• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Something for Mobile Computer Owners

andruoid

Android Expert
Jan 10, 2011
1,428
1,313
BC, Canada
I'm not paranoid. :D I just like being as safe as possible with my personal data. Now that I have a laptop that is 'more exposed' to the outside world I have to be extra careful. Most laptops come with 7 Home Premium which by default has no way of encrypting the entire drive, partitions, folders or even singles files. Sometimes the laptop may come with MyWinLocker but its very limited; a maximum 50GB virtual drive is made to dump folders/files into. 7 Professional can encrypt folder and files, 7 Ultimate can encrypt the entire drive with Bitlocker. So, is a Home Premium owner left without this type of security (if they want/need it)? Nope.

After a Google and reading reviews on paid and free encrypting software one has had nothing but excellent reviews and comments. The software is called TrueCrypt its free and open-source disk encryption software (donations accepted). It can encrypt specific partitions, system partitions or the entire drive. Encryption levels vary from AES, Serpent, Twofish and cascading (combining) combinations of 2 or 3. There are many more options and details i still have yet to explore so if you are interested there is more info on their website: TrueCrypt - Free Open-Source On-The-Fly Disk Encryption Software for Windows 7/Vista/XP, Mac OS X and Linux
 
Who validates source commits if it's open source?

I wouldn't trust anything open source to encrypt or secure anything personally. The code is available for all to see. If an exploit was found, your trust relies soley on the source owner's ability to identify security holes and keep them plugged.

Sorry, I really dont mean to sound rude or anything, but this is very incorrect.

Most modern cryptography is based on open source process.

Advanced Encryption Standard process - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
  • Like
Reactions: SUroot
Upvote 0
Sorry, I really dont mean to sound rude or anything, but this is very incorrect.

Most modern cryptography is based on open source process.

Advanced Encryption Standard process - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thats fine, I don't see it as rude. Its a discussion ;)

I'm not sure about it mostly being open sourced, so thanks for the link.

I work within an enterprise environment, so my perspective may be a little different. I just don't trust anything that others can see the code for because as far as I am concerned, this allows people to find and exploit security holes. Obviously this type of thing would take huge talent but I see it as possible.

I suppose as I work in an enterprise environment where data security is paramount, I could never look at anything other than Pointsec FDE.

It may sound like I am an untrusting fool, but I am ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: alostpacket
Upvote 0
Thats fine, I don't see it as rude. Its a discussion ;)

I'm not sure about it mostly being open sourced, so thanks for the link.

I work within an enterprise environment, so my perspective may be a little different. I just don't trust anything that others can see the code for because as far as I am concerned, this allows people to find and exploit security holes. Obviously this type of thing would take huge talent but I see it as possible.

I suppose as I work in an enterprise environment where data security is paramount, I could never look at anything other than Pointsec FDE.

It may sound like I am an untrusting fool, but I am ;)


Oh I'm an untrusting ol' fool myself :) The skepticism runs deep with us techy types.

Healthy skepticism is good too, especially with security. But at some point things have to be "good enough" I think. And I also think that argument can be turned around to say it dangerous to trust those few people behind closed source to be the gatekeepers.

A lot of the big open source project I know about have more than one person with commit priviledges for the code patches. It's basically why Git and other DCVS were invented :) They wanted a more robust way to work together with distributed oversight of the patches. This is actually one of the main driving forces behind the open source movement: more eyballs = more fixes = more security and stability.

Anyways I got to run but cheers for the nice reply :)
 
Upvote 0
And I also think that argument can be turned around to say it dangerous to trust those few people behind closed source to be the gatekeepers.

Now that you have said that, I agree there. Touche ;)

I think the key must be research, research, research. Research the companies behind the source and make an informed decision.
 
Upvote 0
Hahaha Wicked.

I just re-used this in my office as it seemed appropriate

687474703a2f2f692e696d6775722e636f6d2f7937486d392e6a7067
 
  • Like
Reactions: alostpacket
Upvote 0
In another post I mentioned I bought a new HDD. The stock Hitachi that I replaced is fully encrypted with TrueCrypt. I thought I'd see what happens by putting it in a USB enclosure and connect it just to see if anything is visible. I plugged it in and nothing; the USB bridge told me there was a Hitachi device connected however, the drive didn't show up at all in My Computer. +1 ;-)
 
  • Like
Reactions: alostpacket
Upvote 0

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones