Sean. The blotchyness of the Razr is actually an artifact of this Amoled and not a defect. You'll see it in dark rooms when the screen is trying to show black (most of the time black means the screen is off in that area).Well I returned the Razr because of the crazy screen issue I was having. Had a bunch of blotchy spots on the screen while the screen was black and on. Honestly didn't feel like going through 5 handsets to find a good one...lol.
So decided to give the Rezound a try.
It's a fine handset...but over all I just feel the Razr has more punch and the OS and UI just felt smoother in every day use.
The designs are so different, so there will people on one side of the fence for the Razr and people on the other for the Rezound and Sense...comes down to what the person likes better.
The comparison I'll make between the Razr and the Rezound (from a man's vantage point), it's like deciding whether to marry a stripper (the Razr) or a girl you met in one of your college classes (Rezound).
...
You can't go wrong with either phone but your best bet is to expose yourself to both and decide based on what's important to you.
Bah, both devices IMO are a wash- This perspective is after clearing out all demo noise from previous tests:
After testing last night to a compulsive level:
Ergonomics: Rez is better for one hand use- even with the 2700mah battery and cover (you all should by this NOW, $30 ATM at Verizon and will surprise you how nice it fits in the hand- plus protects camera lens better).
Speed: Razr is zippier, but when you remove Sense as the launcher, they are the same. I notice that game emulators are a little slower on the Rez, but with a 720p display, not a surprise.
Touch response: Razr is better, but most of this has to do with some apps not dealing well with the 342 DPI on the Rez. Emulators are a key example.
Display: A wash. Yep, the Rez has higher resolution, but unless you are a micro film reader, you end up one tapping to zoom test a little more, anyway. The contrast and viewing angles are much better on the Razr and a LOT less glare (easier to see outside). Still, the sexy 720p offsets the issues, so a wash IMO.
4G: A wash. Range appears the same in the Lexington area (new area for 4G).
Sound: Rezound is better. Though the Beats settings are artificial boosts (do not like), the sound quality is same, but the volume via 3.5 mm is more and I prefer the speaker output.
Heat: Both run about the same in simple to moderate tasks, but Flash video and game emulators like N64oid seem to push the the Rezound about 10 degrees higher. I was thinking the LTE chip was the issue, but seems more an issue of the semi-stacked design of the Rezound (per the teardown) and the dual core 1.5ghz kicking to max, along with 4G. With no apparent heat piping, seems par for the course.
Media storage: Razr hot swap card slot is tops.
Camera: Of course the Rezound
Call quality: Razr is better
Battery life: Not used either device long enough to make an opinion
The net result seems that folks would be happy with either device, but, ergonomics IMO are HUGE. The Rezound kicks the Razr's butt for ergonomics, even with the extended battery (Rez owners should be forced to buy this).
What seems to be winning me out though is the Razr is a lot easier to see in the sun, better touch response, hot swap card slot, better contrast and like having the HDMI and usb seperate and located on the top.
Still, most people are not compulsive rubes like me, so the ergonomics and the sexy 720p display in a lower light room should sway a lot of folks.
After using them both beyond tethered demos, IMO call them a wash and people should be happy with either device. Added: I do think however that the Rezound would be better off clocked down to 1.2ghz to ease some heat.
Bah, both devices IMO are a wash- This perspective is after clearing out all demo noise from previous tests:
After testing last night to a compulsive level:
Ergonomics: Rez is better for one hand use- even with the 2700mah battery and cover (you all should by this NOW, $30 ATM at Verizon and will surprise you how nice it fits in the hand- plus protects camera lens better).
Speed: Razr is zippier, but when you remove Sense as the launcher, they are the same. I notice that game emulators are a little slower on the Rez, but with a 720p display, not a surprise.
Touch response: Razr is better, but most of this has to do with some apps not dealing well with the 342 DPI on the Rez. Emulators are a key example.
Display: A wash. Yep, the Rez has higher resolution, but unless you are a micro film reader, you end up one tapping to zoom text a little more, anyway. The contrast and viewing angles are much better on the Razr and a LOT less glare (easier to see outside). Still, the sexy 720p offsets the issues, so a wash IMO.
4G: A wash. Range appears the same in the Lexington area (new area for 4G).
Sound: Rezound is better. Though the Beats settings are artificial boosts (do not like), the sound quality is same, but the volume via 3.5 mm is more and I prefer the speaker output.
Heat: Both run about the same in simple to moderate tasks, but Flash video and game emulators like N64oid seem to push the the Rezound about 10 degrees higher. I was thinking the LTE chip was the issue, but seems more an issue of the semi-stacked design of the Rezound (per the teardown) and the dual core 1.5ghz kicking to max, along with 4G. With no apparent heat piping, seems par for the course.
Media storage: Razr hot swap card slot is tops.
Camera: Of course the Rezound
Call quality: Razr is better
Battery life: Not used either device long enough to make an opinion
The net result seems that folks would be happy with either device, but, ergonomics IMO are HUGE. The Rezound kicks the Razr's butt for ergonomics, even with the extended battery (Rez owners should be forced to buy this).
What seems to be winning me out though is the Razr is a lot easier to see in the sun, better touch response, hot swap card slot, better contrast and like having the HDMI and usb seperate and located on the top.
Still, most people are not compulsive rubes like me, so the ergonomics and the sexy 720p display in a lower light room should sway a lot of folks.
After using them both beyond tethered demos, IMO call them a wash and people should be happy with either device. Added: I do think however that the Rezound would be better off clocked down to 1.2ghz to ease some heat.
My problem is both devices have features I want and features I don't want. I.e, I want the rezound ergo and higher volume; I want the razr anti-glare; resistance to scratches and light weight. The extra battery for the rezound is a nice + for travel the razr water resistance is a nice+.
-
My biggest concern for the rezound is heavy scratching of the display over a two years period and difficulty to use outdoors. These are the areas the razr win; but i hate the idea of limited battery life for the razr and the wide factor being somewhat awkwared for my hands.
-
Hum. Compromise. I could wait for the nexus and see what compromises it brings to the table (my guess on reviews is lower volume than the razr; worse reception; better form factor and improve scratch resistance; and of course lack of sd slot).
-
Hum. Compromises. Why can't someone make the perfect phone. If I wait till Dec 12th or so will verizon double data rate and amazon 1ct deals still be viable ?
If you take the 3 phones that are out or will soon be out (Rezound, Razr, Nexus) if you were to build your ideal dream phone, unless you're a homer, I can see taking hardware or software from all 3 devices to build the one perfect device. I'd take the visual packaging from the Razr with the curved back of the Nexus, packaged in the guts of the Rezound (LTE and 720p with the Beats and I don't mind the "old" tech of the HTC's dual core setup although that's debatable) with ICS and NFC from the Nexus, the easily accessible SD slot of the Razr...and I know I'm probably missing something but that's probably how I would start to package my dream device.
What seems to be winning me out though is the Razr is a lot easier to see in the sun, better touch response, hot swap card slot, better contrast and like having the HDMI and usb seperate and located on the top.
Still, most people are not compulsive rubes like me, so the ergonomics and the sexy 720p display in a lower light room should sway a lot of folks.
After using them both beyond tethered demos, IMO call them a wash and people should be happy with either device. Added: I do think however that the Rezound would be better off clocked down to 1.2ghz to ease some heat.
Odd why this has not been done yet.
I agree...not only with hardware but with the different mobile OS's. We can only dream tho, right?
On your take tho...I would go with a Exynos or OMAP for the dual core chip. Maybe the chip in the iPhone 4S. Everything else seems good to me.
Amoled screen with sharpness of the Rezound screen, outdoor viewing, and brightness of the Bionic? Nice....
On the first point...I had no idea but its better on top to me too. HDMI is more out of the way of playing a game connected to the TV, looking at Netflix and charging at the same time is better ..
On the 2nd point....IMO they can clock it down to 1Ghz. I tried with my RAZR...and it seemed to help with heat. Now its not an an issue at 1.2 anymore, dont know if I just got used to it or its not as warm anymore. But for my 2 weeks with the RAZR, 1Ghz was fine. Thats why some folks with a Bionic dont really see that much of a difference vs the RAZR.
It wouldn't surprise me if a rep from HTC, Samsung, and Motorola got together and had a "phone draft". They listed all the features on a top tier phone and each got to pick what they would focus their attention on. I find it interesting that each device has one thing really going for them and isn't really encroached on by the other manufacturers. It almost seems planned...."Ok Samsung, you get ICS but you can't have removable media." "Ok HTC, you can have a 720p screen, but you can't amp up the color, we'll give that to Motorola, Oh and don't invest in a visually stunning design, that's going to Motorola too". It feels almost purposefully orchestrated. /tinfoil hat
I don't think there's a clear winner since both phones excel in their own area of expertise and perform admirably in other areas. I'd say anyone that claims otherwise either has professional ties to HTC or Motorola or is too wrapped up in their fanboism to give credit to the other device. You can't go wrong with either phone but your best bet is to expose yourself to both and decide based on what's important to you.
What seems to be winning me out though is the Razr is a lot easier to see in the sun, better touch response, hot swap card slot, better contrast and like having the HDMI and usb seperate and located on the top.
Oddly the razr seems to be getting a bit more hate (complaints) than the rezound so that too is metric.
Well some of it could be price for components (lcd screen vs oled); not really sure here. I was checking the phones out again (now i'm starting to swing back towards the razr) and made a point to check reflection status (razr does in fact dim reflect lights in the store; while hte rezound reflect nice and bright) as an indication of effect on outdoor viewing. Oh well. I guess for me now the biggest unknown is battery life (for myself) and usability out doors. Everything else I've sort of already quantified after these numerous visits. I obviously like (and dislike) aspects of both phones. Oddly the razr seems to be getting a bit more hate (complaints) than the rezound so that too is metric. I really amazed at the rezound (reading users reviews on amazon, verizon, cnet, ...) the number of peopel who talk about the lack of visilbity outside and the number who say it is visible outside. I mean how can one person see the display and another not see it ? Can't they make up their mind ?
I mean I can understand why some folks have good call quality and others don't or why the battery might last longer for some people and not others; but being able to view the screen outdoors ? Go figure for the inconsistent comments
I love your analogy. I'm currently using a Rezound and really like it. I'm not crazy about Sense, but I still may not be used to it. I must confess that every time I go into a VZW store and play with the Razr, I lust for that 'stripper'.
I'm more used to the Motorola UI, so it may explain some of my reservations about the Rezound. But I will say that reception has been very good and pretty much on par with my Bionic (perhaps just a bit better).
I'm not sure though which phone has the edge in reception though, I've read some very positive posts about the Razr's 4G reception.
One thing I noticed about the Rezound that I haven't seen anyone else comment on, is the camera's default settings. Although to a casual observer the pictures look very sharp, when you display them on a computer, I see very definite edge enhancement. It's as if the sharpness is set too high at its default setting. I first noticed this just looking at a picture I shot at a VZW store and looking at it on the Rezound's screen. To me it was that obvious.
Don't get me wrong, I think the pix are nice, but I think they are flawed. My buddy was over yesterday and he plans on buying my Bionic. For fun we took a few pictures with both the Rezound & the Bionic and when displayed on the computer, the Bionic actually had more 'real' detail and far less edge enhancement. Most people probably wouldn't care about stuff like this, but since I'm so in to video and the like, I do see it.
I also find the videos pretty poor on the Rezound (nothing to write home about in the Bionic either). Some of the videos I've seen from the Razr look better to me than either the Rezound or the Bionic. It's odd since I think the camera is essentially the same in both the Bionic & the Razr. But I've also seen considerable variation in camera quality from one Razr to another.
In the end, as you said, both phones are great and it's hard to make the wrong decision. In fact either one may well be better than even the upcoming GNex...but then again maybe they won't be.
I'll comment about my experience with the battery and see if it helps. The first day I took my phone to work I noticed how poor my 4G reception was. I kept going in and out of 4G and my battery life was down to about 50% after only 4 hours, seemed like the Thunderbolt. To be honest I was trying to download a 1.5 gig file and my inconsistent 4G signal wasn't helping. The follwing day I noticed a much better 4G signal, but why?!?! Oh that's right, the previous day was foggy, rainy, and miserable. I even managed 4G at home, which was a rarity with the Thunderbolt. So if you are in a not so dense 4G area, regardless of which phone you get, you might want to get a spare....oh right no access to the battery in the razr.......
In the end, for me, I think that's the winning feature, the screen. The contrast on text, pictures and virtually anything are much greater on the Razr and therefore (at least for me) easier to see despite the higher rez of the Rezound.
In looking at how I tend to hold and use a phone (other than using the phone for a call), I tend to use two hands anyway. So the ability to more easily hold a phone while texting or doing whatever, in one hand becomes less important. If you're using two hands, I see no ergonomic advantage with either phone. If you do tend to use a phone with just one hand, then the Rezound will have the ergonomic advantage.
BTW, I haven't really noticed any significant issues with the touchscreen on the Rezound...maybe I just haven't used the apps that bring it out.
In reading tons of reviews (both user & professional), it seems to me that most 'complaints' come from people that don't own the phone. I see many complaints in the good ol' GNex thread...of course many there despise anything that's not GNex.
From what I've seen, it seems that the pro reviews tend to give a bit of an edge to the Razr. The complaints from owners of the Razr seem to mostly revolve around one thing, battery life. But then again so many owners praise battery life. But that does remain my major concern about the Razr.
It's like you say, one loves the same thing that the next owner hates.
Lust is pretty much the feeling I got with the Razr. It's a sexy phone that's for sure. I'd say it's style over function (just barely though because it's also a powerhouse inside). The Resound is not outright ugly, but it's not the looker that the Razr is. Once I started to view some 720p content on here, I knew I'd made the right choice.
I think you misread my rant. I understand the inconsistency in battery performance; its the inconsistency in out door viewing that has me confused. Several folks have dinged the rezound for lack of visibility outside while others say it is a non issue.
I think you misread my rant. I understand the inconsistency in battery performance; its the inconsistency in out door viewing that has me confused. Several folks have dinged the rezound for lack of visibility outside while others say it is a non issue.
See it's hard for me to get this sometimes. I guess it's just me but the Razr doesn't look sexy to me. Different...yes, sexy and stylish....I just can't see it. Again this is just a personal opinion. I do realize that beauty is in the eye of the beholder though and my ReZound is a sight to behold to me..lol.
We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.