• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Is there a "Siri" for my Samsung Galaxy S5??

mikahdad

Lurker
Mar 29, 2016
3
0
Okay--

I'm aware of the S-note app but it's a piece of crap as far as I'm concerned. Has Samsung or independent
provider to them come up with an app that is close to Siri? My contract for the S5 is up in a few months
and I may switch to iPhone because of the usefulness of this one particular app. Help.

mikahdad
 
There's Jeannie, an early competitor to Siri. I still have it in the back forty of my apps, but never had much use for it.

Get Jeannie, one of the best voice assistants that has several million downloads today!
Voice Search of the future, you will no longer need to memorize special keywords or phrases, simply speak into your smartphone and voice actions will automatically respond to what you need. Talk to her, she is quite a character.​
 
Upvote 0
The Google terminology is a little weird

"Google voice" is a free service that gives you a phone number where you can make and receive calls. Also very flexible call screening, forwarding, visual voicemail etc.

"Assistant" - if you are referring to interaction after saying ok Google...It's something different than Google voice. What is this interactive assistant properly called? I don't really know. Some people call it Google now, but I associate that with cards. Some people call it "Google voice commands", which is more descriptive.... The extra word "command" helps distinguish it from "Google voice". I just call it "ok Google"...everyone knows what I mean
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: lunatic59
Upvote 0
My contract for the S5 is up in a few months
and I may switch to iPhone because of the usefulness of this one particular app.
I've only had very limited exposure to Siri through friends and acquaintances and while all of them find Siri to be fun and useful to a limited extent, that was the issue -- while being smoothly folded into iOS it's limitation is a lack of extensive integration with your info and its functionality. Google Now on the other hand, takes your info and makes it a significant part of now it works. An example being a notification about being late for an appointment is based on an entry in your Google Calendar and traffic conditions it pulls from Google Maps/Waze.

http://www.cultofmac.com/330162/siri-vs-google-now-who-wins-the-ai-cat-fight/
 
Upvote 0
Well, Jeannie, took my name, asked me how I feel, and said "thanks"

I then asked "where is Ocala, Florida" and that is where every thing stopped.

google voice would have popped up a map and showed me Ocala, Florida and asked if I want to go there now? do I need directions?

not impressed.

Jeannie is just a chat-bot, and a very limited one as well I found. Which is frankly about as much use as Talking Tom for controlling your phone, asking for directions, ordering things. LOL
 
Upvote 0
ok, I didn't understand that "assistant" is a completely different app, not by google. So my last post completely missed the boat and probably created confusion. I should separate three things.

  1. "google voice" - phone service not related to this thread.
  2. "assistant" - 3rd party app - I know nothing about it
  3. "ok google" (google voice commands) - built in to most android phones as part of the google app without need for 3rd party app. It's what I use and most android users use.
How does "ok google" compare to the 3rd party apps like "assistant" and the others mentioned? While I haven't tried any of the 3rd party apps mentioned I certainly suspect "ok google" is far preferable for most people on most counts:
  • powerful.
    • ok google is powerful... it taps directly into google's service.
  • convenience
    • ok google is convenient. As mentioned, there are a variety of ways to trigger it easily depending on phone/setup. I trigger ok google simply by saying ok google to my watch (Moto 360) or on my phone (while at Nova launcher screen).
  • resources
    • ok google does not seem to be a resource hog in spite of the convenient activation. I don't know about the other apps, but if they implement some kind of always-listening or often-listening feature for easy activation, it's very easy for them to use a ton of juice if not well managed.
  • privacy/permissions.
    • Google needs a lot of permissions, but that doesn't concern me because Google is a well-known $500 billion company whose corporate value is heavily dependent on user trust. So it is simply not in their best interest to jeopardize all that by misusing my personal info in any way that would be detrimental to me. In contrast I don't know anything about these other developers. I checked "assistant" app permissions and it asks for: calendar, contacts, location, microphone, phone, sms, storage.... WOW!!! While the permissions themselves don't suggest anything sinister about the app (these permissions are required for the app to do it's job), I certainly have to ask who is this dev that people are willing to trust with all these permissions that literally include the potential to listen to their everything they do. Personally I'd have to spend a lot of time researching any dev before granting them those sweeping permissions.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
I agree with anyone who says use ok google.

Its brilliant. Its built right into the phone.

Im not a samsung fan because i find gapps dont work as they should in comparison to how they work on devices that run asop roms or nexus devices but really i think youd be hard pressed to find a voice assistant type app that can beat it.

The google app is very powerful. If you play with the settings you can trigger ok google even with the screen off
 
Upvote 0

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones