Attention Potential Android Users: choosing the right smartphone for you

Thanks a ton!
I guess this thread was what's been missing here, for me there are some things clear now! Still, would be interesting to hear other people's opinions on it!

 

Good write-up, with lots of details and justification for the OP's subjective opinions. I would still encourage people to research these manufacturers and come to your own conclusions. I can find several points here that I don't agree with; doesn't mean I'm right and OP is wrong; it's just that one size doesn't fit all.

A quickie example: I'm on the small side, 5'8" small frame. I love 4.3" screens. Can't type worth a damn on wife's iPhone's 3.5" screen.

Go Red Sox.

 

I agree with you, there are a few things i do agree with and don't.

Such as the OP said Samsung typically has plastic build quality. Build quality is only what the user makes of it. Also you say that Samsung has been slow when it comes to updating, but really that's not the case at all. The SGS was updated quite soon after it's release in Europe it was only the US carriers fault for having phones like the Epic, Vibrant, Captivate, and Fascinate having untimely updates. Although there is only one Samsung device i can think of that Samsung has had problems updating. (Behold II)

Other than those couple of things i completely agree with you, thanks for the post.

 

FYI, my HTC Desire Z has HTC Sense running on it, but on the back, it has "with Google" written on it.

Also, you did not mention anything about Sony Ericsson phones. Do you have any experience with their phones?

In any case, this is a very informative post.

 

Good thread. However, you probably should include a part about GingerBlur, which is totally revamped and fantastic.

 

Damn it, I was in the process of typing up a long reply on locked / encrypted bootloaders, Android OS versions... then I hit the back key to correct a typo and it went back to the previous page and wiped away my reply...

Basically, Samsung / LG are the most developer friendly, HTC and Motorola are using locked / encrypted bootloaders to prevent custome software (ROMs) from being installed. (UPDATE: Apparently HTC now has decided to have unlocked bootloaders, which means Motorola is the sole phone company with encrypted bootloader, so stay away from Motorola).

The average consumer should care because if a carrier / manufacturer abandons a phone, the consumer can still update the phone with the latest Android software if the bootloader is not encrypted.

My Samsung Moment is less than 2 years old, and it's pretty much dead in the water in terms of development. It went from Android 1.6 to 2.1, and the future looks grim for updates. Thanks the the after-market community, I was able to install Android 2.2 on it to make some fixes to the laggy stock software, and improve user experience. So this may not be a big deal initially, but it will be a huge deal once you own the phone for a while.

Removing carrier bloat is also another good reason. In Sprint's latest ROMs there's something called CarrierIQ, that basically tracks everything you do with your phone. By using after-market ROMs, the CarrierIQ is stripped away so your privacy is protected. Another good reason for using after-market ROMs.

So I currently lean towards Samsung / LG / HTC at the moment, and shy away from Motorola.

Also the different flavors of Android can be confusing. Here's my take on it:
Android 1.6 (Donut) - ancient version of Android. Stay away from it if you can.
Android 2.1 (Eclair) - bare bones minimum version of Android. Move up to a later version if you can.
Android 2.2 (Froyo) - decent / modern Android OS, can do many things, such as App to SD card.
Android 2.3 (Gingerbread) - very polished Android experience, latest version. Use this if you possibly can.
Android 3.0 (Honeycomb) - for tablets only, not relevant for phones.
You always want the latest Android OS on your phone if possible, as it can enable some great features. For example you can run Netflix only on Android 2.3, and Google talk with video only works on 2.3.

 

Well written. my mom's thinking about getting a smartphone and i let her read this to educate herself a bit on Android. thanks

 

The real issue tends to be that people assume that needs/wants are universal. They're not. That's why "best" is so subjective. Any words like that are subjective. If you find yourself using any of these words:

• best
• worth
• cheap
• expensive
• good
• nice
• useless
• useful
• pointless
• ...and so on. There are too many for me to list them all but hopefully you get the idea.

...then keep in mind that they're highly subjective words. Spend some time qualifying exactly why you have that opinion. What makes you think that one option might be better than the other may not be perceived the same to another or may not carry the same weight. If we all had the same needs/wants then we'd all be using the same device.

In the end, it all boils down to determining your particular needs/wants, prioritizing them and seeing how the options suit you. It's really no different from buying anything else. I think people just get overwhelmed by specs and don't understand how to translate specs into what does or doesn't work for them. If you can't narrow down the choices based on your requirement sthen of course you'll be overwhelmed by all the options out there.

And don't overlook assessing devices in person. Many people have strong preferences for various physical characteristics, whether it's the feel of the particular physical keyboard, the size of the device, the image quality if the screen, the form factor of the device, the weight of the device, etc.

If you're trying to write a guide for everyone to refer to you really should try to strip your subjective preferences from the guide and write it in a general way for people to make their own decisions.

These are all your preference. Another person could rank these OEM's differently. You really don't need to tell people about who has better specs or not. That can change and shoppers can compare specs for themselves. It's very straightforward to compare two numbers and determine the larger one.

Build quality is also a highly subjective point. I've lost count of the times that I have not agreed with another person on perceived build quality. For a general guide, you should just leave build quality as one of those items for the shopper to assess in person rather than dictate your preferences.

Again, your preference. UI preference is something that each person needs to assess on his/her own. Pointing out exactly why you prefer a particular UI can help but if you're trying to write a general guide you should instruct the individual to try out all the options.

I haven't liked any of the UI's out there so HTC isn't a leader IMO. The next person may strongly prefer Sense. Yet another person may strongly prefer another OEM's UI. Don't project your preferences if you're trying to write a general guide.

Yet another matter of personal preference. Full retail isn't the only option for replacement. There are used devices, refurb/CLNR, etc. There are those that don't consider insurance on such items worthwhile at all. Some just stash aside some cash in case of loss.

I'd suggest mentioning that the carrier isn't the only source of insurance either. Many people seem to assume that's the only option when there are 3rd party providers including insurance companies that the shopper may already use for homeowner's and other insurance.

Not exactly. You might want to read up more on the different network techs before trying to author a guide. There is a difference in how the 2 split up the available bandwidth but it has nothing to do with multiple towers and everything to do with time division versus code division.

Also, keep in mind that not all Android users are in the US. US carriers aren't the only ones out there. In the end, most consumers don't care about GSM versus CDMA. It's real world coverage that matters most and people need to assess this on their own. Coverage maps are a starting point but they're not totally accurate. Every carrier gives you a time to cancel without ETF. Spend that time assessing coverage where you need it.

International travelers will probably want a device that supports international GSM bands. Most GSM devices already do this. There are options for CDMA but the shopper needs to look at CDMA/GSM hybrid devices which are generally labeled as "world phones".

Shoppers might also have a preference for GSM versus CDMA based on sound quality. I've seen people that prefer GSM and people that prefer CDMA. This is another thing that each shopper needs to evaluate on an individual basis.


In general, it doesn't hurt to test drive anything that you're considering.

 

Very good thread.

My opinion, you may want to stress that it is probably most important to figure out which carrier is best for the individual before even looking at the other stuff.... because the carrier, and service that the customer gets signal/data wise is going to have a long term impact on their experience, more so that the phone will. What good is having a bad ass phone if the service in the persons area isn't good?

 

Ohhhh Yeeeeea!

 

Let me chat that idea to the team - I agree, this is good stuff.

 

There is a need for a site that lets the consumer select desired features and filter all results, from all available phones, sort them by price or release date, etc. No one site does all this. You can sort of partially do it through various sellers, but only from their limited stock. And you can't filter by operating system.

At least if such a site exists I'm not aware of it.

When I was recently phone shopping, I wanted:

GSM Quad-Band
Unlocked (for use in U.S. or overseas)
Not Motorola (dislike Motoblur)
Android 2.2 or above (required for purchased app)
'Slide-out or at least tactile' Qwerty keyboard (phone for mother who can't do virtual kbd)

It would have been nice to go to a site, plug all that in and filter, from all phones made in the last 3 years, for example, including pending releases.

Just posting this to nudge someone who might want to start such a website. If I had the knowledge I'd do it myself.

 

Good post, I want to add a point about hardware.
There are many phones around with different Hardware and different Prices. I saw many people with expensive phones with massive hardware that they really don't use and they don't need. We should understand that sometimes there is no advantage to get a phone just for is appearance (anyway you know the size of your wallet xD).
If you are a basic user (sms, calls) - up to 150$ maybe ok, or you can try other "no Android" phones.
If you are a normal user(sms, calls, wifi, some photos and games, usefull apps) - up to 350 its good. Most of users are in this section.
If you are extreme user you probably know the correct phone for you .
The whole point is that some reading about needs/hardware before buying can save you some money.

 

Hello:

Like many others here, I think this is a very good and useful thread. I particularly liked the way the OP kept some of the more subjective elements in the forefront while discussing how to choose a phone (or for that matter any kind of device).

What I want to do here is to post about (1) how I came to choose my phone (2) how I use it now, and (3) what my experience has taught me about the next phone I am going to choose.

I find many parallels between what the OP has posted and my own experience. Long post though! So, you are forewarned.

How I chose my phone?

I came to Android from a Nokia/ Symbian combine. I loved my Nokia E series phone, especially the physical KB. But the phone was getting a bit awkward because it was locking up repeatedly for some reason or the other.

I had been reading about Android and so I took the opportunity to buy a low-end Android unit - Samsung G5560 (Fit) to try it out. I now wish I would have bought the Ace, but whatever. When I bought it, Froyo was on as the OS. My reasons for buying the phone were (1) I did not want to spend too much money on what I considered to be an experiment since I had never used Android (I have previously used Palm and WinMob 6.5) and (2) I wanted a phone for only a year before I upgraded. This was to be stop-gap arrangement for the time being. (3) It was well within my budget.

Originally when I bought the phone (around June 2011), I did not have a 3G connection. Though I did have GPRS. But having got the phone, I signed up for the 3G services and have not looked back since.

My impressions of the phone were and remains positive. I found it to be light, easy to handle and sleek. Android was a revelation. To begin with since my stuff revolves around Gmail, setting up was hassle free. Though the extent of my intimacy with Google was and remains a bit worrying.

The phone did hang sometimes, but I attributed that to the low-end specs. Recently, however, Gingerbread was pushed out to the phone and it has worked very well since. Battery life has improved, among other things.

How I use my phone?

Obviously for calls and messages. But I have found that my earlier interest in surfing the web on the phone has died. The screen on my particular phone is too small. I also use my phone as a music player (I use the doubleTwist app from the Market).

Having once tasted Android, I looked around for a tablet and since Android tabs and the iPad were the only choice, I went with an Android Tab (Acer A500). I have never used Apple stuff. And, anyways, they are too expensive for me, though I do appreciate the designs of their hardware.

I use my tab for everything except for making and receiving calls. To do that, I tether the phone to the tab using the MobileAP feature and it works brilliantly (though, at the cost of battery life). This is one feature that I really like and use a lot. Any future phone MUST have this feature and it should be dead-easy to set up.

So, essentially, my "smart phone" (low-end though it may be) is basically a phone, media player and access point to tether my laptop (Win7) and the tablet. In a pinch I can activate the other features, but I keep it off to conserve battery.

What about my next phone?

If the above is what I am going to use a phone for, then what I need - and this specific only to me - are the following:

Good battery life (quite essential)
Wif + BT capable (non-negotiable)
Sync-ability with tab and laptop via Google/ Gmail (or it could be MS Live Services too)
Seamless tethering (non-negotiable)
Efficient messaging system (I am willing to try out any new but reasonable solutions)
Something that complements and augments the tab (quite essential)

Now, the question remains: Will the next phone-tab combo be an Android affair or a Win8 affair?

Nokia hardware (phone + (possibly) tab) + Win integration (hopefully with tab-centric Office apps) sounds good since I also use Office extensively. Very tempting! Would involve migrating to the MS eco-system, but that's not too much of a hassle. Also, though I am assuming the update schemes would be more stable than Android, the Nokia-MS combine may get a bit claustrophobic (and expensive).

OTOH, I still feel that Android is and will remain more exciting - both in terms of OS and apps and hardware though Nokia's quality will remain hard to beat. Potentially, more VFM to be found on the Android road.

In the Android scheme of things, one thing that I will do when I buy my next phone (end of 2012) is that I am going to root the Samsung Galaxy Fit (before it is too late - it may already be too late) in a way that optimizes it as a media player with consequent battery advantages. I may want to use it as a dedicated media player thus freeing up a function for my next phone. Trade-off? I am adding another device when the objective is to be mobile and to benefit from the convergence of not only information but also hardware.

The main point is that I can do any of the above in either eco-system. So, I need to only look for the appropriate hardware that can support these activities.

This is probably how I am going to go about choosing my next phone.

Again, sorry for the long post!

 

Phone Finder and Compare

The "full filter" will allow you to filter on everything except whether it's unlocked.

 

This is a super-important point. In my case, Verizon & AT&T offer newer, cooler phones, but they also have the worst coverage where I live (rural, small town area). So it really boils down to C-Spire or C-Spire (aka CellularSouth), and in their case, they have a great network but tend to lag technologically. For example, I have a choice of a Samsung Galaxy S or an iPhone 4S. They say "4G coming soon," but based on their roll-out of 3G a few years ago, the process is likely to be delayed, implemented on a bizarre schedule. Their "unlimited" plan is throttled data, too. But the option is crappy phone service once I wander more than 5 miles off the main highway...

 

i like that the OP says that specs don't matter. this is very true. i don't like how the next line says there is no best, just different. perhaps there is not best, but there is definitely better, not just different.

example - 2 phones might have the same specs but, one phone is able to run a game that you want to play smoothly but the other one doesn't. so you see exactly how specs don't matter in this example, but you also see how the real world outcomes DO matter, and make one phone better than another phone, not just different.

if one phone gets longer battery than another phone, it is better, regardless of specs. if one phone gets better signal than another phone, it is better, regardless of specs. and so on and so forth. this is why whenever i make decisions, i look to reviews from experts and informed consumers, not specs. it's all about performance. and some perform better than others. and you can't tell from specs.