I have an Optimus V. I like it pretty well with exception to reception that I get at work. I switched from Net10 where I could always get reasonable reception at my office, which admittedly is in a small town in between Sprint cell towers. I knew going in that I might not have reception indoors. I'm curious, though, does the Triumph get better reception on average than the Optimus V? I can *ALMOST* get phone calls OK in my office, but they drop almost every time. Text/MMS works well enough. If I could get from -105 on average up to -95 I think I'd be in good enough shape. At home everything is fine; I get around -90 to -85 dBm indoors (and better outdoors) and everything works as well as can be expected. So what kind of difference are you seeing between the Optimus V and the Triumph, for those that upgraded (exact numbers depend on location, of course)? Obviously, if reception is not as good as with the Optimus V I won't upgrade, but if it's better in a fashion that's statistically significant, I'll give it a go.