Well my last post wasn't really meant to be a can I do this and get away with it post. Cooolone2's post got me to thinking about the legality issue of modifying your property in order to use it where you want to. So after doing a little research I posted my findings just to see if anyone else dared to discuss it further.
As for using my Hero to do this, not sure I would right now but not sure I wouldn't either. I do get what you are saying about losing some of the service going to prepaid, but for some people losing a few features and dropping your cost by more than 2/3rds of the price is something to consider. It's not like my Sprint plan is breaking me and to be honest Sprint postpaid already offers the lowest prices available and gives more benefits and features than any of the other carriers. So I love Sprint, bad customer service and all.
Losing roaming isn't a big deal to many people who never use it, like me. I have never had my roaming indicator show on any of my phones. I had actually used Virgin Mobile back in like 2004 or 2005 for a couple months after I moved and no longer got service with t-mobile at my new house. Ended up going with Verizon and hated it. Long story and not relative to this discussion anyway.
So you lose roaming, not a big deal to me really.
Visual voicemail, while I love visual voicemail, it's not really necessary when you have google voice. That voicemail actually is better because you get a decent to good transcription right in your mailbox. The only hitch here would be if Sprint will not allow for the free forwarding of voicemail to google voice. I am gonna tweet at virgin mobile real quick and see if they know if you can do this on their service, but Sprint does do this so I am hopeful. Either way, if visual voicemail is necessary I could just, as I already do mostly, give out my google voice number instead of mobile number. This also ensures texts come in over data since google voice sms is over data.
Prepaid has always had less functionality and less service than contracted service. That's the way it's always been. If you think about it, it really wouldn't be a very business-savvy move to give the same level of service for a much cheaper price. No company will undercut its own business. You are paying less, but you are getting less.
While I sort-of agree with this, I think Sprint is in a different position here. Sprint has been undercutting their own business for awhile now and I believe it is because Sprint has seen the light and had a realization of the future. Sprint already gives more features than any of their competition and charge much less all while providing nationwide service on their and Verizon's network. Even with all these positives Sprint has been losing customers hand over fist for years. Then they started doing something interesting, Prepaid.
Sprint had Boost Mobile, but they made that even better by adding a cdma Boost product. Of course they are trying to stop new service on that but it is probably because they Bought Virgin as their CDMA prepaid product last year. With Boost you get unlimited talk, text, web and walkie-talkie for $50 a month. That is with either cdma or iden boost but for cdma boost you must buy one of the phones before they run out because they are not going to ship any more cdma only iden. So Boost already undercuts Sprint and uses either the Sprint or iden networks. Now they have Virgin, and starting on the 12th they offer the Beyond Talk plans. These plans offer unlimited data, text and a limited number of voice minutes. They also offer blackberry service for $10 a month, so for $35 a month you get 300 minutes voice, unlimited blackberry, unlimited web and unlimited text and all on Sprint's network. That is an insanely good deal to someone who doesn't use voice as much as they do data and folks who want to live in the BlackBerry world. Sprint also has another prepaid service that is subsidized for low income families. It offers a free amount of minutes per month and is in select cities now, but supposedly will be available in 25 states by the end of the year.
So sprint owns 2 post-paid services and 3 pre-paid services and rumor has it they may be working on adding yet another pre-paid service soon. So what does all this mean as far as subscribers??? Well they still lose subscribers every time new data comes out but breaking it down by services shows they lose subscribers in post-paid but gain in pre-paid. No wonder they are focusing on Pre-paid now huh??? They appear to have a good idea of how to work it too, but creating multiple products that cater to different type of customers. We customers like to have things our way after all don't we?
So if you are a voice heavy user sign up with Boost and get unlimited voice, the main drawback being that data is not as nice as the phone selection limits it's usefulness. If you use a lot of data and less voice, go with Virgin and enjoy the better data service with more data-centric phones. In the future the main thing keeping post-paid subscribers could very well be the access to the latest and greatest phones.
The last thing I'll say right now is that regardless of what the carrier says about restricting usage to certain devices they are wrong. Anyone remember when they were auctioning off bandwidth not too long ago and device access and network openness became an issue? Verizon was the worst about only allowing devices they crippled to be used on their networks. Well this isn't the year 2000 anymore and there is no reason to think it is right for a carrier to be able to tell you not to use your phone that is compatible with their network.
The way I see it is this, Sprint owns both services and offers the Hero and the LG Rumor Touch on their network. So is there any reason they should be allowed to tell you that you can't take the phone you own, lg rumor touch, and activate it on virgin? No, there is no reason they should be allowed to force you to buy a new phone when the one you have is compatible. How is any other phone offered from Sprint any different? This is tantamount to your cable company telling you that in order to use their internet you have to purchase a new computer from them and for their cable to work you have to buy a new tv from them. Actually, since Sprint owns both services, this is more like the cable company making you buy a tv from them to watch their basic service and then when you decide you want to change the service to digital or HDtv or whatever then they make you buy the exact same phone model again. There is no reason Sprint, or any carrier should be able to legally do this.
The carriers should have open networks that allow access to all different kinds of devices. Instead of thinking networks are a closed ecosystem they eventually need to embrace the openness we all expect in the other facets of our lives.