needless to say, it is now a contest between galaxy s and evo: but the more i ponder, i realize that samsung is overall a better option; screen is only 0.3 inches smaller but still huge and on top of that it is brighter, more efficient, better under sunlight. camera is 3 mps lower but mps mean nothing in cameras and the camcorder still shoots HD videos anyways, and given HTC's record in camera quality, i would not be surprised if samsung's 5 mp cam takes nicer pics than HTC's 8 mp cam. while the galaxy s does not do HDMI, its GPU is faster than that of all currently existing smartphones. the battery and CPU are the same for both. therefore, the features in which the galaxy s is superior to the evo seem to me more important (in terms of every day usage) than the features in which the evo is superior to the galaxy s. off course there is the 4g that evo has and the supposed flash support and the nice kickstand and the gorgeous red accents in the back of the evo. but then again, there is the ever more convenient thinness of the galaxy s, along with its higher internal storage and newer bluetooth . as far as the custom UI, well, i would turn off both sense and smart life because i want android's 3d scrolling and gallery. but wait: galaxy has no camera flash but there is one thing that i hate about both evo and galaxy s, which is something that all of you hate: THE FACT THAT WE HAVE TO WAIT FOR THESE PUPPIES! ouch....i want june to come NOW! and hopefully galaxy s is t-mobile usa bound! what do you guys think? evo or galaxy s?