1. Check out our companion app, Forums for Android! Download from Google Play

Root bakesnack vs fresh 3.2

Discussion in 'Android Devices' started by d1reyad, Sep 4, 2010.

  1. d1reyad

    d1reyad Active Member
    Thread Starter
    15

    Aug 21, 2010
    37
    0
    15
    which one of these rom do you guys thing is better on battery life bakesnack or the new fresh 3.2?
     

    Advertisement

  2. uminchu

    uminchu Well-Known Member
    93

    Oct 14, 2009
    525
    134
    93
    Depends on the kernel. The last BakedSnack I ran was 1.5 with (I think) kernel 5. Good ROM, everything works, faster than Fresh32, average battery life. There are newer bakedSnacks since then that I haven't tried yet.

    Fresh 3200/stock kernel isn't as fast, but IMO is smoother with better battery life. It's faster with netarchy419, and battery is only slightly decreased, still longer than BakedSnack15/k5.
     
  3. exBBuser

    exBBuser Well-Known Member
    93

    Jun 6, 2010
    921
    123
    93
    Miami,FL
    Even with netarchys Kernal is not that fast.
     
  4. uminchu

    uminchu Well-Known Member
    93

    Oct 14, 2009
    525
    134
    93
    I agree.
     
  5. v01rider

    v01rider Well-Known Member
    113

  6. exBBuser

    exBBuser Well-Known Member
    93

    Jun 6, 2010
    921
    123
    93
    Miami,FL
  7. v01rider

    v01rider Well-Known Member
    113

    hmm good to know.
     
  8. exBBuser

    exBBuser Well-Known Member
    93

    Jun 6, 2010
    921
    123
    93
    Miami,FL
    That's @1.15 performance.[​IMG]
     
  9. Hazy

    Hazy Well-Known Member
    36

    Aug 10, 2010
    82
    6
    36
    I just read up on it a lil bit... is it worth giving it a try? with snap 8.2 im getting good result as of the overall performance of the system, smoothness speed, etc. (not to mention 1950 quadrant scores) Battery life is not that great but it 'might' get me through the day....
    So since u have become my unofficial reference for snap, lol... how does 7.5 run? i dont really care much about score but actual system performance and battery life
     
  10. exBBuser

    exBBuser Well-Known Member
    93

    Jun 6, 2010
    921
    123
    93
    Miami,FL
    Coming from 8.2 I must say is not as fast since its based on .32 but it is really smooth and performs as expected. Battery is better than 8.2 IMO. My only issue with 8.2 was battery life and it was getting on my nerves so until get my 3500mah battery 8.2 is out of the picture for me.

    When it comes to quadrant score 7.5 is really close to 8.2,I just edited my previous post with a snap shot of my benchmark scores performance governor @1.15 with conservative at the same speed I get close to 1700 sometimes a lil bit further.
     
Tags:

Share This Page

Loading...