick hence the hard as in hardware brick which means no coming back at least not with our tech yet soft brick is a software brick which can in most cases be recovered from
I'm saying this does have the potential to hard brick. I know the difference between hard brick and soft brick. Please listen to my warnings, you CAN hard brick if this isn't done correctly, it may just soft brick but it also has the potential to hard brick. Understood?
If you really think I'm wrong, go ahead and flash away. You don't have to listen to what I'm saying if you don't want to
But let's be clear here:
I am not responsible to what you do to your device!
I'm not gonna try due the fact I don't even know the first step to flash it
I hear ya. Hopefully someone steps up that has this phone just sitting in a drawer or doesn't need it steps up. Honorary astronauts. I just build the ships to get you there man.
In theory after flashing, you can boot into CWM, then flash the zip that installs root and superuser.apk (i don't have that zip but i know it's in the forum here somewhere, if u have it please link). Since we have CWM at this point, rooting is trivial. If this works then I can do this for pretty much any new firmware that shows up.
Aaaalllright.... decided to just go for it and test it out. A few days back the download from Sammyz wasn't working for me, decided to install Google Chrome and besides from it being a pretty awesome browser, my download finally completed So i made a backup of my phone real quick (just in case i was actually lucky enough to not get hard bricked), shut down the phone, put it in Emergency Mode, and began with it. So i skipped down to step 11 in the Unbrick/Unroot/Update LG Connect guide since the file was already a KDZ file and wasnt necessary to convert and well.... no luck =/ i get an Update Error guys. I attached a pic and a Log of what happened, but yeah... blah
Oh and since the third file of the four total possible combinations was the only one in KDZ form, i wasn't able to try the others.
On the bright side, phone is still running i was sweating bullets through out this whole thing.... you guys owe me.... like a lot... haha
Thanks for being brave and trying it out. It turned out I was right about being able to recover via flash. It's their 'recovery' mode after all If just anything could perma-brick a device, they would have to dump a bunch of of development devices and it would increase their development costs significantly so I was very confident it wouldn't be the case. If your phone was a pc, this would be the equivalent of flashing a bad ghost image, then recovering by flashing a good ghost image.
It would be different if say maybe you flashed a bad baseband from a different device that took similar commands to operate which could set frequencies that a radio isn't supposed to be able to use for example, but that's not what we're doing here.
Were you able to boot the device afterwards? even a cwm backup might be useful if it managed to flash at least that partition + CWM
Can you please pack some of the other offsets into kdz's. It's why I made 4 different files.
Can I ask why we're risking a patio block for a rooted VV5? I'd hate to see somebody kill their phone only to have a 4G fix for CM10 come out the next day LOL. ABSOLUTELY no disrespect or offense intended Kanaida, it just seems like a really big risk for a stock Gingerbread ROM that, IMO is not the best one out of the bunch to begin with.
If we could find some more dev help with Connect's CM10, I have a Connect sitting in my drawer that I would happily loan to a dev and/or maybe collect some donation money from the Connect community for the help, IF we can find somebody that is. I kinda hinted around to BobZhome in the Motion forum, he either didn't see my post or is not interested LOL.... Not gonna PM him either, bad feeling about doing that for some reason
Thanks for being brave and trying it out. It turned out I was right about being able to recover via flash. It's their 'recovery' mode after all If just anything could perma-brick a device, they would have to dump a bunch of of development devices and it would increase their development costs significantly so I was very confident it wouldn't be the case. If your phone was a pc, this would be the equivalent of flashing a bad ghost image, then recovering by flashing a good ghost image.
We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.