2.0 coming for Galaxy i7500 in March/April

[Matenrou]

uhm it only says that spica will get 2.0
not galaxy :/

 

[mrqs]

uhm it only says that spica will get 2.0
not galaxy :/

that would be absolutely outrageous, as spica is supposed to be the "lite" version of galaxy

 

[damuffinman]

It's hardly a 'Lite' phone, with a faster processor clock speed than the Galaxy

Then again the camera is only 3.2 MP, but it's not like there's a difference between the Spica and the Galaxy with such a poor camera interface.

 

[mrqs]

well that's how it was presented long before it even came out and got the "spica" name to replace the "lite"

 

[Naruvam]

BTW the galaxy lite processor isnt necesarily real world faster than the galaxy one. They have used an _old_ samsung processor in the lite, which isnt very good imho

Kam is right about clock speed. It doesn't really mean spica will be faster phone hence the lite in it(+camera chip, and no internal storage)

 

[mrqs]

sure, but the spica's cpu can't be that much slower and like damuffinman mentioned, the camera hardly counts either because of the software
so the only proper edge the "real" galaxy has over the "lite" is internal storage, and if the spica gets eclair and it's daddy doesn't, i think the apprentice pretty much becomes the master, which is a big f-u to all of us that thought we were buying a flagship

 

[jthreads]

sure, but the spica's cpu can't be that much slower and like damuffinman mentioned, the camera hardly counts either because of the software
so the only proper edge the "real" galaxy has over the "lite" is internal storage, and if the spica gets eclair and it's daddy doesn't, i think the apprentice pretty much becomes the master, which is a big f-u to all of us that thought we were buying a flagship

I fully agree with you

 

[thedeli]

Iasked samsung T