Problem:
If Israel invading Palestine and creating a country there is an issue (ethical/morally, etc), then no country in the world is ethically/morally justified. Since that is the crux of Malcolm X's argument (and yours, by extension)...
Where do you draw the line, and how do you not make it arbitrary?
Are you perhaps referring to say, the colonization of the United States? Guess what, the folks that were here (let's call them "native americans") did fight back. They lost. Your argument appears to be that the same thing is occuring elsewhere, and that's a problem.
If Israel invading Palestine and creating a country there is an issue (ethical/morally, etc), then no country in the world is ethically/morally justified. Since that is the crux of Malcolm X's argument (and yours, by extension)...
Where do you draw the line, and how do you not make it arbitrary?
And some people wonder why they might be a little annoyed. If the same was done in the U.S or the U.K but the state created was a Muslim one, and year on year they started taking more and more land by military force, we'd do the exact same as the Palestinians, fight back.
Are you perhaps referring to say, the colonization of the United States? Guess what, the folks that were here (let's call them "native americans") did fight back. They lost. Your argument appears to be that the same thing is occuring elsewhere, and that's a problem.
Upvote
0