The Droid Turbo 2 is a fantastic phone with tons of cool features. Unfortunately, the camera is mid-range. There's no action shot mode and it's really difficult to get a sharp picture as soon as objects or people start moving. By comparison, the camera on the Note 5 is in a totally different league and has many free downloadable camera modes while being totally customizable, including an excellent sports mode. The auto mode shows blurriness with fast movement in the Note 5, the sports mode doesn't. I wish Motorola had thought this through. Yes, you can take 10 pictures in 2 seconds, but they're all blurry if the subject is moving.
I had read the DxOMark review enthusiastically (84/100 compared to the Note's 86/100), and this was a selling point for me. Baloney! Now I find suspicious that articles about the Droid Turbo 2 camera test by DxOMark started popping up everywhere a week before the official presentation of the phone when DxOMark is often pretty slow to publish tests of some of the other popular phones. The Note 5 has the same camera module as the Galaxy S6 Edge (and S6) which gets an 86/100.
My wife has the Note 5, so I know what I'm talking about. I challenge anybody to show me even the slightest shred of real-life-use evidence that the Turbo 2 warrants an 84% when the Note 5 gets an 86%. The Turbo 2 takes great outdoor pictures with no moving subjects and plenty of sunlight. It also has pretty good low light capabilities, again when nothing's moving.
The front flash also helps a lot for really good selfies (the Note 5 lacks a front-facing flash).
Despite this, I prefer my Turbo 2 to the Note 5 for various reasons: better battery, original UI and software, actually slightly faster, durability out of this world, faster charging, sd card, cheaper...) The list goes on. The S-Pen does nothing for me.