So Swype has made it well known that they do not want their software "stolen" so much to the point that they've scared AF to the point that the mere mention of a link will get a thread locked.
Meanwhile, another site prolifically posts different "stolen" updates for Swype like there's no tomorrow.
So instead of threatening another site like they have AF, they do the exact opposite: give 50 free beta invites to Swype.
What gives? They won't open up the beta to the public, but gives closed (precious) invites to the one website that basically distributes illegal copies of their software! Only thing worse would've been to put it on xda itself! =)
Don't get me wrong, I don't fault AF for abiding by their own rules as well as Swype's requests. I'm just confused by why Swype would endorse and embrace a site that seems to do exactly what they've requested AF not to do...
On top of which: they're asking AF to police individuals' posts. meanwhile, the DL editors are the ones posting it! they're content generators, not forum-post hosters.
Meanwhile, another site prolifically posts different "stolen" updates for Swype like there's no tomorrow.
So instead of threatening another site like they have AF, they do the exact opposite: give 50 free beta invites to Swype.
What gives? They won't open up the beta to the public, but gives closed (precious) invites to the one website that basically distributes illegal copies of their software! Only thing worse would've been to put it on xda itself! =)
Don't get me wrong, I don't fault AF for abiding by their own rules as well as Swype's requests. I'm just confused by why Swype would endorse and embrace a site that seems to do exactly what they've requested AF not to do...
On top of which: they're asking AF to police individuals' posts. meanwhile, the DL editors are the ones posting it! they're content generators, not forum-post hosters.
