HSPA 7.2 and HSPA+ planned

yea this has been posted several times.. it is good news indeed!

 

It's hard to believe, but how will we know if this has happened?

I am guessing a huge announcement and then a quick lawsuit against ATT for their then false "Fastest 3G network" claim.

 

I'm pretty sure T-Mobile as of now HAS the fastest 3G network so at&t can suck on their stubs...

 

but less of a coverae area

 

is this supposed to be tmobiles answer to 4g? why dont they concentrate on expanding 3g instead

 

Technically HSPA anything is 3G so I don't understand what you mean with that post. There only going to increase 3G with HSPA 7.2. Instead of uprgrading towers to raw UMTS they will just go straight to HSPA 7.2.

 

ok, im lost...lmao

 

What he is saying is the new network will lay on top of old it should just mesh right in and boost eveybodys signal and become stable network, somebody correct me if I am wrong.

 

Well I can say this morning christmas day I do have a full 3G signal and never have till today

 

this is supposed to take plac e before the 1st of the year. anyone see any differences yet? how would you be able to tell, just by a speed difference?

 

I finally got my Nokia N900 (supports up to 10Mb download on HSPA/HSPA+), and got a chance to get up to Philly's 7Mb network. In one area of the city, I was able to get 2.9Mb down and 1.8Mb up, vs. the 600Kb - 900Kb here outside of Baltimore. This was on the $10/mo "Shadow/web2go" plan (I think they are pretty much all the same), via the Internet2.voicestream.com APN. Unfortunately, speedtest.net reports me/my gateway as being in "Kansas".

I just switched to the $24/mo. "Smartphone plan", and while now all (3) APNs work (epc.tmobile.com, Internet2.voicestream.com, and wap.voicestream.com), I see no performance gain in my area.

FWIW, I was looking at getting a Milestone but no US 3G support supposedly...maybe on Canadian version.

 

You should see even faster data rates than that!. Also canadian version of the milestone will support 1900/850 UMTS so it will work on at&t but as for t mobile I don't see 1700mhz support in the future....

 

We get screwed all kinds of ways up here but we do get one thing, speed. I haven't quite managed the theoretical 7.2 but I can get >5 on a regular basis depending on location.

 

Yeah, I was just driving "at night" thru the city to get to my dad's...kinda hard to drive in Philly and kick off speed tests. I didn't spend much time there, but from what I understand, its not the whole city that has the 7Mb upgrade yet, only sections. Its still higher than what I was able to pull anywhere in Maryland/VA yet.

I'm kinda torn about going to AT&T, service has been good though, with my Motorola Q...I just really want to cut back on costs right now. I have way to many communication/media accounts.

 

im in kissimee florida and i am getting 949 kbps upload and 396 download.. not bad i guess.

 

That's what I'm getting in Maryland via www.speakeasy.net/speedtest

I get between 550Kb - 900Kb via speedtest.net, which has my traffic as coming out of New Jersey somewhere.

 

Man I wish I could get those great speeds. My area is "supposedly" 3G (while I still only get GPRS in some of the areas their map shows should be 3G). The best I pulled down was around 680kbps once.

Anyone know if T-mobile supports GPRS Class A at least? Getting my N900 tomorrow and that would allow voice/data simultaneously still if T-mobile's network supported it.

 

wow, after being spoiled with 5-10 times the averages I'm seeing here it would be hard to get used to those "3G" speeds. Granted that 1+M is decent for a phone but 5+ is even better.

 

I'm doing 3G voice and 3.5G data, at the same time, on my 900, w/T-Mo's $10/mo. "web2go" plan.

 

^that would be VoIP. yeah, no reason to wait for super speeds to do VoIP. 3G is more than enough for an 80kbs signal. latency and stability well that's another question.

 

I'm jealous. We don't have 3G coverage all over my city yet...Even when I put in specific addresses on T-mobile's coverage map it shows that is in the center of 3G and there isn't actually 3G service there. Guessing the map shows "soon to be live" coverage instead.

 

Especially since VoIP calls can be made at less than "30kbs"...but I've been seeing latency as high as 140ms at minimum. Skype "PSTN" calls have been working ok though. $3/mo for integrated Skype "Unlimited Minutes" beats the extra $20/mo I'd have to pay T-Mo. I just wish I could get my Vonage or Vonage Companion account to work via the SIP client, instead of just my Vonage Softphone.