Obviously I have to pay to play, but it has to be the dumbest reasoning's I have ever heard for the charge......Simply put....STUPID!
So will all 4G phones going forward have this $10 charge, or only the ones with 4.3" screens? lol....Because, if the charge isn't purely for having a 4G enabled device, which I have no problem with that reasoning, what will be the reason for other 4G devices that won't quite have the specs as the EVO.
Why not just say 4G phone plans starting at $79.99. I don't think one person would have complained if they saw that, and Dan Hesse didn't make his stupid comments with 4G being cheaper to run!
And for people who say that 4G isn't available in there area so why should they pay, because the phone is capable and if they travel it will work in other places. You can go out and by an HDTV and spend good money because of it's HD features, but if you don't have HD channels in your house, they aren't going to reduce the price of the TV for you.....
It is pretty simple to see why Sprint is not a front runner in the cell industry and is being beat by providers who charge a lot more money for their sub par service.