what a joke


Well-Known Member
I agree, this is very badly written. Everyone has their own opinion of course as to which one's better, but the article is terrible.


wow, that guy is a douche. Its pretty obvious that he has no idea what he is talking about. Very badly researched. 10 mins on this forum or any other would have given him all the info that he missed.( which is a hell of a lot)
no front facing camera? - idiot
listing iphone 4 as being able to multitask- congratulations apple on finally being able to do what others have been doing for years.
god it works me up just thinking abut how badly biased that article was.


i guess we have to wait to put both together and then the debates will continue with facts. one more day to wait i guess. at least.

Evil Peter

Well-Known Member
It's obvious from the way they write that they aren't even comparing the phones, they are comparing the specs and obviously don't know enough to draw relevant conclusions from them. I don't care if they think iPhone 4 is more suited to them but that was one of the worst articles I've read.


Android Expert
lolz, how is a 3.5" lcd better than a 4" Super AMOLED?

Both the Samsung Galaxy S and the iPhone 4 feature a 1GHz processor. The Galaxy S's processor is ARM's Cortex A8 1GHz processor, while the iPhone4 uses Apple's own Apple A4 processor.
We've seen the capabilities of Apple's A4 processor on the iPad and it performs fantastically well. Samsung has a lot to compete with in this arena.
Winner: iPhone 4"

Seriously??? We don't even know what the iphone processor is clocked at yet and he declares it the winner?? Let alone the fact that they both use the same ARM Cortex A8 processor lol.


Well-Known Member
It was a great review, unfortunately he forgot one very important thing:

"Which phone has the word "phone" in it's name but hardly lives up to it?

Winner: IP4"