Is that actually true or is it that it's being made easier for developers to port apps to Windows phone? (or am I getting confused with something else[good chance of that])
Our candy crush app on Windows Phone was actually an IOS app that was recompiled to work on Windows Phone. We actually didn't know this until Build in April when they revealed it. We all thought it was just a native windows phone app.
More details here
http://www.theverge.com/2015/4/29/8511439/microsoft-windows-10-android-ios-apps-bridges
I am not going to get too technical...as that is above my pay grade lol.
Look, it's not bias, it's really simple -
You hit a point rapidly where Microsoft and Apple products exist in the format that they do strictly to lock you into their platform only.
The reference to Kool Aid is a common meme and existed as a phrase before the Internet. It's a reference to the Jonestown Massacre where Jim Jones got his followers to drink poisoned Kool Aid, having convinced them that they'd go to heaven. Blacks and whites were killed in that tragedy. I see no point to you bringing up your skin color. Last I checked, it didn't matter in personal computing or in being misinformed about the past.
If you believe that any closed-end solution is a good idea, whether from Microsoft, Apple, Google, or Samsung is a good idea, then you're drinking the Kool Aid.
If the Windows phone floats your boat, knock yourself out, enjoy it.
But if you think it's better because it integrates better with Windows on a pc, then you're just a Kool Aid victim - and that's a fact no matter how often you repeat the word bias.
Microsoft used to be one of the rulers in smartphones. They're down to about a 2% market share, they make more money off of Android than they do with the Windows phone - and they hate it.
Rather than making more Android money by expanding their apps into Android and making them work properly - something that they've said repeatedly that they're going to do - they've done the exact opposite.
I'm glad you're on "Team Windows" as you put it - I hope that's fun for you.
I'm not on a team. I use what works and I vote with my wallet.
I have no desire to change to an inferior operating system with limited device support just for one function and if a buddy asks if he has alternatives, I'll help him find some.
If you want to argue with that, you're on your way to thin ice.
What makes you think that you're going to want to use Windows on your desktop in 5 years?
And i'd rather not use an inferior OS that is outdated by the time I get phone and is highly dependent on having top of the line specs because it can barely run on lower end hardware. Because you know after 7 years, Android still hasn't figured out how to fully optimize its OS.
and I certainly don't want an OS that has a god awful skin to make it 'appealing' or 'unique' instead of OEMs actually bringing innovation in other places.
It was a joke about being black and kool-aid...it wasn't meant to be serious.
I seriously doubt Microsoft hates the fact they make more money off Android than Windows phone.
1. If I am getting paid regardless why would I care? Sure it'd be great if it was my own product but I am getting paid.
2. They hate google...and google hates the fact Microsoft or as the anti-Microsoft fans like to say M$ is making money off their OS/OEMs...so them making money off android is worse for google and their OEMs than it is for Microsoft.
So that argument is a bit flawed there.
I haven't been following Android as much as I used to in the Pre-ICS days, when I actually cared about Android/Google and its products....I used to be a regular here.
But if you notice, Android's openness in the early days of 2008 still exists in theory but Google is starting to crack down a bit more on their OS and close things off that used to be open. There are several articles about this I've read and making it increasingly difficult for OEMs who wish to try to dual boot Android and Windows on their product to do so....or risk being thrown out of the alliance or whatever.
Sure Android is open...but the Google Experience itself isn't.
More importantly, it is not a fanboy for someone to choose a closed source product over opensource. Not everyone cares about flashing the latest rom or having to update their phones to the latest version because as per usual Android is usually 1 or 2 versions behind.
I voted with my wallet and I chose an OS that it doesn't matter if I own a Nokia(now Microsoft) lumia or go to Samsung or HTC or LG Windows Phone, my experience is the same and I don't have to worry about compromising. I don't have to worry about crappy experience.
I chose the closed source because my Lumia Windows Phone comes with bloatware yes....but I can...wait for it...uninstall it.
My mother brought an HTC android phone with a ton of crap on it she doesn't even use. You can disable it...but I cant remove it.
I chose the closed source OS because I don't care about Open vs Closed....because I don't feel 'trapped' in the ecosystem because I chose to go to there.
Why? Because the experience is cohesive. It's Unified and the OS works across all devices the way it should...regardless if I have a low spec'd phone or a top of the line. It just works.
It's why Apple is still has the mindshare that Samsung is desperately trying to get and keeps copying Apple's moves.
It's why google is now trying to copy Microsoft.
Coincidentally, Microsoft is the more open one instead of Google...all of their services on ALL platforms because Microsoft, unlike Google, is not afraid of competition and nowadays is far more open than anything Google is doing presently.
Google abandoned the do no evil mentality ears ago and it is merely an idea Android fans hold on to nowadays and that's fine.