I dont mean to knock any devs or anything, but I cannot find a differnce in ROMs within the same category. I mean they are cool to try and flash and all but really, where are the "big" differences between, Mik 2.1 and Synergy rls1? what about evolved "final" and mik 3d? even the beta of 3.5 seems similar to that of evolved "final" and mik 3d. I mean there are differences obviously but I mean not in the looks. Its just in the features as supersonic settings (i can change the title and rosie features). I have flashed so many roms so far and on the sense side, they are all the same to me with respect to the category (3.0, 2.1, etc).
I feel like I am lissing the features everyone else are enjoying to say, ah thats the differences.
Example:
[ROM] - [MikRoms] - [9/23/2011] - MikG v2.53 - Re-Engineered GB Sense 2.1 + 3.0
-vs-
[ROM] Synergy - [RLS1 08/05/2011] - Now With Warm Sprinkles!
(besides the speed, the boot animation, the browser, and mik has mik app.)
[ROM][8.31.11][370mb+free] EVOlvedROM r3chargeD RLS1ish "Just Another Sense 3.0 Port"
-vs-
Mik3D - Beta 1 - [8/15/2011]
(again besides apps, boot animation, wheer is the difference)
Again, I am not being disrespectful but just assistance in opening my eyes to what I am looking at. Dont take it personally as its not a knock on developers, but shedding light on the reasons for so many different roms under the same categories. There should be obvious differences.