1. Download our Official Android App: Forums for Android!

New math

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by MoodyBlues, Apr 8, 2019.

  1. MoodyBlues

    MoodyBlues Choose compassion over cruelty
    VIP Member Thread Starter
    Rank:
     #24
    Points:
    1,013
    Posts:
    6,294
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011

    Jan 27, 2011
    6,294
    5,076
    1,013
    Formerly Linux sysadmin/programmer
    $HOME/LosAngeles
    It looks like there's some kind of new math around these days, math I definitely missed in five college math courses.

    I was sitting here minding my own business when I became aware of it. This bottle of "Orange Creme" flavored water I'm drinking is sitting on my nightstand. Its back was toward me as I reached for it, and this is where I saw...it...new math!

    1554755298034.jpg

    See it? The calories?

    Anyone know when this new law involving zero came along?
     

    Advertisement

    Davdi and ocnbrze like this.
  2. ocnbrze

    ocnbrze DON'T PANIC!!!!!!!!!
    Rank:
     #7
    Points:
    3,108
    Posts:
    27,184
    Joined:
    May 13, 2010

    May 13, 2010
    27,184
    17,112
    3,108
    Male
    being a flashaholic sponsor, helping others gettin
    los angeles
    hmmm what brand is that?

    yeah definitely not 0 calories.......lol
     
    MoodyBlues likes this.
  3. PitCarver

    PitCarver Android Expert
    Rank:
     #59
    Points:
    393
    Posts:
    1,180
    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2015

    Jul 3, 2015
    1,180
    1,239
    393
    Male
    Retired
    South Carolina
    New fangled edible bottle?
    That's where the calories are.
     
  4. MoodyBlues

    MoodyBlues Choose compassion over cruelty
    VIP Member Thread Starter
    Rank:
     #24
    Points:
    1,013
    Posts:
    6,294
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011

    Jan 27, 2011
    6,294
    5,076
    1,013
    Formerly Linux sysadmin/programmer
    $HOME/LosAngeles
    It's Signature Select, which is a Vons house brand.

    Tastes great, by the way! Just like those orange Dreamsicles(?) from childhood. :D
     
    ocnbrze likes this.
  5. mikedt

    mikedt 你好
    Rank:
     #6
    Points:
    3,238
    Posts:
    27,488
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2010

    Sep 22, 2010
    27,488
    16,983
    3,238
    Teachaaa
    Jinan, China
    I guess the 15 calories is the bottle itself, which you wouldn't normally eat in a serving.
     
    Clementine_3 and MoodyBlues like this.
  6. MoodyBlues

    MoodyBlues Choose compassion over cruelty
    VIP Member Thread Starter
    Rank:
     #24
    Points:
    1,013
    Posts:
    6,294
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011

    Jan 27, 2011
    6,294
    5,076
    1,013
    Formerly Linux sysadmin/programmer
    $HOME/LosAngeles
    But...there are about three servings. :thinking:
     
    mikedt likes this.
  7. mikedt

    mikedt 你好
    Rank:
     #6
    Points:
    3,238
    Posts:
    27,488
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2010

    Sep 22, 2010
    27,488
    16,983
    3,238
    Teachaaa
    Jinan, China
    If you cut the bottle into three, there would be 5 calories in each serving of it.
     
    Clementine_3 and ocnbrze like this.
  8. MoodyBlues

    MoodyBlues Choose compassion over cruelty
    VIP Member Thread Starter
    Rank:
     #24
    Points:
    1,013
    Posts:
    6,294
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011

    Jan 27, 2011
    6,294
    5,076
    1,013
    Formerly Linux sysadmin/programmer
    $HOME/LosAngeles
    This is kind of like being stuck in an MC Escher drawing! You're overlooking the fact that each serving has zero calories. If we cut up the bottle and eat it, each third having 5 calories, then that conflicts with its labelling...
     
    mikedt and ocnbrze like this.
  9. ocnbrze

    ocnbrze DON'T PANIC!!!!!!!!!
    Rank:
     #7
    Points:
    3,108
    Posts:
    27,184
    Joined:
    May 13, 2010

    May 13, 2010
    27,184
    17,112
    3,108
    Male
    being a flashaholic sponsor, helping others gettin
    los angeles
    yeah 0+0+0=15......duh:cool:
     
    MoodyBlues likes this.
  10. GameTheory

    GameTheory Android Expert
    Rank:
     #28
    Points:
    743
    Posts:
    4,283
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012

    It's most likely just an oversight with the label manufacturer(poor quality control). This even happens to big brand names, especially when not everything is made in-house and they need to outsource. Labels are very commonly outsourced.

    Some overworked and underpaid person made a boo boo.

    So they either meant to label 0 cals per container or 5 cals per serving.

    I bet if you contact them about this they'll have some snazzy explanation that doesn't involve admitting to a mistake.
     
    olbriar, ocnbrze and MoodyBlues like this.
  11. MoodyBlues

    MoodyBlues Choose compassion over cruelty
    VIP Member Thread Starter
    Rank:
     #24
    Points:
    1,013
    Posts:
    6,294
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011

    Jan 27, 2011
    6,294
    5,076
    1,013
    Formerly Linux sysadmin/programmer
    $HOME/LosAngeles
    Thanks, you're probably spot-on.

    But you know what? It's more fun trying to figure out how this new math works. :p :D
     
    GameTheory and ocnbrze like this.
  12. PitCarver

    PitCarver Android Expert
    Rank:
     #59
    Points:
    393
    Posts:
    1,180
    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2015

    Jul 3, 2015
    1,180
    1,239
    393
    Male
    Retired
    South Carolina
    No, no, no, and no.

    You can't eat the bottle when it's full.
    You can't cut the bottle until it's emptied.

    liberal nutjob.jpg
     
  13. LV426

    LV426 I say we take off and nuke this place from orbit
    Recognized Developer
    Rank:
     #13
    Points:
    1,988
    Posts:
    9,176
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2015

    Oct 16, 2015
    9,176
    13,681
    1,988
    Male
    Software developer
    South West of England
    In the UK
    New Math == NO math

    My Daughter's learned much more since we started home schooling her. :thumbsupdroid:
     
    MoodyBlues, PitCarver and Unforgiven like this.
  14. MoodyBlues

    MoodyBlues Choose compassion over cruelty
    VIP Member Thread Starter
    Rank:
     #24
    Points:
    1,013
    Posts:
    6,294
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011

    Jan 27, 2011
    6,294
    5,076
    1,013
    Formerly Linux sysadmin/programmer
    $HOME/LosAngeles
    But can she solve our math problem? :)
     
  15. LV426

    LV426 I say we take off and nuke this place from orbit
    Recognized Developer
    Rank:
     #13
    Points:
    1,988
    Posts:
    9,176
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2015

    Oct 16, 2015
    9,176
    13,681
    1,988
    Male
    Software developer
    South West of England
    Well my old math agrees with GT's calculation. If there are 3 servings per container, and the whole container is 15 calories, then a serving is 5 calories, not 0.

    And further consultation with the Internet, which never lies :) informs me that 1g of carbohydrate contains 4 calories, and the bottle says that a serving has 1g of carbs. This kind of ties in with the 15 calories per container (3g carbs).
    So I conclude that the 0 calories per serving is the error, and should be 5 calories.
     
    bcrichster and MoodyBlues like this.
  16. dan330

    dan330 Extreme Android User
    Rank:
    None
    Points:
    1,143
    Posts:
    12,494
    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010

    Jan 22, 2010
    12,494
    4,007
    1,143
    calories are heavy!!!
    so they sink to the bottom of liquid.

    water on top.. no calories for the first 2 servings.
    15 calories for the last and 3rd serving.

    duh!!!!
     
  17. MoodyBlues

    MoodyBlues Choose compassion over cruelty
    VIP Member Thread Starter
    Rank:
     #24
    Points:
    1,013
    Posts:
    6,294
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011

    Jan 27, 2011
    6,294
    5,076
    1,013
    Formerly Linux sysadmin/programmer
    $HOME/LosAngeles
    That's all well and good, my friend, but our problem involves multiplying the stated 3 servings by 0 calories, and ending up with 15. Hence, the 'new math' title. We must throw standard logic out the window! ;)

    So far, I think the 'bottle itself contains calories' and the 'calories sink to the bottom' theories are most promising, but they still don't prove that 3 x 0 = 15
     
    mikedt likes this.
  18. mikedt

    mikedt 你好
    Rank:
     #6
    Points:
    3,238
    Posts:
    27,488
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2010

    Sep 22, 2010
    27,488
    16,983
    3,238
    Teachaaa
    Jinan, China
    I did actually ask around the math teachers' office on this one, and the most likely conclusion is it's a typo, and not that the bottle is edible and wasn't included in the servings.
     
    bcrichster and MoodyBlues like this.
  19. olbriar

    olbriar  
    Moderator
    Rank:
     #11
    Points:
    2,013
    Posts:
    20,294
    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2010

    Jun 19, 2010
    20,294
    24,098
    2,013
    Male
    Land of Oz
    The 0 actually represents an unknown quantity for we do not actually know the serving size. About three is what we have to go on. 15 calories per container is the given. Two gulps per container would make 0 = 7.5 calories. Three gulps and 0 would equal 5 calories. Four gulps 3.5 etc.
     
    MoodyBlues likes this.
  20. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven ...eschew obfuscation...
    Moderator
    Rank:
     #2
    Points:
    4,488
    Posts:
    38,323
    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2010

    Jun 23, 2010
    38,323
    47,580
    4,488
    Male
    Douglas, MA
    My guess is dumb labeling regulations. Like "less than 5 calories can be said to be "calorie free" or something stupid like that.
     
    bcrichster and MoodyBlues like this.
  21. LV426

    LV426 I say we take off and nuke this place from orbit
    Recognized Developer
    Rank:
     #13
    Points:
    1,988
    Posts:
    9,176
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2015

    Oct 16, 2015
    9,176
    13,681
    1,988
    Male
    Software developer
    South West of England
    Could be. In other words they're saying that the calorie intake per serving is negligible.
     
    bcrichster and Unforgiven like this.
  22. bcrichster

    bcrichster ROMinator
    Moderator
    Rank:
     #21
    Points:
    1,063
    Posts:
    7,074
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013

    Jan 23, 2013
    7,074
    5,653
    1,063
    Male
    Electrical, Electronics
    Florida
    Ooh I know.. part of 'common core' math. AKA: only makes sense to the ppl 'making up' the answers when writing the label, Lmao
     
    MoodyBlues likes this.
  23. bcrichster

    bcrichster ROMinator
    Moderator
    Rank:
     #21
    Points:
    1,063
    Posts:
    7,074
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013

    Jan 23, 2013
    7,074
    5,653
    1,063
    Male
    Electrical, Electronics
    Florida
    Yes, when doing stuff like labels.. I think the general practice is $$/per character and the single digit '0' is effectively a much cheaper cost than the 10 digit 'negligible'.. then multiply it by like a million times. Drastic cost savings = faulty label..??
     
    MoodyBlues and Unforgiven like this.
  24. today

    today Android Expert
    Rank:
     #111
    Points:
    123
    Posts:
    974
    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2010

    Mar 30, 2010
    974
    407
    123
    Male
    spanaway washington
    No one has concluded which number is the misprint?
     
    MoodyBlues likes this.
  25. dan330

    dan330 Extreme Android User
    Rank:
    None
    Points:
    1,143
    Posts:
    12,494
    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010

    Jan 22, 2010
    12,494
    4,007
    1,143
    i think the rounding of numbers is most LIKELY answer.

    rounding to nearest 15...0, 15, 30, 45....etc...

    example:
    bottle has 21 calories... round to 15
    21/3 = 7 .. round it to 0
     
    MoodyBlues likes this.

Share This Page

Loading...