It really depends what you're looking for in a phone. I feel like much of the specs in the upper end devices, are used to win a hardware war, where one cannot be won with software. I don't really need a 1080 display draining more battery, and I've watched as people deactivated cores, which seems counter to the purpose of buying a higher spec phone-- most of all, I've long stopped doing benchmark tests, and place much more emphasis on how the device feels and utilizes the advertised features, day-to-day (to that end, I'm not as wild about the GS4).Thank you! You are spot on with everything you said. I don't understand the excessive hype for a mid range phone either. If you look around any Android website....people are actually going gaga for this thing. lol I understand what kind of customers Motorola is aiming for but for people to say this is the best thing ever, need to stop. Is it better than my Galaxy Nexus? Yes. Is it enough to upgrade? No. I'm looking for the Note 3 or the next Nexus.
If the Moto X can prove that good and meaningful integration of software and hardware produces an A+ product, then I see much reason to be excited about it, even if it turns out it isn't the phone for me. Of course, the best idea is to wait and see (especially regarding the price), but I'm actually fine with many of the specs, and about the only thing I'd wish for, is a bigger battery, if that will even matter.
If it so much as accounts for the small list of shortcomings that I've had with my GN, I'll actually be happy. So yeah, bring on the hype...it's refreshing to see such a push, without trying to one-up in the hardware arena.
Upvote
0