Well here's another one from the renowned Dirrk: https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0Bx...MDUyMDY3ZGRjMzIy&sort=name&layout=list&num=50
This one is proclaimed low voltage; at this moment I dont know how low is low. I know the stock Kernal does 1Ghz on 1300mV. The Kernal Im using and linked above does 1.2Ghz on 1325mV. However, the dev's of the Epic had a stable 1.2Ghz Kernal that only needs 1250mV so yes OC'd and undervolted, sweetness. My assumption is Dirrk probably hit this speed at this voltage too; although as I type its unconfirmed.
Im going to sleep now as its 250am here so if anyone wants to try this one go for it otherwise I will probably do it in the morning.
So I've tinkered with the 1.2Ghz Kernal and everything works and everything seems snappier. Heat is a non-issue, there is more battery use when the screen is light and the cpu is chugging away; although overclocked and overvolted thats expected. I really would love that 1.2Ghz Kernal with 1250mV if thats what Dirrks turns out to be. However, in sleep mode its the same since the min set is the same 100Mhz as stock. BTW, some guys were going down to 200Mhz but I've had no problems whatsoever with the 100Mhz min setting; it is the default one anyway. So when in sleep mode the battery life is the same. Overall, its a relatively small hit on battery life for the extra 20% on the top end for speed. Considering how good most of us were doing on battery life before this it should not severely or negatively impact anyone. And again, if Dirrk or anyone gets us an overclocked and undervolted Kernal we should see even better battery performance.
This one is proclaimed low voltage; at this moment I dont know how low is low. I know the stock Kernal does 1Ghz on 1300mV. The Kernal Im using and linked above does 1.2Ghz on 1325mV. However, the dev's of the Epic had a stable 1.2Ghz Kernal that only needs 1250mV so yes OC'd and undervolted, sweetness. My assumption is Dirrk probably hit this speed at this voltage too; although as I type its unconfirmed.
Im going to sleep now as its 250am here so if anyone wants to try this one go for it otherwise I will probably do it in the morning.
So I've tinkered with the 1.2Ghz Kernal and everything works and everything seems snappier. Heat is a non-issue, there is more battery use when the screen is light and the cpu is chugging away; although overclocked and overvolted thats expected. I really would love that 1.2Ghz Kernal with 1250mV if thats what Dirrks turns out to be. However, in sleep mode its the same since the min set is the same 100Mhz as stock. BTW, some guys were going down to 200Mhz but I've had no problems whatsoever with the 100Mhz min setting; it is the default one anyway. So when in sleep mode the battery life is the same. Overall, its a relatively small hit on battery life for the extra 20% on the top end for speed. Considering how good most of us were doing on battery life before this it should not severely or negatively impact anyone. And again, if Dirrk or anyone gets us an overclocked and undervolted Kernal we should see even better battery performance.
Upvote
0