1. Are you ready for the Galaxy S20? Here is everything we know so far!

Boxwave vs. Steinheil anti-fingerprint screen protectors

Discussion in 'Android Accessories' started by justjerry, Feb 24, 2011.


Boxwave vs. Steinheil anti-fingerprint screen protectors

  1. Boxwave

    1 vote(s)
  2. Steinheil

    3 vote(s)
  3. Other (please describe in a post)

    0 vote(s)
  1. justjerry

    justjerry Well-Known Member
    Thread Starter

    I've been searching the forum and reading about both of these anti-fingerprint screen protectors. From what I gather so far, the Steinheil is good but makes the screen clarity suffer and almost makes the screen look fuzzy. A couple of people said they had tried out all sorts of anti-glare/anti-fingerprint protectors and found Boxwave to be excellent.

    So - which one do you have (if you have one)? What do you like/dislike about it?

    I really don't like fingerprints, but I really don't like a matte screen that mutes the colors and sharpness of the screen on my EVO. So I'm looking for the anti-fingerprint screen protector that let's most of the sharpness and detail of the screen come through while eliminating most fingerprints.


    EDIT: If you chose Boxwave please indicate if you have the ClearTouch Crystal or the ClearTouch Anti-Glare.


  2. ssick92

    ssick92 Android Enthusiast

    Oops, I voted for Boxwave because of their anti-glare screen protector, however it does have a matte finish for dulling out the reflection of the sun. So I kinda voted for the wrong one, but any Boxwave screen protector is very well made, and a very high quality screen protector. Thus, I stand by my vote.
  3. justjerry

    justjerry Well-Known Member
    Thread Starter

    Ok so which one did you or do you have? the ClearTouch Anti-Glare or the ClearTouch Crystal? And how did it work as far as anti-fingerprints?

Share This Page