Once again... I was simply commentating on the general message by many conservatives/republican about "government always getting in the way" and "do you really want the government to be in charge of things," as this is one case where I would have liked to see more regulation, even if it cost the company a little more money to do things like they should have.
So your comments are above reproach and are to simply be accepted? Your comments are just musings and not to be taken seriously as points to debate? Good god, how are people supposed to know the difference?
So you made the statement that if Bush is to be blamed for Katrina, then Obama is to be blamed for the oil leak.
Here you are saying that Bush is not to be blamed for Katrina. Fair enough, I agreed with that beforehand.
Specifically, where did I say that Bush was not to be blamed for the AFTERMATH of Katrina? You keep dropping that typical lib talk that says Bush is blamed for Katrina when you say you don't blame him. Which is it?
The crucifixion of Bush began within the first days after Katrina, an event of nature. Obama has had 37 days of a man-made event from a rig he gave his blessing....and does nothing.
And yet here you are saying that Obama is to be blamed for the current state of the oil spill. So your previous statement is either nullified or your being completely hypocritical. Reality. This point. They seem to be foreign to each other.
No, you are putting words in my mouth. Like I said, show me
exactly where I said
Bush should not be blamed for anything. Come on, surely you can do that...or are you being less than truthful?
The real hypocrisy comes from the lefties that still blame Bush today but give Obama a free pass and refuse to hold him responsible for anything. Man-made event vs. an event of nature. Bush was crucified in a few days after Katrina. Obama has had 37 days and does nothing. The left ignores it and blames anything else to divert attention. Like Olbermann trying to blame Sarah Palin.
What is Obama going to the site of the Oil Spill going to do?
It is symbolic, it shows he might be human and care a small bit in his elitist tower. Bush was slammed for flying above New Orleans after Katrina instead of personally visiting (at first). No criticism of Obama, even 37 days later. I am seeing a pattern here with libs....how about you?
Additionally, Obama might actually have feelings for people that are the salt of the earth and finally declare it a disaster area, making them eligible for federal relief. You know, since they pay those high taxes and all.
Also Obama never made the throat on neck statement...
Obama said he wanted to be held responsible (after elected) and promised a new and higher level of government. This is it? His regime made the remark. It is the typical elitist poor taste that always bubbles to the top.
Even so, they seem to be criticized for it for exercising to much power. Then 5 minutes later they are blamed and criticized again for not having the problem solved.
You can't have it both ways.
Oh, so you are holding me responsible for every remark made by any conservative in the news? Fine by me, I will have a LOT of fun with this game as long as YOU agree to be held accountable right down the line with anything and everything made by ANY liberal in the news. Agreed?